were kept fixed during refinement. All other H-atoms were refined as rigid
groups. 1270 refined parameters; no restraints. R (I . 2s(I)): R1 5 0.0421,
wR2 5 0.0794. R (all data): R1 5 0.0857, wR2 5 0.0958, S 5 1.031.
groups. The catalytic data show a number of interesting differences
between the use of ligand assemblies based on P2 and P3. The
assemblies based on P2 give rise to much slower rhodium catalysts
as compared to the parent phosphane P2, though the selectivity
characteristics of typical diphosphane-ligated hydroformylation
catalysts are preserved (cf. entries 1–5). These results clearly point
to the presence of a diphosphane species during catalysis. The
lower activity of the catalysts with the P2-assembly ligands as
compared to parent P2 is ascribed to the steric impact of the
Zn(II)–salphen complexes in the ‘second coordination sphere’ of
the rhodium metal centre. In contrast, the catalysts derived from
the P3-assemblies show much higher activity (at least a 4-fold
increase) than their non-assembled parent phosphane P3, PPh3
(entries 1 and 3 vs. 6–9) and the P2-based assemblies (entries 4–5).
In addition, a different selectivity behavior is noted using these P3-
assemblies, and in general higher amounts of branched aldehyde
(B) (up to 55%, entry 9) are formed. These results agree with the
presence of a mono-phosphane rhodium catalyst during cataly-
sis.6a,b,12 Clearly, the encapsulation of phosphane template P3
upon addition of Zn(II)–salphen building blocks is far more
effective than for template P2.
Residual electron density between 20.33 and 0.40 e A23. CCDC 251478.
˚
in CIF or other electronic format.
1 (a) J. L. Sessler, B. Wang, S. L. Springs and C. T. Brown, in
Comprehensive Supramolecular Chemistry, ed. Y. Murakami, Pergamon,
Oxford, 1996; (b) J.-M. Lehn, Supramolecular Chemistry, Weinheim,
1995; (c) S. Leininger, B. Olenyuk and P. J. Stang, Chem. Rev., 2000,
100, 853.
2 (a) F. Fochi, P. Jacopozzi, E. Wegelius, K. Rissanen, P. Cozzini,
E. Marastoni, E. Fisicaro, P. Manini, R. Fokkens and E. Dalcanale,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 7539; (b) A. M. Rinco´n, P. Prados and
J. de Mendoza, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 3493; (c) J. de Mendoza,
Chem. Eur. J., 1998, 4, 1373; (d) K. D. Shimizu and J. Rebek, Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1995, 92, 12403; (e) L. R. MacGillivray and
J. L. Atwood, Nature, 1997, 289, 469.
3 (a) L. G. Mackay, R. S. Wylie and J. K. M. Sanders, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1994, 116, 3141; (b) C. M. Drain and J.-M. Lehn, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun., 1994, 2313; (c) P. J. Stang, J. Fan and B. Olenyuk, Chem.
Commun., 1997, 1453; (d) K. Funatsu, T. Imamura, A. Ichimura and
Y. Sasaki, Inorg. Chem., 1998, 37, 4986; (e) A. Okumura, K. Funatsu,
Y. Sasaki and T. Imamura, Chem. Lett., 1999, 779; (f) W. T. S. Huck,
A. Rohrer, A. T. Anilkumar, R. H. Fokkens, N. M. M. Nibbering,
F. C. J. M. van Veggel and D. N. Reinhoudt, New J. Chem., 1998, 165;
(g) C. A. Hunter and L. D. Sarson, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1994, 33,
2313.
4 (a) M. Fujita, N. Fujita, K. Ogura and K. Yamaguchi, Nature, 1999,
400, 52; (b) L. R. MacGillivray and J. L. Atwood, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 1999, 38, 1018; (c) M. Tominaga, K. Suzuki, M. Kawano,
T. Kusukawa, T. Ozeki, S. Sakamoto, K. Yamaguchi and M. Fujita,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 5621; (d) T. Beissel, R. E. Power and
K. N. Raymond, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1996, 35, 1084; (e)
B. Olenyuk, J. A. Whiteford, A. Fechtenkotter and P. J. Stang, Nature,
1999, 398, 796.
