Full Papers
ing the external hydride takes place. The formation of the anal-
ogous metal-centered ruthenium hydride complex under the
and the [Cp*MCl
2
18]
]
2
precursors were prepared according to litera-
[
ture procedures. All reactions with air-sensitive compounds were
performed under an argon atmosphere using standard Schlenk
techniques. NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance DPX
[
17]
experimental conditions was previously reported. The overall
reaction mechanism for the reduction of bicarbonate to for-
mate with 1 is depicted in Scheme 4.
4
00. Chemical shifts are given in ppm and were referenced to the
13
residual proton resonance or to the natural abundance C reso-
nance of the solvent, respectively. Proton and carbon assignments
were confirmed using two-dimensional NMR spectroscopy (COSY
and HMQC). Elemental analyses were obtained from the Microana-
lytical Laboratory of Technical University of Munich. ESI–MS spectra
were recorded on a ThermoElectron LCQ classic instrument.
General synthetic procedure
The methylene-bridged ligand (1.0 eq) was dissolved in 20 mL of
degassed H O, Ag O (1.0 eq) was added, and the suspension was
2
2
stirred at 508C under protection from light. After 90 min NaCl (1.0
eq) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred for another
1
5 min. A solution of [Cp*MCl ] (0.5 eq) in 15 mL of a degassed
2 2
H O/DMSO mixture (1:1) was added to the suspension. After sol-
2
vent removal in vacuo at 508C the residue was extracted with
MeOH (2ꢃ10 mL). The combined extracts were filtered over silica
and the metal complexes were precipitated upon addition of Et O
2
(
50 mL). The product was obtained by washing the solid with Et O
2
(
1
2
3ꢃ10 mL) and drying in vacuo.
1
3
: H NMR (400 MHz, [D ]MeOD, 300 K): d=7.58 (d, J(H-H)=2.1 Hz,
4
3
2
H, NCHCHN), 7.49 (d, J(H-H)=2.1 Hz, 2H, NCHCHN), 6.32 (d, J(H-
2
H)=13.2 Hz, 1H NCHH’N), 5.67 (d, J(H-H)=13.2 Hz, 1H, NCHH’N),
4
3
.39 (t, J(H-H)=8.1 Hz, 4H, NCH CH ), 2.94–2.87 (m, 4H,
2 2
CH CH SO ), 2.42–2.27 (m, 2H, CH CH CH SO ), 2.24–2.12 (m, 2H,
2
2
3
2
2
2
3
Scheme 4. Proposed overall mechanism for the reduction of bicarbonate to
formate.
13
CH CH CH SO ) 1.75 ppm (s, 15H, Cp(CH ) ); C NMR (101 MHz,
2
2
2
3
3 5
1
[
(
D ]MeOD, 300 K): d=169.8 (d, J(Rh-C)=50.8 Hz, C Rh), 124.0
4
I
m
1
C H), 123.3 (C H), 101.3 (d, J(Rh-C)=5.4 Hz, C CH ), 62.9
Im Im Cp 3
(
9
NCH N), 50.6 (NCH CH ), 49.8 (CH CH SO ), 27.8 (CH CH CH ),
2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2
Conclusions
À
.8 ppm (C CH ); MS (ESI) m/z (%): 663.4 ([MÀNa] ) (100), 1351.3
Cp
3
À
(
[2MÀNa] )
(13);
elemental
analysis:
calcd
(%)
for
In this work the synthesis of highly water-soluble bis-NHC com-
plexes of rhodium, iridium, and ruthenium is presented. These
complexes are shown to be efficient catalysts for the reduction
of bicarbonate to formate as well as for the hydrogen genera-
tion from formic acid. Using the rhodium derivative, a high
TOF and one of the highest reported TONs for formic acid de-
composition are obtained under ambient conditions and with-
out application of any additives. In bicarbonate reduction, the
C H ClN NaO S RhCl·5H O: C 35.55, H 5.58, N 7.21, S 8.36; found:
23
33
4
6
2
2
C 35.38, H 5.26, N 7.12, S 8.36.
2
2
H)=13.1 Hz, 1H, NCHH’N), 5.60 (d, J(H-H)=13.1 Hz, 1H NCHH’N),
4.32 (t, J(H-H)=8.1 Hz, 4H, NCH CH ), 2.93–2.86 (m, 4H,
CH
1
3
: H NMR (400 MHz, [D ]MeOD, 300 K): d=7.53 (d, J(H-H)=2.1 Hz,
4
3
2
H, NCHCHN), 7.50 (d, J(H-H)=2.1 Hz, 2H, NCHCHN), 6.24 (d, J(H-
2
3
2
2
CH SO ), 2.43–2.32 (m, 2H, CH CH CH SO ), 2.23–2.13 (m, 2H,
2 3 2 2 2 3
2
13
CH CH CH SO ) 1.82 ppm (s, 15H, Cp(CH ) ); C NMR (101 MHz,
2
2
2
3
3 5
[
(
(
(
D ]MeOD, 300 K): d=152.4 (C Ir), 122.9 (C H), 122.5 (C H), 94.6
C CH ), 63.1 (NCH N), 50.2 (NCH CH ), 49.8 (CH CH SO ), 28.2
4 Im Im Im
(optimized) TON of the rhodium derivative is in the range of
Cp
3
2
2
2
2
2
3
the best catalysts reported so far without additionally pressur-
À
CH CH CH ), 9.5 ppm (C CH ); MS (ESI) m/z (%): 753.4 ([MÀNa] )
2
2
2
Cp
3
izing the reaction vessel with CO . The high activities for both
À
À
2
100), 1507.4 ([2MÀ2Na+H] ) (4) 1529.4 ([2MÀNa] ) (9); elemental
processes, hydrogen storage and release, potentially enable
a total hydrogen storage cycle. The high catalyst stability and
analysis: calcd (%) for C H ClN NaO S IrCl·4H O: C 32.56, H 4.87,
23
33
4
6
2
2
N 6.60, S 7.56; found: C 32.76, H 4.44, N 6.47, S 7.53.
the ability to perform a H -storage cycle without intermediate
2
catalyst recovery could make the protocol highly sustainable.
The use of water as solvent, the absence of additives such as
amines, and the mild reaction conditions lead to a very envi-
ronmentally friendly hydrogen storage system.
Catalytic Reactions
Closed-vessel formic acid decomposition: Fisher–Porter bottle
1
0 mL of formate buffer with the desired concentration and pH
value were charged into a Fisher–Porter bottle, which was then
closed and fitted with a pressure transducer. After heating to the
desired temperature and reaching constant pressure for equilibra-
tion, the bottle was reopened and the catalyst was added as
a highly concentrated aqueous solution. The bottle was closed and
the pressure increase was observed. The calculations of the TOFs
and TONs are described in the Supporting Information.
Experimental Section
General Remarks
Commercially available precursors and reagents were used without
purification unless noted otherwise. The methylene bridged ligand
ChemSusChem 2016, 9, 1 – 7
5
ꢁ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
&
These are not the final page numbers! ÞÞ