1
56
B. Horstmann et al. / Bioorganic Chemistry 57 (2014) 155–161
ꢁ1
ꢁ
1
fractions were analyzed on precoated silica gel plates (silica gel 60,
F254, 20 ꢀ 20 cm, 0.25 mm thick, Merck thin-layer chromatogra-
phy). Amino and Boc protected amino groups were stained by dip-
ping the TLC plate in a ninhydrin solution (0.66% m/v in EtOH)
following by heating or by absorbance of UV light at 254 nm.
NMR-spectra were recorded with an Avance 300 (AC300)
l mol cm ; 330 nm) and the predicted e of HDAH wild type
ꢁ1
ꢁ1
(wt) (43,890 l mol cm ; 280 nm).
2.2.5. Determination of IC50 values
To determine the inhibitory effect of the cis- and trans-configu-
ration of 4-PAM and AMDs (1a–e) on HDAH variant C51S activity,
dose–response curves were performed and IC50 values analyzed.
The HDAH C51S activity was determined by employing a fluores-
cence-based activity assay in a similar way as described previously
1
13
1
(
300 MHz H, 75 MHz C) and a Bruker DRX 500 (500 MHz H,
1
3
1
26 MHz C)-spectrometer. The chemical shift data for each signal
is given in units of d (ppm) relative to tetramethylsilane (TMS),
assigned d (TMS) = 0. Coupling constants (J) are stated in Hz.
HPLC–MS was performed with an Agilent Technologies Series
[
17,18]. 5 mM 4-PAM or AMD (1a–e) DMSO solutions were isomer-
ized to their cis-configuration by UV light irradiation (364 nm,
1
200 instrument using an Agilent Eclipse XDB-C18 column.
ꢁ2
4
3 mJ cm ) using a hand lamp as described before and serially
Method: 5–95% B from 2 to 17 min, 95–5% B from 20 to 25 min.
Solvent A: water + 0.1% formic acid; solvent B: acetonitrile + 0.1%
formic acid. The cis- and trans photoisomerization of AMDs (1a–e)
conjugated to HDAH variant M30C was verified by UV/Vis spec-
troscopy measurements in MC buffer (40 mM sodium phosphate,
diluted in FB188 buffer (15 mM Tris, 50 mM KH
2 4 2 4
PO /K HPO ,
2
50 mM NaCl, 250 M EDTA, 0.001% Pluronic F 68 and 0.005%
l
bovine serum albumin; pH 8.0). The trans-configuration of men-
tioned compounds was achieved by thermal relaxation of the seri-
ally diluted samples due to incubation at 30 °C for 5 h in the dark.
The HDAH catalyzed deacetylation reaction, in dependence on
increasing 4-PAM or AMD concentrations, was performed as a
one-step assay in the dark in black 96-well half-area microplates
1
50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.2) at 30 °C. A solution of 3 lM
of the respective AMD/HDAH M30C conjugate was irradiated by
UV light by use of a hand lamp (6 W, Heraeus) at 364 nm for
ꢁ
2
2
5 min at a distance of 6 cm (43 mJ cm ) or blue light (1 W,
(
flat bottom, polystyrene, medium binding; Greiner Bio-One) pro-
viding final concentrations of 100 nM HDAH variant C51S,
.5 mg/mL Trypsin from bovine pancreas (Serva) and 50 M BocLy-
ꢁ2
LED, Osram) at 464 nm for 25 min at a distance of 6 cm (1.5 J cm
)
to achieve the cis- or trans-configuration. UV/Vis spectra (280–
00 nm) of photoisomerized samples were subsequently recorded
with a UV/Vis spectrophotometer (Jasco V-630).
