Asymmetric Fluorination of Enolates
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 63, No. 7, 1998 2279
ing metal enolate chelation with the sulfonyl oxygens.43,46
(1R-exo)-(-)-2-(N,N-diflu or oam in o)-7,7-dim eth ylbicyclo-
2.2.1]h ep ta n e-1-m eth a n esu lfon yl F lu or id e (7). This com-
pound was isolated as a byproduct of the fluorination of (+)-
[
However, enolate fluorinations in the presence of HMPA,
known to disrupt metal chelation,47 failed to diminish the
2
0
5
b (10%): mp 105-106 °C; [R]
D
) -20.2 (c ) 1.4, CHCl
3
);
) δ 1.12
s, 3 H), 1.40 (s, 3 H), 1.93-2.12 (m, 2 H), 2.32-2.40 (m, 1 H),
2.61-2.64 (m, 1 H), 3.33-3.42 (m, 1 H), 3.76-3.82 (m, 1 H),
ee of 9a (Table 2: entry 7).
-1
1
IR (KBr) cm 2992, 1492, 1407, 1210; H NMR (CDCl
3
In summary electrophilic asymmetric fluorination of
tertiary enolates by N-fluoro-2,10-camphorsultams 3
afforded quaternary R-fluoro carbonyl compounds in
modest yield and ee. The sense of asymmetric induction
exhibited by these reagents is opposite that for the closely
related (camphorylsulfonyl)oxaziridine 4 hydroxylating
reagents.
(
1
3
4.37 (m, 2 H); C NMR (CDCl
52.0, 52.3, 62.4, 90.4 (m); 19F NMR (CDCl
13.7 Hz, J
dd, J
3
) δ 22.6, 23.0, 24.7, 30.7, 51.9,
) δ -144.5 (dd, J
) 33 Hz, 1 F), -147.1 (t, J ) 8.8 Hz, 1 F), -164.2
) 613.7 Hz, J ) 24.2 Hz, 1 F). Anal. Calcd for C10
NO S: C, 35.31; H, 4.15. Found: C, 35.42; H, 4.04.
+)-N-F lu or o-2,10-(3,3-d im eth oxyca m p h or su lta m ) (3c).
3
1
)
6
2
(
1
2
14
H -
Cl
2
F
3
2
(
The typical procedure for the preparation of (+)-3b was
followed, eluant: Et O/n-pentane, 50:50; yield 34%; mp 154-
56 °C, [R]20
Exp er im en ta l Section
2
-1
1
D
3
+49.6 (c 1.0, CHCl ); IR (KBr) cm 3006.5,
1342.1, 1156.8, 106.4; H NMR (CDCl ) δ 0.87 (s, 3 H), 1.27
1
Gen er a l P r oced u r e. Column chromatography was per-
formed on silica gel, Merck grade 60 (230-400 mesh). Ana-
lytical and preparative thin-layer chromatography was per-
formed on precoated silica gel plates (250 and 1000 µm)
purchased from Analtech Inc. TLC plates were visualized with
UV, in an iodine chamber or with phosphomolybdic acid unless
noted otherwise. THF was freshly distilled under nitrogen
from a purple solution of sodium and benzophenone. Elemen-
tal analyses were performed in the Department of Chemistry,
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
3
(s, 3 H), 1.55-1.91 (m, 5 H), 2.19 (d, J ) 4.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.06-
3.42 (m, 2 H), 3.18 (s, 3H), 3.29 (s, 3 H); 13C NMR (CDCl ) δ
3
108.3, 76.4, 76.3, 50.0, 48.3, 48.2, 48.0, 46.9, 46.8, 33.5, 21.0,
20.6; 19F NMR (CDCl ) δ -55.6 (d, J ) 44.0 Hz). Anal. Calcd
3
for C H FNO S: C, 49.13; H, 6.87. Found: C, 49.04; H, 7.25.
1
2
20
4
Deter m in a tion of En a n tiom er ic P u r ity. The enantio-
meric purity of the R-fluoro carbonyl compounds were deter-
mined by chiral shift reagent experiments using increasing
amounts of [(3-heptafluoropropyl)hydroxymethylene)-(+)-cam-
3
Substrates 8 were purchased from Aldrich Chemical Co. and
used without additional purification unless otherwise noted.
Sultams 5a -c were prepared by reduction of the corresponding
phorato]europium(III) [Eu(hfc) ].
