Published on Web 04/14/2006
Origin of the Relative Stereoselectivity of the â-Lactam
Formation in the Staudinger Reaction
Lei Jiao, Yong Liang, and Jiaxi Xu*
Contribution from the Key Laboratory of Biooganic Chemistry and Molecular Engineering of
Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking UniVersity,
Beijing 100871, P. R. China
Received October 8, 2005; E-mail: jxxu@pku.edu.cn
Abstract: The relative (cis, trans) stereoselectivity of the â-lactam formation is one of the critical issues in
the Staudinger reaction. Although many attempts have been made to explain and to predict the
stereochemical outcomes, the origin of the stereoselectivity remains obscure. We are proposing a model
that explains the relative stereoselectivity based on a kinetic analysis of the cis/trans ratios of reaction
products. The results were derived from detailed Hammett analyses. Cyclic imines were employed to
investigate the electronic effect of the ketene substituents, and it was found that the stereoselectivity could
not be simply attributed to the torquoelectronic model. Based on our results, the origin of the relative
stereoselectivity can be described as follows: (1) the stereoselectivity is generated as a result of the
competition between the direct ring closure and the isomerization of the imine moiety in the zwitterionic
intermediate; (2) the ring closure step is most likely an intramolecular nucleophilic addition of the enolate
to the imine moiety, which is obviously affected by the electronic effect of the ketene and imine substituents;
(3) electron-donating ketene substituents and electron-withdrawing imine substituents accelerate the direct
ring closure, leading to a preference for cis-â-lactam formation, while electron-withdrawing ketene
substituents and electron-donating imine substituents slow the direct ring closure, leading to a preference
for trans-â-lactam formation; and (4) the electronic effect of the substituents on the isomerization is a minor
factor in influencing the stereoselectivity.
Introduction
one; (2) the reaction is initiated by the nucleophilic attack of
an imine to a ketene, giving rise to a zwitterionic intermediate;
The Staudinger reaction (the [2 + 2] ketene-imine cycload-
dition reaction) is regarded as one of the most fundamental and
versatile methods for the synthesis of â-lactam (2-azetidinone)
derivatives,1 which are important in both pharmaceutical and
synthetic chemistry.2,3 Many experimental and theoretical
investigations into the Staudinger reaction have been presented
during the past decades,4,5 and the most widely accepted reaction
process is described as follows:6 (1) the ketene-imine cycload-
dition reaction is a stepwise reaction rather than a concerted
(3) a conrotatory electrocyclic ring closure of the zwitterionic
intermediate produces the final â-lactam product. The reaction
of a monosubstituted ketene with an acyclic imine produces
two new stereocenters (C3 and C4 in the â-lactam ring), so the
product might be cis-, trans-, or a mixture of cis- and trans-
â-lactam derivatives. Thus, the relative (cis, trans) stereoselec-
tivity is considered as one of the critical issues in the Staudinger
reaction.6 However, the pathway for the formation of cis- and
trans-â-lactams has not been well understood to date. Many
possible stereochemical processes have been proposed in
previous investigations4d,4f-g,5b-c,5e,6 (Scheme 1), but each of
them only focused on the Staudinger reaction involving a
particular ketene or imine and failed to provide a universal
explanation for the observed complicated stereochemical out-
comes.
(1) For recent reviews on syntheses of â-lactam, see: (a) Van der Steen, F.
H.; van Koten, G. Tetrahedron 1991, 47, 7503-7524. (b) Palomo, C.;
Aizpurua, J. M.; Ganboa, I.; Oiarbide, M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 3223-
3235. (c) Singh, G. S. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 7631-7649.
(2) (a) Chemistry and Biology of â-Lactam Antibiotics; Morin, R. B.; Gorman,
M., Eds.; Academic Press: 1982; Vols. 1-3. (b) Southgate, R.; Branch,
C.; Coulton, S.; Hunt, E. In Recent progress in the Chemical Synthesis of
Antibiotics and Related Microbital Products; Luckacs, G., Ed.; Springer-
Verlag: Berlin, 1993; Vol. 2, p 621. (c) Southgate, R. Contemp. Org. Synth.
1994, 1, 417.
(3) For a review, see: The Organic Chemistry of â-Lactams; Georg, G. I.,
Ed.; Verlag Chemie: New York, 1993.
(5) (a) Sordo, J. A.; Gonza´lez, J.; Sordo, T. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114,
6249-6251. (b) Cossio, F. P.; Ugalde, J. M.; Lopez, X.; Lecea, B.; Palomo,
C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 995-1004. (c) Arrieta, A.; Ugalde, J.
M.; Cossio, F. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 4465-4468. (d) Cossio, F.
P.; Arrieta, A.; Lecea, B.; Ugalde, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116,
2085-2093. (e) Arrieta, A.; Lecea, B.; Cossio, F. P. J. Org. Chem. 1998,
63, 5869-5876. (f) Arrieta, A.; Cossio, F. P.; Fernandez, I.; Gomez-Gallego,
M.; Lecea, B.; Mancheno, M. J.; Sierra, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 11509-11510. (g) Venturini, A.; Gonza´lez, J. J. Org. Chem. 2002,
67, 9089-9092.
(4) (a) Moore, H. W.; Hernandez, L., Jr.; Chambers, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1978, 100, 2245-2247. (b) Pacansky, J.; Chang, J. S.; Brown, D. W.;
Schwarz, W. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 2233-2234. (c) Moore, H. W.;
Hughes, G.; Srinivasachar, K.; Fernandez, M.; Nguyen, N. V.; Schoon,
D.; Tranne, A. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 4231-4238. (d) Brady, W. T.;
Gu, Y. Q. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 2838-2842. (e) Lynch, J. E.; Riseman,
S. M.; Laswell, W. L.; Tschaen, D. M.; Volante, R.; Smith, G. B.; Shinkai,
I. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 3792-3796. (f) Hegedus, L. S.; Montgomery,
J.; Narukawa, Y.; Snustad, D. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 5784-
5791. (g) Georg, G. I.; He, P.; Kant, J.; Wu, Z. J. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58,
5771-5778.
(6) Georg, G. I.; Ravikumar, V. T. In The Organic Chemistry of â-Lactams;
Georg, G. I., Ed.; Verlag Chemie: New York, 1993; pp 295-368 and
references therein.
9
6060
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2006, 128, 6060-6069
10.1021/ja056711k CCC: $33.50 © 2006 American Chemical Society