Dileep R. and B. R. Bhat
PdL3
(30 m length and 0.25 mm diameter) and a flame ionization detec-
tor (FID). The initial column temperature was increased from 60 to
Yield: 72%. IR (KBr, cm 1): 3106 (s), 630, 475 (m), 1585 (s), 1340
−
◦
◦
◦
1
4
50 C at the rate of 10 C/min and then to 220 C at the rate of
0 C/min Nitrogen gas was used as the carrier gas. The tempera-
1
(w), 552 (m), 1439, 1093, 698. H NMR (CDCl3, δ ppm): 3.8 (s, 1H,
◦
N–H), 6.7–7.3 (m, 15 H, Ar–H), 7.8–7.9 (m, 8 H, Ar–H), 8.5 (d, 1 H,
tures of the injection port and FID were kept constant at 150 and
1
3
–
CH N–); C NMR (ppm): 160.55 (C–O), 153.46 (C N), 144.48
C–P), 161.61, 147.17, 137.01, 114.55, 105.97 (carbon atoms in
pyridine), 111.34, 119.31, 121.77, 135.61, 139.63 (carbon atoms in
◦
2
50 C, respectively, during product analysis. The retention times
(
for different compounds were determined by injecting commer-
cially available compounds under identical gas chromatography
conditions. The oxidation products are commercially available,
and were identified by GC co-injection with authentic samples.
The products were isolated and were further confirmed by the
derivative test.
3
1
salicylaldehyde). P NMR (H3PO4, δ ppm): 22.5. CHN found (calcd)
for C30H24BrN3OPPd: C: 54.48 (54.61), H: 3.45 (3.67), N: 6.19 (6.37),
Pd: 16.05 (16.13); UV–vis: λmax intraligand interactions: 231, 277,
3
46, d → d forbidden transition: 443.
PdL4
Yield: 72%. IR (KBr, cm ): 3099 (s), 619, 481 (m), 1595 (s), 1351
Acknowledgments
−
1
The authors are thankful to the Technical Education Quality
Improvement Programme, NITK, for financial support. The authors
also thank Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, for NMR analysis.
1
(w), 549 (m), 1429, 1087, 695. H NMR (CDCl3, δ ppm): 3.8 (s, 1H,
N–H), 6.6–7.4 (m, 15 H, Ar–H), 7.4–7.8 (m, 8 H, Ar–H), 8.6 (d,
1
3
1
1
H, –CH N–); C NMR (ppm): 166.18 (C–O), 153.39 (C N),
44.42 C–P), 161.61, 147.17, 137.01, 114.55, 105.97 (carbon atoms
in pyridine), 119.03, 119.41, 129.81, 131.69, 140.73 (carbon atoms
in salicylaldehyde). P NMR (H3PO4, δ ppm): 22.8. CHN found
References
3
1
(
calcd) for C30H24N4O3PPd: C: 57.26 (57.57), H: 3.67 (3.86), N: 8.72
[1] H. B Friedrich, Platinum, Metals Rev. 1999, 43, 94.
[
2] M. H Heravi, D Ajami, K Aghapoor, M Ghassemzadeh, Chem.
(8.95), Pd: 16.83 (17.00); UV–vis: λmax intraligand interactions: 233,
Commun. 1999, 833.
2
71, 346, d → d forbidden transition: 449.
[
[
3] W. H Fung, W. Y Yu, C. M Che, J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 2873.
4] R. A Sheldon, I. W. C. E Arends, A Dijksman, Catal. Today 2000, 57,
1
57.
5] A Dijksman, I. W. C. E Arends, R. A Sheldon, Chem. Commun. 1999,
591.
[6] J. M. J Fr e´ chet, J Warnock, M. J Farrall, J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 2618.
PdL5
Yield: 75%. IR (KBr, cm ): 3109 (s), 618, 482 (m), 1586 (s), 1346
[
−
1
1
1
(w), 550 (m), 1428, 1105, 695. H NMR (CDCl3, δ ppm): 3.8 (s, 1H,
[
7] S.V Ley, A Madin, in Comprehensive Organic Synthesis (Eds.:
B. M Trost, I Fleming), Pergamon: Oxford, 1991.
[8] A Wolfson, S Wuyts, D. E De Vos, I. F. J Vankelecom, P. A Jacobs,
Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 8107.
9] J. W Li, W Sun, L. W Xu, C. G Xia, H.W Wang, Chin. Chem. Lett. 2004,
15, 1437.
10] B. S Chhikara, S Tehlan, A Kumar, Synlett. 2005, 63.
11] G Bianchini, M Crucianelli, F de Angelis, V Neri, R Saladino,
Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 2427.
N–H), 6.6–7.3 (m, 15 H, Ar–H), 7.4–7.8 (m, 8 H, Ar–H), 8.5 (d, 1 H,
1
3
–
(
CH N–); C NMR (ppm): 156.06 (C–O), 154.11 (C N), 143.61
C–P), 161.21, 147.20, 137.86, 114.65, 106.27 (carbon atoms in
pyridine), 115.24, 118.70, 120.10, 125.23, 152.78 (carbon atoms in
[
3
1
salicylaldehyde), 55.89 (CH3-O-). P NMR (H3PO4, δ ppm): 22.6.
[
[
CHN found (calcd) for C31H27N3O2PPd: C: 60.41 (60.94), H: 4.28
(4.45), N: 6.67 (6.88), Pd: 17.34 (17.42); UV–vis: λmax intraligand
interactions: 231, 273, 346, d → d forbidden transition: 442.
[12] A Kumar, N Jain, S. M. S Chauhan, Synlett. 2007, 411.
[
13] J Nan, J. R Arthur, Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 273.
[
14] S. M Islam, A Bose, B. K Palit, C. R Saha, J. Catal. 1998, 173, 268.
Catalytic Experiments
[15] R Karvembu, K Natarajan, Polyhedron 2002, 21, 1721.
16] R Karvembu, K Natarajan, Polyhedron 2002, 21, 219.
[17] R. M Silverstein, F. X Webster, D. J Kiemie, Spectrometric Identifica-
[
A
solution of palladium complex (0.02 mmol) in 20 ml
dichloromethane was added to the solution of substrate (1 mmol)
and NMO (1 mmol). The mixture was stirred at room temperature.
At the requisite times aliquots of the reaction mixture were re-
moved and the alcohol and aldehyde/ketone extracted with ether.
The ether solution was then analyzed by GC.
tion of Organic Compounds, 6th edn, John Wiley: New York, 2005.
18] M Muthu Tamizh, K Mereiter, K Kirchner, B. R Bhat, R Karvembu,
Polyhedron 2009, 28, 2157.
19] R. A Sheldon, I. W. C. E Arends, J. Mol. Cat A 2006, 251, 200.
20] A Dijksman, I. W. C. E Arends, R. A Sheldon, Org.Biomol.Chem. 2003,
1, 3232.
[
[
[
[
21] A. I Vogel, Textbook of Practical Organic Chemistry, 5th edn,
Longman: London, 1989.
[22] M Asma, A Badshah, S Ali, M Sohail, M Fettouhi, S Ahmad, A Malik,
Product Analysis
Transition Metal Chem. 2006, 31, 556.
23] A Sarkar, S Pal, Polyhedron 2006, 25, 1689.
The reaction product analysis was carried out using gas chro-
matography (GC) (Shimadzu 2014, Japan); the instrument has a
[
5% diphenyl and 95% dimethyl siloxane Restek capillary column
www.interscience.wiley.com/journal/aoc
Copyright ꢀc 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Appl. Organometal. Chem. 2010, 24, 663–666