Journal of the American Chemical Society
Communication
and 307.7 eV. While the 3d orbital peaks of iodides in H-
CMOP-Me were observed at 631.8 and 620.5 eV, those of the
iodo ligands in H-CMOP-Rh shifted to 630.4 and 618.5 eV. In
comparison, the 3d orbital peaks of iodo ligands in the Model-
Rh were observed at 630.1 and 618.8 eV. Energy-dispersive X-
ray spectroscopy-based elemental mapping confirmed the
homogeneous distribution of Rh species in H-CMOP-Rh
The amounts of triazoles, triazoliums, and mesoionic
carbenes in H-CMOP, H-CMOP-Me, and H-CMOP-Rh
were analyzed to be 3.76 mmol/g (15.8 wt % N), 3.16
mmol/g (13.3 wt % N), and 2.2 mmol/g (9.3 wt % N),
respectively. The Cu residues in H-CMOP were measured to
be 0.28 wt % by inductively coupled plasma (ICP) analysis.
The content of Rh in H-CMOP-Rh was measured to be 8.63
wt % (0.849 mmol/g), corresponding to the 38% PSM of
triazoliums. Thermogravimetric analysis showed that the H-
Considering the mesoionic carbene−Rh species and
chemical stability of H-CMOP-Rh, we studied its heteroge-
neous catalytic activities in the polymerization of arylacetylenes
(Table 1). Recently, poly(phenylacetylene) (PPA) has
attracted the significant attention of scientists.37−42 While the
PPA has been prepared by various metal catalysts, Rh
complexes have shown high synthetic efficiencies.43−46
However, Rh-based heterogeneous catalytic systems are
relatively rare.47−51
First, we scanned the amount of catalyst. As the amount of
H-CMOP-Rh decreased from 1.2 mol % Rh to 0.60, 0.30, 0.12,
and 0.060 mol % Rh, the isolated yields of PPAs decreased
from 99% to 96, 76, 64, and 24% with the changes of molecular
weights (Mn) from 32100 to 40900, 41300, 42800, and 39300,
respectively (entries 1−5 in Table 1). The stereoselectivities of
cis-transoid PPA were analyzed to be 98−99%.52 We selected
the 0.60 mol % H-CMOP-Rh as an optimal catalyst amount. In
a control test, 0.60 mol % Model-Rh showed a 10% isolated
yield of PPA. The enhanced polymerization of phenylacetylene
in nanospaces53,54 and the extrusion polymerization by
mesoporous catalysts have been reported.55
The H-CMOP-Rh (0.60 mol % Rh) could be recycled.
When the recovered H-CMOP-Rh was used, the PPAs were
obtained with the isolated yields of 92, 96, 94, and 91% and the
Mn values of 42200, 48400, 50500, and 54100 at the 2nd, 3rd,
4th, and 5th runs, respectively (entries 6−9 in Table 1). After
the removal of H-CMOP-Rh through filtration, the Rh was not
detected in the reaction mixture and the reaction did not
proceed, indicating the heterogeneous nature of the catalytic
reactions (Figure S8). SEM, TEM, XPS, IR, and 13C NMR
studies of the H-CMOP-Rh recovered after the fifth reaction
showed that the original hollow morphologies and mesoionic
carbene Rh species were retained (Figure S9).
Next, we studied the polymerization of arylacetylenes
bearing substituents. When we used (4-bromophenyl)-
acetylene, insoluble polymer was obtained (entry 10 in Table
bromophenyl)acetylene and phenylacetylene, soluble polymer
(Mn of 35200) was obtained with an isolated yield of 70%
(entry 11 in Table 1, Figure S11). In comparison, when we
used the (4-methoxyphenyl)acetylene, polymer was obtained
with a yield of 3% (Mn of 5700) (entry 12 in Table 1). We
suggest that the different activities of H-CMOP-Rh toward (4-
bromophenyl)acetylene and (4-methoxyphenyl)acetylene re-
sult from an initiation step of polymerization. Recently,
Morokuma et al. reported mechanistic studies of the Rh-
catalyzed polymerization of phenylacetylene.56 Among three
mechanistic candidatesRh(I) insertion, Rh(III) insertion,
and Rh−carbene metathesis mechanismsthe Rh(I) insertion
was suggested as the most favorable pathway. In this regard,
the catalytic mechanism of H-CMOP-Rh is suggested in Figure
S12. To initiate the polymerization, the anionic arylethynyl
ligand should be incorporated into Rh through the
deprotonation of arylacetylene. We speculate that the initiation
of polymerization by (4-methoxyphenyl)acetylene would be
relatively slow due to its relatively less acidic feature of the
terminal proton.
Table 1. Synthesis of Poly(Arylacetylene)s by H-CMOP-
a
Rh
b
c
cat.
(mol %)
yield (S )
entry
Ar
(%)
Mn
PDI
1
2
3
4
5
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
1.2
99 (99)
96 (98)
76 (98)
64 (99)
24 (99)
92 (99)
96 (96)
94 (96)
91 (99)
32100
40900
41300
42800
39300
42200
48400
50500
54100
−
35200
5700
6000
2.59
2.47
2.51
2.76
2.84
2.70
2.53
2.34
2.33
0.60
0.30
0.12
0.060
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
d
6
e
7
f
8
g
9
Ph
4-BrPh
h
h
h
10
11
12
13
14
89 (− )
−
i
When we used the 5:1 and 1:1 mixtures of (4-methoxy-
phenyl)acetylene and phenylacetylene as monomer systems,
the isolated yields of polymer increased to 21% (Mn of 6000)
and 85% (Mn of 21100), respectively (entries 13 and 14 in
4-BrPh:Ph (1:1)
4-MeOPh
4-MeOPh:Ph (5:1)
4-MeOPh:Ph (1:1)
Ph
70 (96)
3.04
2.01
1.92
2.24
2.37
3 (96)
j
21 (99)
k
85 (96)
21100
21000
l
15
37 (86)
While the features of PPA have been extensively
investigated, the copolymers bearing substituted arylacetylenes
have been relatively less explored.57−59 In this regard, the
optical properties of PPA, copolymer of (4-bromophenyl)-
acetylene and phenylacetylene (PBrPAPA), and copolymer of
(4-methoxyphenyl)acetylene and phenylacetylene (PMeOPA-
PA) were studied (Figure S11). While the PPA and the
PMeOPAPA showed two absorption bands at 328 and 388
nm, the absorptions of the PBrPAPA at 320−400 nm were
significantly reduced. Interestingly, the emissions of PBrPAPA
a
Reaction conditions: arylacetylene (2.28 mmol), H-CMOP-Rh (16
b
c
mg for 0.60 mol % Rh), rt, THF, 18 h. Isolated yield. Contents of
cis-transoid polymers.52 The catalyst recovered from entry 2 was
d
e
f
used. The catalyst recovered from entry 6 was used. The catalyst
recovered from entry 7 was used. The catalyst recovered from entry 8
was used. Insoluble polymers were obtained. The 1:1.18 ratio of 4-
bromophenyl and phenyl in copolymer. The 1:0.21 ratio of 4-
methoxyphenyl and phenyl in copolymer. The 1:1.39 ratio of 4-
methoxyphenyl and phenyl in copolymer. Nonhollow CMOP-Rh (34
mg for 0.60 mol % Rh) was used.
g
h
i
j
k
l
4102
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 4100−4105