phosphite ligands have emerged as suitable ligands for many
metal-catalyzed asymmetric processes. Phosphite ligands are
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of
phosphite-oxazoline ligands applied to the Heck reaction.
The synthesis of ligands 4-6 is straightforward (Scheme
5
extremely attractive for catalysis because they are easy to
prepare from readily available alcohols. The availability of
many alcohols makes simple ligand-tuning possible, which
allows the synthesis of many series of chiral ligands that
can be screened for high activity and selectivity. Taking
advantage of this high modularity and following our interest
in carbohydrates as highly versatile and cheap raw materials,
in this paper we describe a new family of phosphite-oxazoline
ligands (Scheme 2) derived from natural D-glucosamine, for
7
2). They are easily prepared by attaching several phospho-
8
9
rochloridites to the hydroxy-oxazoline scaffolds. The highly
modular construction of these ligands enables us to easily
study the effects of both the phosphite and the oxazoline
moieties on catalytic activity and selectivity. By carefully
selecting these elements we achieved high regio- and
enantioselectivities and improved activities for several
substrates.
For an initial evaluation of this new type of ligand for the
palladium-catalyzed asymmetric Heck reaction, we chose the
phenylation of 2,3-dihydrofuran 1 (Scheme 1). As this
reaction has been carried out with a variety of ligands
carrying different donor groups, it is possible to directly
compare the efficacy of different ligand systems. The
reactions were carried out with the palladium complex
generated in situ by mixing the corresponding chiral ligand
Scheme 2
1
0
2 3
and [Pd (dba) ]‚dba.
In a first set of experiments, we used ligand 4 to investigate
how the solvent and temperature affected the activity and
selectivity of the catalyst (Table 1, entries 1-6). In all cases,
Table 1. Pd-Catalyzed Enantioselective Phenylation of
a
2,3-Dihydrofuran 1 Using Phosphite-oxazoline Ligands 4-9
entry
ligand
solvent
% conv (2:3)b
% ee 2c
% ee 3c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
6
7
8
9
toluene
benzene
DMF
THF
THF
THF
THF
THF
THF
THF
80 (85:15)
77 (84:16)
15 (71:29)
98 (87:13)
100 (80:20)
28 (88:12)
80 (71:29)
12 (65:35)
86 (85:15)
45 (60:40)
100 (97:3)
96 (R)
95 (R)
87 (R)
97 (R)
93 (R)
98 (R)
84 (R)
83 (R)
97 (R)
80 (R)
99 (R)
70 (R)
60 (R)
nd
88 (R)
87 (R)
88 (R)
90 (R)
23 (R)
89 (R)
69 (R)
nd
d
e
0
f,g
the highly selective Pd-catalyzed Heck reactions. These
ligands provide a highly flexible ligand scaffold because they
can be easily tuned in two different regions (phosphite and
oxazoline substituents) to explore how they affect the
catalytic performance. In addition, the presence of a phos-
phite moiety is advantageous because the larger π-acceptor
11
THF
a
-2
[
Pd2(dba)3]‚dba (1.25 × 10 mmol), 1 (2.0 mmol), phenyl triflate (0.5
-
2
i
mmol), ligand (2.8 × 10 mmol), solvent (3 mL), Pr2NEt (1 mmol), T )
b
c
5
0 °C, t ) 24 h. Conversion percentages determined by GC. Enantio-
meric excesses measured by GC. T ) 75 °C. e T ) 25 °C, t ) 67 h. f t )
5 h. g Isolated yield of 2 was 86%.
d
1
6
ability of the phosphite moiety increases the reaction rates.
the formation of the expected product 2-phenyl-2,5-dihy-
drofuran 2 was favored toward the formation of 2-phenyl-
2,3-dihydrofuran 3.
Our results indicated that the solvent and the temperature
each affect both the activity and selectivity of the process.
The optimum tradeoff between activities and selectivities was
obtained using THF as solvent and a temperature of 50 °C.
(2) See for instance: (a) Loiseleur, O.; Meier, P.; Pfaltz, A. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 200. (b) Loiseleur, O.; Hayashi, M.;
Schmees, N.; Pfaltz, A. Synthesis 1997, 1338. (c) Tu, T.; Hou, X. L.; Dai,
L. X. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3651. (d) Gilbertson, S. R.; Xie, D.; Fu, Z. J.
Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 7240. (e) Gilbertson, S. R.; Fu, Z. Org. Lett. 2001,
3
, 161.
3) Di e´ guez, M.; P a` mies, O.; Claver, C. Chem. ReV. 2004, 104, 3189.
b) Di e´ guez, M.; P a` mies, O.; Ruiz, A.; D ´ı az, Y.; Castill o´ n, S.; Claver, C.
(
(
Coord. Chem. ReV. 2004, 248, 2165. (c) Di e´ guez, M.; Ruiz, A.; Claver, C.
Dalton Trans. 2003, 2957. (d) P a` mies, O.; Di e´ guez, M.; Ruiz, A.; Claver,
C. Chem. Today 2004, 12.
(6) van Strijdonck, G. P. F.; Boele, M. D. K.; Kamer, P. C. J.; de Vries,
J. G.; van Leeuwen, P. W. N. M. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 1999, 1073.
(7) Mata, Y.; Di e´ guez, M.; P a` mies, O.; Claver, C. AdV. Synth. Catal. In
press.
(8) Phosphorochloridites are easily prepared in one step from the
corresponding bisphenol as described in Buisman, G. J. H.; Kamer, P. C.
J.; van Leeuwen, P. W. N. M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1993, 4, 1625.
(9) Yonehara, K.; Hashizume, T.; Mori, K.; Ohe, K.; Uemura, S. J. Org.
Chem. 1999, 64, 9374.
(4) (a) Yonehara, K.; Mori, K.; Hashizume, T.; Chung, K. G.; Ohe, K.;
Uemura, S. J. Organomet. Chem. 2000, 603, 40. (b) Imbos, R.; Minnaard,
A. J.; Feringa, B. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 184.
(5) See for instance: (a) Di e´ guez, M.; P a` mies O.; Claver, C. Tetrahe-
dron: Asymmetry 2004, 15, 2113. (b) Di e´ guez, M.; P a` mies, O.; Ruiz, A.;
Claver, C. In Methodologies in Asymmetric Catalysis; American Chemical
Society: Washington, DC, 2004; Chapter 11 and references therein.
5598
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 25, 2005