12
M. Lapteva et al. / Journal of Controlled Release 196 (2014) 9–18
2
.3.1. Quantification of CsA
2.6. Micelle CsA and Fluo-CsA content determination
For the quantification of CsA, a reverse phase column (Lichrospher
00, RP 18, 125*4.0 mm, 5 μm) was thermostated at 40 °C. The mobile
1
CsA or Fluo-CsA loading in the micelles was quantified as described
above (2.3.1 and 2.3.2, respectively). To ensure complete micelle de-
struction and release of the incorporated substance, 1:20, 1:50 1:100
dilutions were made for each formulation in either acetonitrile or
methanol for CsA or Fluo-CsA loaded micelles, respectively. The drug
content, drug loading and incorporation efficiency were calculated
using Eqs. (2)-(4), respectively:
phase consisted of a mixture of MeCN:phosphoric acid 0.1% buffer,
pH 3 (75:25) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. CsA was detected by its UV
absorbance at 230 nm. All standards and samples were prepared in
acetonitrile. The retention time of CsA was 6.2 min and the method
was validated (Supplementary Data) according to ICH and FDA guide-
lines [23,24]. The limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ)
were 0.57 and 1.72 μg/ml respectively.
Drug content ðmg drug= ml formulationÞ
mass of drug in the formulation ðmgÞ
2
.3.2. Quantification of Fluo-CsA
Quantification and purity testing of the newly synthesised com-
¼
ð2Þ
ð3Þ
ð4Þ
Volume of the formulation ðmlÞ
pound were performed using a Jupiter 5 μm, C4, 300 Å 150 × 4.60 mm
column heated at 30 °C. The mobile phase, comprised a 70:30 mixture
of MeOH:pH 8 buffer (5 mM K HPO , 5 mM TBAHS) and the flow rate
2 4
was 1 ml/min. The excitation and emission wavelengths of the fluo-
rescence detector were set at 490 nm and 514 nm, respectively. The
method was validated (Supplementary Data) according to ICH and
FDA guidelines [23,24]. The LOD and LOQ were 0.11 and 0.35 μg/ml,
respectively.
Drug loading ðmg drug=g copolymerÞ
drugꢀin the formulation ðmg=mlÞ
Copolymerꢀin the formulation ðg=mlÞ
½
¼
½
Incorporation efficiency ð%Þ
mass of drug incorporated into micelles ðmgÞ
¼
ꢁ 100
mass of drug introduced ðmgÞ
2
2
.4. Micelle preparation
.4.1. Preparation of CsA loaded micelles
2.7. Skin preparation
Micelles were prepared using the solvent evaporation method
[
25,26]. Briefly, CsA (8–32 mg) and the copolymer (20–80 mg) were
Porcine ear skin was used for the in vitro skin transport studies
27–29]. Ears were purchased from a local abattoir (CARRE, Rolle,
dissolved in 2 ml of acetone. This organic solution was then added
dropwise under sonication (Branson digital Sonifier® S-450D; Carouge,
Switzerland) into 4 ml of ultra-pure water. Acetone was then evapo-
rated with a rotary evaporator (Büchi RE 121 Rotavapor; Flawil,
Switzerland). The final copolymer concentration ranged from 5 to
[
Switzerland). After washing under running cold water, skin samples
with a thickness of ≈0.75 mm were harvested using a Zimmer® air
dermatome (Münsingen, Switzerland). Hairs were excised from the skin
surface using clippers. Discs with a diameter of 32 mm, corresponding
to the formulation application area, were punched out using a puncher
2
0 mg/ml. After equilibration overnight, the micelle solution was
centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 15 min (Eppendorf Centrifuge 5804;
Hamburg, Germany) to remove non-incorporated drug and the super-
natant was collected.
(Berg & Schmid HK 500, Urdorf, Switzerland) Skin samples were frozen
at −20 °C for a maximum period of 3 months. Prior to the experiment,
skin samples were thawed at room temperature and placed for 15 min
in 0.9% saline solution for rehydration.
Human skin samples were collected immediately after surgery from
the Department of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Geneva
University Hospital (Geneva, Switzerland). The study was approved by
the Central Committee for Ethics in Research (CER: 08-150 (NAC08-
2
.4.2. Preparation of Fluo-CsA loaded micelles
In the case of Fluo-CsA loaded micelles, the copolymer mixture
consisted of MPEG-dihexPLA and the fluorescent NR-MPEG-dihexPLA
copolymers (7:3) in 2 ml of acetone. Fluo-CsA (6.5 mg) was added to
this mixture. The micelles were prepared using the solvent evapora-
tion method described above. The final copolymer concentration was
0
51); Geneva University Hospital). Hypodermis and fatty tissue were
removed and discs corresponding to the permeation area were punched
out (Berg & Schmid HK 500; Urdorf, Switzerland). The skin discs (again
with a diameter of 32 mm) were subsequently horizontally sliced with a
Thomas Stadie-Riggs slicer (Thomas Scientific; Swedesboro, NJ, USA) to
obtain a thickness of ~0.8 mm. The skin was stored in a biobank at
5
mg/ml.
2
2
.5. Micelle formulation characterisation
.5.1. Size determination
The hydrodynamic diameter (Zav), polydispersity index (P.I.), volume-
−
20 °C for a maximum period of 3 months.
weighted and number-weighted diameter (d
measured using dynamic light scattering (DLS) with a Zetasizer HS
000 (Malvern Instruments Ltd.; Malvern, UK). Parameters were ob-
tained after three runs of ten measurements at an angle of 90° and a
temperature of 25 °C.
v n
and d ) of micelles were
2
.8. In vitro delivery experiments
3
Skin samples were mounted in standard Franz diffusion cells
2
(
area = 2 cm , Milian; Meyrin Switzerland). 500 mg of micelle formu-
lation or control were added to the donor compartment. The receptor
compartment (PBS pH 7.4 + 1% BSA, 10 ml) was stirred at 250 rpm at
room temperature during 1, 4, 8, 12 or 24 h. At the end of the experi-
ment, 1 ml of receptor phase was withdrawn to quantify permeation
of CsA. After centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 15 min permeation sam-
ples were analysed by HPLC. The diffusion cells were subsequently
dismantled and the skin samples were carefully washed for 5 s under
running water to remove the residual formulation from the stratum
corneum surface. The wash procedure was validated (Supplementary
Data). Skin samples were then cut into small pieces and deposited CsA
was extracted by soaking the skin in 4 ml of acetonitrile or methanol,
respectively, for 4 h with continuous stirring at room temperature.
2
.5.2. Morphology determination
Micelle morphology was characterised with transmission electron
microscopy (TEM) (Technai G2 20) using the negative staining method.
5
2
μl of the micelle solution was applied onto an ionised carbon-coated
00 mesh copper grid (0.3 Torr, 400 V for 20 s). The grid was then de-
posited for 1 s onto a 100 μl drop of a saturated uranyl acetate aqueous
solution and then onto a second 100 μl drop for 30 s. Excess staining
solution was removed and the grid was dried at room temperature
prior to insertion into the sample holder and TEM analysis. TEM images
were processed using Image J software (Image J 1.45 s).