FULL PAPERS
Preparation of an Immobilized Lipase-Palladium Artificial Metalloenzyme
stirring for 5 min. After that, to initialize the reaction, trie-
thylamine (0.057 mL, 0.412 mmol) was added. The final sus-
pension was left under magnetic stirring at 708C for the in-
dicated times.
Acknowledgements
This work has been sponsored by CSIC. M.F. thanks CSIC
for a JAE-Doc contract (“Junta para la Ampliacion de estu-
dios”) cofounded by ESF (European Social Fund). O.
Romero is grateful to CONICYT and Programa Bicentenario
Becas-Chile for financial support The authors also thank Dr.
Ramiro Martinez from Novozymes for the generous gift of li-
pases and Dr. Daminatti from Resindion for the gift of the
Sepabeads resin.
HPLC Monitoring of Heck Cross-Coupling Reaction
The reaction outcome was monitored by HPLC analysis of
samples of the reaction withdrawn at different times. The
analysis condition determinations were performed with
a Kromasil-C8 (1504.6 mm and 5 mm Ø), at a flow of
1 mLminÀ1; l=267 nm; and a mobile phase: 50% (v/v)
ACN in MilliQ water. The E configuration of achieved
product was confirmed by HPLC identity using the commer-
cial standards (provided as described in Materials) the Rts
being 8.4 min for Z-cis isomer and 9.4 min for E-trans
isomer. The yields were obtained by extrapolating the
values through a calibration curve of the E-products (R2 =
0.9975).
To confirm the suitability of the HPLC method, the final
reaction mixture was purified by silica gel chromatography.
In this case, as well as to perform the recyclability studies,
the reaction amounts were scaled up 5 times, maintaining
the reactant proportions described above. Hence, the reac-
tion performed under the best conditions [DMF in the pres-
ence of 25% (v/v) of distilled water], once it reached its
maximum conversion, was extracted with Et2O. The com-
bined filtrate was dried over anhydrous NaSO4, concentrat-
ed under reduced pressure and finally purified by silica-gel
chromatography (hexane). The purified yields were in
agreement with those obtained by HPLC (215.4 mg of pure
E-ethyl cinnamate, 99% yield).
References
[1] a) M. Durrenberger, T. R. Ward, Curr. Opin. Chem.
Biol. 2014, 19, 99–106; b) M. Genz, V. KÅhler, M.
Krauss, D. Singer, R. Hoffmann, T. R. Ward, N. Sträter,
ChemCatChem 2014, 6, 736–740.
[2] J. C. Lewis, ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 2954–2975.
[3] Y. Lu, N. Yeung, N. Sieracki, N. M. Marshall, Nature
2009, 460, 855–862.
[4] J. Bos, G. Roelfes, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2014, 19,
135–143.
[5] F. W. Monnard, E. S. Nogueira, T. Heinisch, T. Schirm-
er, T. R. Ward, Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 3269–3274.
[6] M. R. Ringenberg, T. R. Ward, Chem. Commun. 2011,
47, 8470–8476.
[7] C. A. Denard, J. F. Hartwig, H. Zhao, ACS Catal. 2013,
3, 2856–2864.
[8] M. T. Reetz, Chem. Rec. 2012, 12, 391–406.
[9] T. Reiner, D. Jantke, A. N. Marziale, A. Raba, J. Ep-
pinger, Chem. Open 2013, 2, 50–54.
[10] C. M. Thomas, T. R. Ward, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2005, 34,
337–346, and references cited therein.
Asymmetric Heck Cross-Coupling Reaction
[11] a) T. Ueno, H. Tabe, Y. Tanaka, Chem. Asian J. 2013, 8,
1646–1660; b) H. Inaba, S. Kanamaru, F. Arisaka, S. Ki-
tagawaa, T. Ueno, Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 11424–11427.
[12] D. K. Garner, L. Liang, D. A. Barrios, J.-L. Zhang, Y.
Lu, ACS Catal. 2011, 1, 1083–1089.
In a 1.5 mL screw-cap sealed vessel, 200 mg of SP-CAL-B-
C8-1 catalyst were added to a solution containing iodoben-
zene (0.0306 mL, 0.274 mmol) and 2,3-dihydrofuran
(0.041 mL, 0.55 mmol) in 1 mL of DMF/distilled water 75/25
solution. The mixture was preheated at 1208C under mag-
netic stirring for 5 min. After that, to initialize the reaction,
triethylamine (0.057 mL, 0.412 mmol) was added. The final
suspension was left under magnetic stirring at 1208C for the
indicated times.
[13] I. D. Petrik, J. Liu, Y. Lu, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.
2014, 19, 67–75.
[14] H. Yang, P. Srivastava, C. Zhang, J. C. Lewis, ChemBio-
Chem 2014, 15, 223–227.
[15] a) P. Adlercreutz, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 6406–6436;
b) J. Brabcova, M. Filice, M. Gutarra, J. M. Palomo,
Curr. Biol. Compd. 2013, 9, 113–136.
HPLC Monitoring of Asymmetric Heck Cross-
Coupling Reaction
[16] a) M. Filice, M. Marciello, M. d. P. Morales, J. M.
Palomo, Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 6876–6878; b) G.
Van Koten, J. Organomet. Chem. 2013, 730, 156–164.
[17] a) M. Filice, J. M. Palomo, ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 1588–
1598; b) K. Engstrom, E. V. Johnston, O. Verho, K. P.
Gustafson, M. Shakeri, C. W. Tai, J. E. Bäckvall,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 14006–14010.
[18] M. Filice, O. Romero, J. Gutierrez-Fernandez, B. de
Las Rivas, J. A. Hermoso, J. M. Palomo, Chem.
Commun. 2015, 51, 9324–9327.
The reaction outcome was monitored by HPLC analysis of
samples of the reaction withdrawn after 24 h. The analyses
were performed with a Kromasil-C4 (1504.6 mm and 5 mm
Ø), at a flow of 1 mLminÀ1; l=254 nm; and a mobile
phase: 50% (v/v) ACN in MilliQ water. The formation of
the product was confirmed by HPLC identity using the com-
mercial standards provided as described in Materials. The
yields were obtained by extrapolating the values through
a calibration curve (R2 =0.9912). To analyze the enantiose-
lectivity, the final reaction mixture was purified by silica gel
chromatography with pentane/Et2O (10:1 to 5:1) as a color-
less oil. The analysis conditions were: a Daicel Chiralcel OJ-
H, 98:2 n-hexane/isopropyl alcohol, flow rate=0.5 mLminÀ1
in agreement with the conditions reported in the litera-
ture.[28]
[19] J. C. Powers, J. L. Asgian, W. D. Ekici, K. E. James,
Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 4639–4750.
[20] C. A. Kruithof, M. A. Casado, G. Guillena, M. R.
Egmond, A. van der Kerk-van Hoof, A. J. R. Heck,
R. J. M. Klein Gebbink, G. van Koten, Chem. Eur. J.
2005, 11, 6869–6877.
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2015, 357, 2687 – 2696
ꢀ 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
2695