C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Figure 2. Temperature-programmed oxidation reactions. (a) Comparison of Pt and Au-Pt heteroaggregate catalysts for H2 oxidation in H2/CO/O2 fuel
streams (50:0.2:0.5) with Ar balance. CO and O2 are normalized to inlet composition. H2O composition is normalized with respect to H2O generated if the
limiting reactant O2 were completely converted to H2O. When all O2 and CO are consumed, 80% of the O2 is used to form H2O and the other 20% is used
for conversion of CO to CO2. (b) H2 oxidation with the Au-Pt heteroaggregate catalyst in 1000 ppm CO (H2/CO/O2 fuel streams, 50:0.1:0.5) showing the
84 °C H2 lightoff. The 90% maximum for normalized H2O composition is again based on O2, and the remaining 10% is used for CO oxidation.
Temperature-programmed reactor experiments (TPR) for oxida-
tion of CO-contaminated H2 fuels were conducted to estimate the
potential of the Au-Pt heteroaggregates for CO-tolerant H2
electrooxidation catalysts. The alumina-supported catalysts were
exposed to streams of H2/CO/O2 flowing at 21 cm/s, and the exhaust
was continuously monitored by mass spectrometry (Thermo Prima
δB). Oxygen-deficient fuel streams were employed to evaluate the
discrimination between CO versus H2 oxidation. The initial
experiments were conducted with 2000 ppm CO concentrations and
a hydrogen-to-CO ratio of 250:1. The results (Figure 2a) show that
the activity of the monometallic Pt catalyst is significantly impeded
by the CO impurity, which raises the H2 lightoff temperature to
175 °C. In pure H2, the same Pt catalyst has a 50 °C lightoff and
achieves 100% O2 conversion by 60 °C. In contrast, the Au-Pt
heteroaggregate catalyst is significantly more active in the presence
of CO, showing a 105 °C lightoff under identical conditions and
Pt loadings. Note that less than 1% of the H2 is consumed and the
observed 80% yield of water is based on the limiting reagent, O2.
The remaining 20% of the O2 is used for the oxidation of CO to
CO2. Control experiments were also conducted in which Au NPs
and monometallic Au/Pt NP mixtures were co-deposited from
colloidal suspensions and evaluated under the same conditions and
loadings (Figure S-4). The Au catalysts had little activity for CO
or H2 oxidation under 200 °C. It is well-known5-8 that Au NPs
larger than 5 nm are not active for CO oxidation, and the lack of
reactivity from the 11 nm NPs described here is not surprising.
Moreover, the monometallic Au/Pt mixture displayed reactivity very
similar to that of pure Pt (Figure S-4). The remarkable enhancement
in CO tolerance observed for the Au-Pt heteroaggregate catalyst
is due to its bimetallic nature and its heteroaggregate architecture
and is not just a function of its elemental composition.
H2 lightoff in both experiments and reaches completion in the 1000
ppm CO case. This observation is consistent with CO poisoning
models in which strong CO binding to Pt surfaces blocks sites for
O2 and H2 activation. Since CO does not bind strongly to large Au
NPs, we speculate that the Au core most likely activates O2 and
facilitates14 CO oxidation at the Au-Pt interface (the triple-phase
boundary). By oxidizing the CO at the interface, the Pt tendrils are
cleansed of CO contaminates and resume their primary function
as H2 oxidation catalysts. The detailed mechanism for enhanced
CO tolerance of the Au-Pt heteroaggregate NPs is currently under
investigation in order to explore the potential use of these catalyst
for CO-tolerant anodes in low-temperature fuel cell applications.
Acknowledgment. This material is based upon work supported
by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0401850, and
the U.S. Department of Energy’s Oak Ridge National Lab under
the Advanced Reciprocating Engine Systems Program. We thank
Dr. Ray Tweston of Gatan for assistance with the EELS data.
Supporting Information Available: Additional TEM data, particle
phase maps, EELS data, control reactivity studies, and experimental
details (5 pages, print/PDF). This material is available free of charge
References
(1) Zhang, B.; Li, J. F.; Zhong, Q. L.; Ren, B.; Tian, Z. Q.; Zou, S. Z.
Langmuir 2005, 21, 7449-7455.
(2) Lang, H.; Maldonado, S.; Stevenson, K. J.; Chandler, B. D. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2004, 126, 12949-12956.
(3) Wu, M. L.; Chen, D. H.; Huang, T. C. Chem. Mater. 2001, 13, 599-606.
(4) Henglein, A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 2201-2203.
(5) Bulushev, D. A.; Yuranov, I.; Suvorova, E. I.; Buffat, P. A.; Kiwi-Minsker,
L. J. Catal. 2004, 224, 8-17.
(6) Daniells, S. T.; Overweg, A. R.; Makkee, M.; Moulijn, J. A. J. Catal.
2005, 230, 52-65.
(7) Kung, H. H.; Kung, M. C.; Costello, C. K. J. Catal. 2003, 216, 425-
432.
To further probe the relationship between CO contamination and
H2 lightoff, we evaluated the AuPt heteroaggregate catalyst for H2
oxidation in a 1000 ppm CO fuel stream. The results (Figure 2b)
show that H2 lightoff drops to 84 °C and 100% oxygen conversion
by 92 °C. Again, the observed 90% yield of water is based on O2
feed concentrations, and less than 1% of the H2 is consumed.
Additional tests in highly O2-deficient feeds (H2/CO/O2 - 50:0.45:
0.2) show that CO is selectively oxidized (see Figure S-4).
In the Pt and Au-Pt heteroaggregate TPR experiments, CO
oxidation and H2 lightoff are clearly linked. CO oxidation precedes
(8) Chen, M. S.; Goodman, D. W. Science 2004, 306, 252-255.
(9) Avgouropoulos, G.; Ioannides, T. Appl. Catal. B 2005, 56, 77-86.
(10) Hiramatsu, H.; Osterloh, F. E.Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 2509-2511.
(11) Yuan, J.; Li, W. N.; Gomez, S.; Suib, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
14184-14185.
(12) Zitoun, D.; Pinna, N.; Frolet, N.; Belin, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
15034-15035.
(13) Gu, H.; Yang, Z.; Gao, J.; Chang, C. K.; Xu, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 34-35.
(14) Deng, X.; Min, B. K.; Guloy, A.; Friend, C. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 9267-9270.
JA056924+
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 6, 2006 1781