5 (a) J. Kang and J. Rebek, Nature, 1997, 385, 50–52; (b) M. L. Merlau,
M. P. Mejia, S. T. Nguyen and J. T. Hupp, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2001, 40, 4239; (c) D. H. Leung, D. Fiedler, R. G. Bergman and
K. N. Raymond, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 963–966; (d)
M. Yoshizawa, Y. Takeyama, T. Kusukawa and M. Fujita, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 1347; (e) M. Ziegler, J. L. Brumaghim and
K. N. Raymond, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2000, 39, 4119; (f) A. Lu¨tzen,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 1000; (g) D. Fiedler, D. H. Leung,
R. G. Bergman and K. N. Raymond, Acc. Chem. Res., 2005, 38, 351.
6 (a) V. F. Slagt, P. J. C. Kamer, P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen and
J. N. H. Reek, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 1526; (b) V. F. Slagt,
J. N. H. Reek, P. J. C. Kamer and P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 4271; (c) V. F. Slagt, M. Ro¨der, P. J. C.
Kamer, P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen and J. N. H. Reek, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2004, 126, 4056; (d) V. F. Slagt, P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen and
J. N. H. Reek, Chem. Commun., 2003, 2474; (e) V. F. Slagt,
P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen and J. N. H. Reek, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2003, 42, 5619.
In summary, we have demonstrated that Zn(II)–salphen
complexes are excellent building blocks for the construction of
catalytically active supramolecular assemblies based on coordina-
tive Npyr–Zn patterns. More importantly, small differences in the
phosphane template structure can be used to modify the catalytic
properties of the metal centre upon complexation to these salphen
structures and fine-tuning is viable through a proper choice of the
supramolecular building blocks (i.e., salphen and/or porphyrin
complexes). Particularly in the case of P3, encapsulation results in
effective shielding of the phosphorus atom. From the X-ray
structure it is clear that the assemblies based on P2 are sufficiently
open to allow the formation of a bis-phosphane metal complex.
We have successfully used this template effect in the hydro-
formylation of 1-octene and a substantial difference in the
regioselectivity and activity was observed between the use of P2-
and P3-assemblies. This can be attributed to the structural
difference of the intermediate Rh(I)-species (diphosphane ligation
for P2 vs. mono-phosphane ligation for P3), which is supported by
the NMR spectroscopic, X-ray crystallographic and modelling
studies. Currently, our research program is focused on the full
exploitation of these new phosphine assemblies to make extended
catalyst libraries and the optimisation of various organic
transformations.
7 A. W. Kleij, M. Kuil, D. M. Tooke, M. Lutz, A. L. Spek and
J. N. H. Reek, Chem. Eur. J., 2005, DOI: 10.2002/chem.200500227.
8 The crystallisation of assemblies of Zn–salphen complex 2 proved to be
easier than 1.
9 When 2 was used as Zn(II)–salpen complex in these NMR experiments,
the same species were observed in the 31P{1H} NMR spectrum. Non-
exclusive formation of a diphosphane species based on this Rh-
precursor can be interpreted as the influence of the cis-coordinating
mode of the bidentate acac-ligand, which effectively blocks a trans-
spanning of the two phosphane ligands through isomerisation.
10 Under the conditions applied the salphen building blocks are not
affected, which was confirmed in a separate control experiment.
11 A. Buhling, P. C. J. Kamer and P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen, J. Mol.
Catal., 98, 69.
12 (a) A. van Rooy, E. N. Orij, P. C. J. Kamer and P. W. N. M. van
Leeuwen, Organometallics, 1995, 14, 34; (b) P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen
and C. F. Roobeek, J. Organomet. Chem., 1983, 258, 343; (c) B. Breit
and E. Fuchs, Chem. Commun., 2004, 694; (d) B. Breit, R. Winde,
T. Mackewitz, R. Paciello and K. Harms, Chem. Eur. J., 2001, 7, 3106.
Notes and references
{ Crystal structure determination: Structure (2)3?P2: C99H96Cl6N9O6PZn3?
5CH3CN, FW 5 2152.90, yellow needle, 0.36 6 0.12 6 0.09 mm3,
¯
˚
triclinic, P1 (No. 2), a 5 14.4818(3), b 5 17.0579(3), c 5 23.2334(4) A,
3
˚
a 5 78.2385(6), b 5 87.6536(6), c 5 71.2122(9)u, V 5 5317.55(17) A , Z 5 2,
r 5 1.345 g cm23, m 5 0.90 mm21, 57108 measured reflections, 15149
unique reflections (Rint 5 0.082). Absorption correction based on multiple
measured reflections (correction range 0.83–0.92). Non H-atoms were
refined freely with anisotropic displacement parameters. H-atoms were
introduced in calculated positions. H-atoms of the acetonitrile molecules
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2005
Chem. Commun., 2005, 3661–3663 | 3663