A. Chadha, B. Baskar / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 13 (2002) 1461–1464
1463
Table 2. Deracemisation of a-hydroxy acid esters with C.
parapsilosis (ATCC 7330)
shaker at 200 rpm, 25°C. Resting cells used for the
biotransformation were harvested after 24 h, cen-
trifuged and used as a suspension in sterile distilled
water.
Entry Compound
Yield (%) Time (h) Configuration
1
2
3
4
n=0; R=Me* 70
n=0; R=Et* 74
n=2; R=Me* 73
n=2; R=Et 85–90
1
1
1
1
S
S
S
S
4.3. A typical biotransformation experiment
Racemic 2-hydroxy-4-phenylbutanoic acid ethyl ester (3
mg; 0.014 mmol)) in organic solvent (0.1 ml) was added
to an aqueous (sterile distilled water) suspension (0.2g/
ml wet weight) of resting cells of C. parapsilosis (ATCC
7330). The final reaction volume was 1.0 ml. The
reaction mixture was incubated at 25°C in an orbital
shaker (200 rpm) for 1 h after which time the cells were
separated and the product extracted into ether, concen-
trated and analysed for enantiomeric purity and chemi-
cal yield. Appropriate control experiments were carried
out using (a) cells in the reaction medium without the
substrate and (b) substrate in the reaction medium
without cells. The HPLC profile of the first control
experiment revealed that nothing from the cells on
extraction co-eluted with the product. The second con-
trol experiment indicated that the substrate did not give
any products in water. The other three esters were also
used as substrates in a similar manner.
* 100 mg of the substrate was used.
esters, was analysed on HPLC using a chiral column,
Chiracel OD from Daicel, Japan. The mobile phase
used was hexane:isopropanol:trifluoro acetic acid
(99:1:0.1) @ 2 ml/min monitored at 254 nm for all the
four acid esters. The retention times for the four
racemic acid esters were: 2-hydroxy-4-phenylbutanoic
acid ethyl ester (9.05 and 13.99 min); 2-hydroxy-4-
phenylbutanoic acid methyl ester (10.05 and 14.65 min);
ethyl mandelate (10.27 and 19.14 min); and methyl
mandelate (10.27 and 19.23 min). For comparison, an
enantiomerically pure standard was used and it was
found that the (S)-enantiomer was the early eluting
enantiomer in all the four acid esters.
4.4. Time course of the reaction
The reaction mixture as given above in a typical bio-
transformation experiment was incubated at 25°C in an
orbital shaker (200 rpm) for different intervals of time.
After incubation the samples were withdrawn, the cells
separated by centrifugation and the supernatant
extracted and analysed for enantiomeric purity. The
time of the reaction was optimised based on the enan-
tiomeric purity of the product (Table 1).
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the Department of Science
and Technology, India (SP/SI/G-06/99). We thank Dr.
Uday Avalakki for discussions regarding the
microorganism.
4.5. Isolation and characterisation of the products
References
The biotransformation of 2-hydroxy-4-phenylbutanoic
acid ethyl ester was carried out for 1 h (>99% e.e.) on
300 mg (1.44 mmol) and 500 mg (2.4 mmol) scale. The
product was extracted into diethyl ether, dried and
concentrated. This gave isolated yields of 255 mg (1.22
mmol) and 450 mg (2.16 mmol), respectively (85–90%
yield). This concentrated sample was used for HPLC
1. Copolla, G. M.; Schuster, H. F. h-Hydroxy acids in
Enantioselective Syntheses; VCH: Weinheim, 1997.
2. Zhang, W.; Wang, P. G. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 4732–
4735.
3. Aladro, F. J.; Guerra, F. M.; Moreno-Dorado, F. J.;
Bustamante, J. M.; Jorge, Z. D.; Massanet, G. M. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 2000, 41, 3209–3213.
1
analysis to determine its enantiomeric purity. The H
NMR of ethyl ester of 2-hydroxy-4-phenyl butanoic
acids is as follows: (TMS in CDCl3): l 1.25 (t, 3H),
1.85–2.22 (m, 2H), 2.75 (t, 2H), 4.25 (dd, 1H), 4.10–
4.30 (q, 2H) and 7.10–7.30 (m, 5H). The other three
substrates were compared with the standards by HPLC
and their yields are reported in Table 2. NMR of the
standard methyl ester of 2-hydroxy-4-phenylbutanoic
acid is as follows: (TMS in CDCl3): l 1.75–2.15 (m,
2H), 2.7 (t, 2H), 3.8 (s, 3H), 4.12 (dd, 1H) and 7.1–7.4
4. Burk, M. J.; Kalberg, C. S.; Pizzano, A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1998, 120, 4345–4353.
5. (a) Adam, W.; Lazarus, M.; Saha-Moller, C. R.; Schreier,
P. Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 837–845; (b) Groger, H.
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2001, 343, 547–558.
6. Schmidt, E.; Blaser, H. U.; Fauquex, P. F.; Seidelmeier,
G.; Spindler, F. In Microbial Reagents in Organic Synthe-
sis; Servi, S., Ed.; Kluwer Academic: The Netherlands,
1992; pp. 377–388.
7. Dao, D. H.; Kawai, Y.; Hida, K.; Hornes, S.; Nakamura,
K.; Ohno, A.; Okamura, M.; Akasaka, T. Bull. Chem.
Soc. Jpn. 1998, 71, 425–432.
1
(m, 5H). The H NMR data for the standard methyl
and ethyl esters of mandelic acid were as reported.28,29
4.6. Determination of e.e. of the product formed
8. Chadha, A.; Manohar, M.; Soundararajan, T.;
Lokeswari, T. S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1996, 7, 1571–
1572.
The product from the biotransformation of 2-hydroxy-
4-phenylbutanoic acid ethyl ester and the other three