Arch. Pharm. Pharm. Med. Chem. 2001, 334, 332–334
Antinociceptive properties of chalcones 333
Experimental
Y
O
C
O
C
O
C
H
CH3
+
B
CH CH
1) NaOH/EtOH
2) AcOH/H
A
Synthesis: general procedures
O
2
X
Y
X
Compounds 1–11 were obtained by reaction of acetophenone
and benzaldehyde (1:1) in the presence of sodium hydroxide
and ethanol and further addition to cool diluted acetic acid,
according the methodology previously described[8]. The re-
spective products were purified by recrystallization or column
chromatography over silica gel. All the compounds were syn-
thesized in good yields (55–98%) and characterized by
1H NMR, IR and microanalyses. The purity of these compounds
was determined by TLC using several solvent systems of dif-
ferent polarity.
X=4-Br; Y=H (1)
X= 3,4-Cl ; Y= H (2)
2
X= 3,4-Cl ; Y= 4-N(CH
) (3)
3 2
2
X= Y= H (4)
X= Y= 4-Cl (5)
X= 3,4-Cl ; Y= 4-Cl (6)
2
X= 4-CH ; Y= 4-Cl (7)
3
X= H; Y= 4-Cl (8)
X= 4-Br; Y= 4-Cl (9)
X= 4-CH ; Y= H (10)
3
X= 4-Cl; Y=H (11)
Scheme
ID50 values of 9.0 and 13.0 µmol/kg, and maximal inhibition
of 91 and 93%, respectively. They were about 14-fold more
active than aspirin and paracetamol and about 4-fold more
potent than diclofenac in the writhing test. It should be noted
that the introduction of a methyl group (chalcone 10) in-
stead of halogen atoms in the ring A considerably de-
creased the antinociceptive potency, suggesting that
electron-withdrawing groups but not electron-donor groups
increase the antinociceptive effect. This hypothesis may be
supported by the activity of compound 1, which was about
3-fold more active than compound 10. However, other
additional studies are required to confirm such observation.
Although both bromine or chloro atoms present in the
position 4 of ring A improve the pharmacological effect, the
latter seems to be more effective, indicating that a steric
parameter is also involved in the antinociceptive activity of
these compounds. In addition, preliminary evaluation of the
hydrophobicity by using the periodic box method by Hyper
Chem indicated that this parameter is not related with the
antinociceptive activity of these compounds.
Physico-chemical data of synthesized compounds
Compound (1): 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, ppm): 7.27 (d, 1H,
CH=CH), 7.38 (d, 1H, CH=CH, J = 15.63), 7.51–7.75 (m, 9H,
Ar); FT-IR (KBr disk, cm–1): 1660 (ν -C=O), 1605 (ν -C=C-); mp
(°C): 155–160; Yield: 54.8%.
Compound (2): 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6 , ppm): 7.27 (d, 1H,
CH=CH), 7.39 (d, 1H, CH=CH, J = 15.70), 7.50–7.93 (m, 8H,
Ar); FT-IR (KBr disk, cm–1): 1661 (ν -C=O), 1605 (ν -C=C-); mp
(°C): 96–100; Yield: 68%.
Compound (3): 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, ppm): 3.01 (s, 6H, N-
(CH3)2), 7.28 (d, 1H, CH=CH), 7.41 (d, 1H, CH=CH, J = 15.71),
7.51–7.75 (m, 7H, Ar); FT-IR (KBr disk, cm–1): 1649 (ν -C=O),
1612 (ν -C=C-); mp (°C): 124–126; Yield: 85%.
Compound (4): 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, ppm): 6.38 (d, 1H,
CH=CH), 6.89 (d, 1H, CH=CH, J = 15.72), 7.25–7.76 (m, 10 H,
Ar); FT-IR (KBr disk, cm–1): 1661 (ν -C=O), 1605 (ν -C=C-); mp
(°C): 119–122; Yield: 77%.
Compound (5):1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, ppm): 7.28 (d, 1H,
CH=CH), 7.42 (d, 1H, CH=CH, J = 15.71), 7.47–7.87 (m, 8H,
Ar); FT-IR (KBr disk, cm–1): 1657 (ν -C=O), 1605 (ν -C=C-), mp
(°C): 160–163; Yield: 89%.
In view of the interesting antinociceptive activity of chalcone
2, it was analysed by the formalin-induced pain test, which
defines two distinct periods of response, i.e., “early re-
sponse (neurogenic pain)” and “late response (inflamma-
tory pain)”. It dose-dependently prevented only the late
phase of the formalin test, like the standard drugs. The
calculated ID50 value was 111.5 (50.5–243.7) µmol/kg with
maximal inhibition of 82%, being equipotent to aspirin and
acetaminophen, which presented ID50 of approximately
120 µmol/kg in relation to the second phase of the formalin
Compound (6): 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, ppm): 7.29 (d, 1H,
CH=CH), 7.43 (d, 1H, CH=CH, J = 15.69), 7.54–7.94 (m, 7H,
Ar); FT-IR (KBr disk, cm–1): 1661 (ν -C=O), 1602 (ν -C=C-); mp
(°C): 120–123; Yield: 96%.
Compound (7): 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, ppm): 2.43 (s, 3H, CH3),
7.51 (d, 1H, CH=CH), 7.41 (d, 1H, CH=CH, J = 15.70), 7.44–
7.80 (m, 8H, Ar); FT-IR (KBr disk, cm–1): 1657 (ν -C=O), 1605
(ν -C=C-); mp (°C): 159–162; Yield: 80%.
test [7]
.
Compound (8): 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, ppm): 7.28 (d, 1H,
CH=CH), 7.42 (d, 1H, CH=CH, J = 15.71), 7.25–7.76 (m, 9H,
Ar); FT-IR (KBr disk, cm–1): 1658 (ν -C=O), 1604 (ν -C=C-); mp
(°C): 122–125; Yield: 74%.
The mechanism by which the chalcones exert antinocicep-
tive action still remains undetermined, but chemical and
pharmacological studies are currently in progress in our
laboratories and the results will be published elsewhere.
Compound (9): 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, ppm): 7.28 (d, 1H,
CH=CH), 7.43 (d, 1H, CH=CH, J = 15.69), 7.54–7.75 (m, 8H,
Ar); FT-IR (KBr disk, cm–1): 1657 (ν -C=O), 1604 (ν -C=C-); mp
(°C): 168–170; Yield: 97%.
Considering that only a few authors have demonstrated the
antinociceptive activity of chalcones and the level of current
interest in discovering other medicinal agents to treat pain
processes, we believe that some compounds, such as
chalcones 2 and 11, might be further used as models to
obtain new more potent and/or selective analgesic drugs.
Compound (10): 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6,ppm): 2.42 (s, 3H, CH3),
7.93 (d, 1H, CH=CH), 7.37 (d, 1H, CH=CH, J = 15.65), 7.43–
7.79 (m, 9H, Ar); FT-IR (KBr disk, cm–1): 1656 (ν -C=O), 1596
(ν -C=C-); mp (°C): 95.6–100; Yield: 96%.
Compound (11): 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, ppm): 7.28 (d, 1H, CH=CH);
7.39 (d, 1H, CH=CH, J = 15.72), 7.47–7.78 (m, 9H, Ar); FT-IR (KBr
disk, cm–1): 1661 (ν -C=O), 1606 (ν -C=C-); mp (°C): 85–92; Yield:
98%.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from CNPq and ProP-
PEx/UNIVALI.