Table 3 Competitive silylation reactions of alcohols using HMDS in the presence of H3PW12O40 at 55–60 ЊC under solvent-free conditions
The method shows reasonably high selectivity among different
hydroxy and amine functional groups. The catalyst is a hetero-
geneous, recyclable, non-corrosive and environmentally benign
compound. Isolation of the product from a heterogeneous
reaction mixture is much easier than from a homogeneous
system and by a simple extraction and evaporation of the
solvent, the pure product could be isolated. The catalytic
activity of H3PW12O40 was found to be much higher than that
of HY-zeolite, Amberlyst-15, triflic acid, toluene-p-sulfonic
acid and sulfuric acid.
CH2–OTMS), 0.06 [s, 9H, –OSi(CH3)3]; IR (KBr): 3442 (OH),
1251 (OTMS) cmϪ1.
5c: 1H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.06 [s, 9H, OSi(CH3)3],
3.47 (t, 2H, CH2–OTMS), 2.48 (t, 2H, CH2–CO), 2.25 (s, 3H,
CH3–CO); IR (KBr): absence of OH absorption, 1643 (CO),
1251 (OTMS) cmϪ1.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the generous support of this work
by the Shiraz University Research Council.
Experimental
References
General
1 T. Okuhara, N. Mizuno and M. Misono, Adv. Catal., 1996, 41, 221.
2 (a) M. N. Tiofeeva, A. V. Dimidov and I. V. Kozhevnikov, J. Mol.
Catal., 1993, 79, 21; (b) R. S. Drago, J. A. Dias and T. Maier, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 7702.
3 Y. Ono, J. M. Thomas and K. I. Zamaraev (Eds.), Perspectives in
Catalysis, Blackwell, London, 1992, p. 341.
4 I. V. Kozhevnikov and K. I. Matveev, Appl. Catal., 1983, 5, 135.
5 Y. Izumi, K. Urabe and A. Onaka, Zeolite, Clay and Heteropolyacids
in Organic Chemistry, Kodansha, Tokyo–VCH, Weinheim, 1992,
p. 99.
Chemicals were either prepared in our laboratories or were
purchased from Fluka or Merck. Heteropolyacid (H3PW12O40)
was purchased from Merck and was purified by the liter-
ature method.19 The purity determination of the products was
accomplished by GC on a Shimadzu model GC-14A instru-
ment or by TLC on silica gel polygram SIL G/UV 254 plates.
The FTIR spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu model
8300 instrument. The NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker
Advance DPX 250 MHz spectrometer.
6 I. V. Kozhevnikov, Catal. Rev.-Sci. Eng., 1995, 37(2), 311.
7 M. Misono and N. Noriji, Appl. Catal., 1990, 64, 1.
8 Y. Izumi, R. Hasebe and K. Urabe, J. Catal., 1983, 84, 402.
9 H. Soeda, T. Okuhara and M. Misono, Chem. Lett., 1994, 909.
10 M. A. Schwegler, H. van Bekkum and N. Munck, Appl. Catal., 1991,
74, 191.
11 (a) H. Firouzabadi, N. Iranpoor and K. Amani, Green Chem., 2000,
3, 131; (b) H. Firouzabadi, N. Iranpoor and K. Amani, Synthesis,
2001, 59; (c) H. Firouzabadi, N. Iranpoor and K. Amani, J. Mol.
Catal., 2002, in the press; (d ) H. Firouzabadi, N. Iranpoor and
K. Amani, Synthesis, 2002, in the press.
12 C. A Bruynes and T. K. Jurriens, J. Org. Chem., 1982, 47, 3966.
13 (a) S. H. Langer, S. Connell and J. Wender, J. Org. Chem., 1958, 23,
50; (b) P. Guttret, S. El-Ghamarti, A. Legrand, D. Coutrier and
B. Rigo, Synth. Commun., 1996, 26, 707; (c) A. G. Goldschmidt,
German Patent 2758884 ((Chem. Abstr., 1979, 90, 65300)); (d )
H. Firouzabadi and B. Karimi, Synth. Commun., 1993, 23, 1633;
(e) H. Firouzabadi, A. R. Sardarian, Z. Khayat, B. Karimi and
S. Tangestaninejad, Synth. Commun., 1997, 27, 2709; ( f ) M. Curini,
F. Epifano, M. C. Marcotullio, O. Rosati and U. Constantino, Synth.
Commun., 1999, 29, 541; (g) Z. H. Zhang, T. S. Li, F. Yang and
C. G. Fu, Synth. Commun., 1998, 28, 3105; (h) K. Zuercher and
H. Hadorn, Dtsch. Lebensm.-Rundsch., 1975, 71, 68; (i) Wacker
General procedure for silylation of alcohols using HMDS
catalyzed with tungstophosphoric acid
Alcohol (1 mmol), HMDS (0.8 mmol) and the catalyst
(0.01 mmol, 0.028 g) were mixed and heated at 55–60 ЊC for
the appropriate reaction time (Table 2). After completion of
the reaction (monitored by TLC and GC), n-hexane (5 ml) was
added and the catalyst was recovered by filtration and was
washed with n-hexane (2 × 5 ml). The filtrate was then washed
with water (10 ml) to destroy the extra amounts of
HMDS and the organic layer was dried over anhydrous
Na2SO4. Evaporation of the solvent under reduced pressure
gave the highly pure product without further purification.
1
4a: H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 3.58 [s, 2H (NH2)],
6.2–6.53 [m, 5H (Ph)], 0.17 [s, 9H (TMS)]; IR (KBr): 3382,
3478, 1600, N–H, 1253 (O–TMS) cmϪ1.
5a: 1H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.09 (d, 3H,
CH3–CHOH), 3.45–3.58 (m, 1H, –CH–OH), 3.8 (s, 1H, –OH),
1.32–1.66 (m, 2H, CH3CH(OH)–CH2–CH2–OTMS), 3.6 (t, 2H,
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 2002, 2601–2604
2603