0
l
4
s(Ac)AMC (Bachem) as substrate. The fluorescence intensity of 7-
amino-4-methylcoumarin (AMC) was detected at 450 nm
(
350 nm excitation) over a period of 2 h at 30 °C and the HDAH
2
2
.2. Biochemical methods
C51S activity determined from the slope of the linear initial phase
of measured kinetics and expressed as relative fluorescence units
ꢁ1
.2.1. Employed HDAH variants
HDAH variant C51S was used to investigate the inhibitory effect
per second (RFU s ). The latter was correlated to the activity of
a sample of HDAH C51S where no compound was added (stated
as 100%), the activity expressed as percentages and plotted against
the log of applied compound concentration. Dose–response curves
were analyzed by the program GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Soft-
ware) using a three-parameter dose–response model and IC50-val-
ues determined in independent triplicates and specified as
means ± SD, n = 3. Dose–response curves of DMSO were equally
determined as described before using HDAH-wt to verify the real
inhibitory effect, induced by 4-PAM and AMDs (1a–e) on HDAH
activity. Additionally, a dose–response curve of a known histone
deacetylase inhibitor like suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA)
was tested on HDAH-wt activity to compare the inhibitory potency
with 4-PAM and AMDs. The dose–response curve of SAHA was per-
formed as a single determination by use of the above described
assay conditions and data points comparably analyzed by a
three-parameter dose–response model.
of the respective cis- and trans-configuration of (E)-1-(4-(phen-
yldiazenyl)phenyl)-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dione (4-PAM) and AMDs (1a–e)
by determination of IC50 values. HDAH variant M30C was used as
conjugate and test model to investigate the AMD dependent influ-
ence on the photoswitch capability with respect to the spacer
length. Both HDAH variants were generated by site-directed muta-
genesis, expressed in Escherichia coli strain XL1-blue and purified
as previously reported [7].
2.2.2. Modification of HDAH variant M30C
The single solvent accessible cysteine of HDAH variant M30C
was chemically modified by 4-PAM or AMDs (1a–e) by a 4-fold
molar excess in MC buffer (supplemented with 8% DMSO) and
the modification procedure continued as described previously [7].
2.2.3. Determination of Michaelis–Menten kinetics
The determination and analysis of Michaelis–Menten kinetics of
3. Experimental procedure
unmodified and AMD (1a–e) modified HDAH M30C variants,
ꢁ
2
photoisomerized to their cis- (UV light, 364 nm, 43 mJ cm ) and
3.1. Synthesis of AMD 1b–e
ꢁ
2
trans-configuration (blue light, 464 nm, 1.5 J cm ), was performed
as reported previously [7]. Pluronic F 68 was purchased from BASF
and bovine serum albumin from Sigma–Aldrich. Measurements
were performed as independent triple measurements and Michae-
The procedure of the synthesis of compounds 3c–e, 4c–e, 5c–e
1
13
and 7 as well as the H NMR and C NMR spectra of AMDs 1a–e
can be found in supplementary material.
lis–Menten parameters (K
dard deviation (SD), n = 3. The photoswitch efficiency of Vmax- and
-values, between the cis- and trans-configuration, was calcu-
lated as percentages by definition of the more active isomer.
m
and Vmax) represented as means ± stan-
3
.1.1. (E)-N-(2-(2,5-dioxo-2,5-dihydro-1H-pyrrol-1-yl)ethyl)-4-(phen-
K
m
yldiazenyl)benzamide (1b)
To a solution of 1-(2-aminoethyl)-1H-pyrrol-2,5-dione 2,2,2-
hydrochloride: (150 mg, 0.849 mmol) and TEA (350 lL, 2.50 mmol)
2
.2.4. DOL value determination
The DOL value (average number of conjugated AMD molecules
in THF (4 mL) was added (E)-perfluorophenyl 4-(phenyldiaze-
nyl)benzoat 7 (666 mg, 1.70 mmol) in THF (4 mL) dropwise. After
16 h at rt, the solvent was evaporated, the resulting residue was
per each HDAH variant M30C molecule) calculation of AMD/HDAH
M30C variant conjugates was performed as described previously
dissolved in CHCl
(30 mL) and brine (30 mL). The organic layer was dried over
Na SO , filtered and concentrated. The crude product was purified
by silica column (eluent EtOAc:hexane: 1:4 ? 1:1; R : 0.10 ? 0.50)
3 2
and washed with H O (30 mL), 1 M HCl
[
7] via Lambert–Beer equation by use of the determined molar
extinction coefficient of trans 4-PAM at its absorbance
maximum after conjugation to HDAH variant M30C (15,700
(e)
2
4
f