STRUCTURE OF THE ACTIVE COMPONENT AND CATALYTIC PROPERTIES
421
ature) in the course of tests performed under tempera-
REFERENCES
ture-programmed conditions in an atmosphere of CO
for Ni/MgO and NAS2 samples. The rate profile of car-
bon formation exhibited two maximums at 700 and
1000 K, which were attributed previously to the forma-
tion of egg-shell graphite around metal particles and
carbon nanotubes, respectively [30].
It can be seen that sample NAS2 was less active and
rapidly deactivated in the course of reaction. Moreover,
this sample did not exhibit noticeable activity in the for-
mation of nanotubes. The two other NAS samples were
found even less active in the disproportionation of CO.
Table 6 summarizes the results of tests of the samples
in the disproportionation of CO. The activities of sam-
ples NAS1 and NAS3 in the region of nanotube forma-
tion (temperatures above 850 K) were lower than the
activity of Ni/MgO by one order of magnitude.
1. Khassin, A.A., Yurieva, T.M., Demeshkina, M.P., Kus-
tova, G.N., Itenberg, I.Sh., Kaichev, V.V., Plyasova, L.M.,
Anufrienko, V.F., Molina, I.Yu., Larina, T.V., Baron-
skaya, N.A., and Parmon, V.N., Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys., 2003, vol. 5, no. 18, p. 4025.
2. Khasin, A.A. and Kovalenko, A.S., Dokl. Akad. Nauk,
2004, vol. 397, no. 6, p. 786.
3. Klemperer, D.F. and Stone, F.S., Proc. Roy. Soc., 1957,
vol. A243, p. 375.
4. Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Wag-
ner, C.D., Riggs, W.M., Davis, L.E., Moulder, J.F., and
Muilenberg, G.E., Eds., Eden Prairie, Minn.: Perkin-
Elmer, 1978.
5. Plyasova, L.M., Kriger, T.A., Khasin, A.A., and Par-
mon, V.N., Dokl. Akad. Nauk, 2002, vol. 382, no. 4,
p. 505.
6. Barbier, A., Pereira, E.B., and Martin, G.A., Catal. Lett.,
1997, vol. 45, p. 221.
CONCLUSIONS
7. Christmann, K., Behm, R.J., Ertl, G., van Hove, M.A.,
and Weinberg, W.H., J. Chem. Phys., 1979, vol. 70,
p. 4168.
The reduction of Ni–Mg aluminosilicates with the
amesite structure with hydrogen at 920 K resulted in the
formation of metal nickel particles coated with a thick
amorphous oxide shell (2 nm in thickness). Because of
this, reduced NAS samples cannot chemisorb oxygen;
however, they exhibit high adsorption capacity for
hydrogen. Correspondingly, these samples exhibit cat-
alytic properties that are much different from those of
Ni/MgO.
8. Brennan, D., Hayward, D.O., and Trapnell, B.M.W.,
Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. A, 1960, vol. 256, p. 81.
9. Criado, J.M., React. Kinet. Catal. Lett., 1978, vol. 8,
p. 143.
10. Smith, J.S., Thrower, P.A., and Vannice, M.A., J. Catal.,
1981, vol. 68, p. 270.
Thus, the Ni0 core–oxide shell particles are highly
active in steam methane reforming. In this case, the
specific activity of a single hydrogen adsorption site is
no less than half of the observed activity of nickel metal
in the Ni/MgO catalyst. The specific activity of the Ni0
core–oxide shell particles in the hydrogenation of CO is
little different from the specific activity of nickel metal
in the Ni/MgO catalytic system.
11. Delmon, B., J. Mol. Catal., 1990, vol. 59, p. 179.
12. Khassin, A.A., Yurieva, T.M., Kustova, G.N., Plya-
sova, L.M., Itenberg, I.Sh., Demeshkina, M.P., Cher-
mashentseva, G.K., Anufrienko, V.F., Zaikovskii, V.I.,
Larina, T.V., Molina, I.Yu., and Parmon, V.N., J. Mol.
Catal. A: Chem., 2001, vol. 168, p. 209.
13. McIntyre, N.S. and Cook, M.G., Anal. Chem., 1975,
vol. 47, p. 2208.
At the same time, the Ni0 core–oxide shell particles
are completely inactive in the reactions of graphite-like
carbon formation in both methane decomposition and
CO disproportionation. The trace activity of NAS cata-
lysts observed in these processes can be attributed to
the impurities of undecorated Ni0. Based on the exper-
imental data, we can conclude that metal nickel parti-
cles decorated with an oxide shell exhibit high selectiv-
ity in steam methane reforming but do not exhibit activ-
ity in the formation of graphite-like phases.
14. McIntyre, N.S., Rummery, T.E., Cook, M.G., and Owen, D.,
J. Electrochem. Soc., 1976, vol. 123, p. 1164.
15. Kim, K.S. and Winograd, N., Surf. Sci., 1974, vol. 43,
p. 625.
16. Shavloy, R.B., Reucroft, P.J., and Davis, B.H., J. Catal.,
1979, vol. 56, p. 336.
17. Li, C.P., Proctor, A., and Hercules, D.M., Appl. Spec-
trosc., 1984, vol. 38, p. 880.
18. Carley, A.F., Jackson, S.D., O’Shea, J.N., and Ro-
berts, M.W., Surf. Sci., 1999, vol. 440, p. L868.
19. Sakiyama, K., Koga, K., Seto, T., Hirasawa, M., and
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Orii, T., J. Phys. Chem. B, 2004, vol. 108, p. 523.
We are grateful to Dr. Sci. (Chem.) L.M. Plyasova
and Cand. Sci. (Chem.) I.Sh. Itenberg for their assis-
tance and helpful discussions and toA.S. Kovalenko for
participation in the experiments. This work was sup-
ported by the Siberian Division of the Russian Acad-
emy of Sciences (a grant for young scientists). A.A.
Khasin acknowledges the support of the Russian Sci-
ence Support Foundation.
20. Khassin, A.A., Yurieva, T.M., Kaichev, V.V., Bukhti-
yarov, V.I., Budneva, A.A., Paukshtis, E.A., and Par-
mon, V.N., J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2001, vol. 175,
p. 189.
21. Khassin, A.A., Anufrienko, V.F., Ikorskii, V.N., Plya-
sova, L.M., Kustova, G.N., Larina, T.V., Molina, I.Yu., and
Parmon, V.N., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2002, vol. 4,
p. 4236.
KINETICS AND CATALYSIS Vol. 47 No. 3 2006