Gen er a l P r oced u r e for Asym m etr ic F lu or in a tion of
Ca r bon yl En ola tes 8 Usin g N-F lu or o Ca m p h or su lta m s
(
4
camphorsulfonyl)imines 6 with NaBH as previously de-
(
3). In a 25-mL oven-dried two-necked round-bottomed flask
2
7,48
scribed.
fitted with an argon bubbler, a rubber septum, and a magnetic
stirring bar was placed 3 mL of freshly distilled THF contain-
ing 0.4 mmol of 3. The reaction flask was cooled to -78 °C
(dry ice-acetone bath), and 0.6 mL (0.6 mmol, 1.5 equiv based
on the carbonyl compound) of a 1.0 M solution of either LDA,
NaHMDS, or KHMDS in THF was added. The mixture was
then stirred for 5 min at -78 °C, warmed to 0 °C, stirred for
an additional 45 min, and cooled to -78 °C. A solution of the
N-fluorocamphorsultam 3 (1.1 mmol) in 3 mL of THF was
quickly added to the reaction mixture. After the reaction was
complete, as indicated by TLC, the reaction mixture was
Fluorinations was carried out in the apparatus recom-
mended by Matheson Gas Products for the handling of dilute
concentrations of F /N . For a related apparatus see ref 49.
2 2
Ca u tion : Flu or in e is a poison ou s, cor r osive ga s wh ich
is a power fu l oxid a n t.
(
+)-N-F lu or o-2,10-(3,3-d ich lor oca m p h or su lt a m ) (3b).
In a 50 mL two-necked round-bottomed flask fitted with a
Teflon septum, a Teflon adapter with a Teflon outlet tube
attached to a soda lime tower, and a Teflon O-ring to hold the
Teflon tube was placed a solution of 3.0 g (10.6 mmol) of (+)-
2
,10-(3,3-dichlorocamphorsultam) (5b) in dry chloroform (50
4
quenched by addition of aqueous NH Cl (3 mL), ether (10 mL)
mL). To this solution was added 2.1 g (50 mmol) of NaF, dried
overnight under high vacuum. The reaction flask was cooled
to -40 °C (dry ice-acetonitrile bath), and dry nitrogen gas
at -78 °C was added, and the solution was warmed to room
temperature. The aqueous layer was extracted with ether (2
× 5 mL), the combined organic phases were washed with water
was passed into the solution. After 10 min, the N
stopped and fluorine gas (10% in N ) was introduced into the
solution. The flow rate of F was maintained at 60 mL/min,
2
flow was
4
(10 mL), brine (10 mL) and dried (MgSO ), and concentrated
2
to give an oil that was purified by preparative TLC (8% EtOAc
in pentane). Products were identified by comparison with
authentic samples and/or literature values.
2
and the reaction was continued until complete as indicated
by TLC (1.0-1.5 h). The fluorine gas flow was stopped, and
(-)-2-F lu or o-2-m eth yl-1-tetr a lon e (9a ): (50%), oil, 76%
2
the reaction mixture was purged with N for 15 min. The
ee [R]20 ) -21.5 (c 1.6, CHCl ); CD spectrum: molecular
D
3
solution was filtered, and the filtrate was washed with 20 mL
of CHCl and concentrated to give an oil which was purified
by column chromatography (CH Cl /n-pentane eluant, 70:30)
to give 2.13 g (67%) of (+)-3b: mp 161-162 °C; [R]
ellipticity [Q] (c 3.21, C H OH), 21 °C; [Q] -2833°; 19F NMR
2
5
325
3
(CDCl ) δ -154.4 (m). Its spectral properties were in agree-
3
ment with literature values.50,51
2
2
2
0
D
) +16.4
); IR (KBr) cm 2990, 1407, 1279, 1197, 1065;
(
+)-2-Ca r bom eth oxy-2-flu or o-1-tetr a lon e (9b): (90%),
-
1
(
c ) 1.3, CHCl
3
20
oil; 41% ee, [R]
D
) +6.12 (c 2.0, CHCl
3
); IR (NaCl) 1765 and
) δ 2.51-2.85 (m, 2 H), 3.0-
.28 (m, 2 H), 3.85 (s, 3 H), 7.23-7.41 (m, 2 H), 7.50-7.60 (m,
1
H NMR(CDCl
H), 2.31-2.43 (m, 1 H), 2.61 (d, J ) 4.2, 1 H), 3.36 (qAB, J
4.1 Hz, J
) 25.7 Hz, 2 H), 4.01 (d, J ) 44.9 Hz, 1 H); 13
NMR (CDCl
3
) δ 1.07 (s, 3 H), 1.46 (s, 3 H), 1.70-2.13 (m, 3
-1 1
1
3
1
3
1
695 (CdO) cm ; H NMR (CDCl
3
1
)
1
2
C
13
H), 8.05-8.11 (m, 1 H); C NMR (CDCl ) δ 24.9, 31.6, and
3
3
9
) δ 22.3, 23.2, 25.5, 31.9, 47.9, 48.0, 50.0, 61.8,
2.0 (d, J ) 22.2), 53.0, 91.7, and 94.8 (d, J ) 194.3 Hz), 127.3,
1
8
3.7, 91.6; F NMR (CDCl
3
) δ -53.9 (d, J ) 48.4 Hz). Anal.
28.5, 128.8, 130.4, 134.6, 142.1, 167.6 and 168.0 (d, J ) 25.8
Calcd for C10
H, 4.65.
H
14Cl
2
FNO
2
S: C, 39.75; H, 4.67. Found: C, 39.63;
19
Hz), 188.3 and 188.6 (d, J ) 18.1 Hz); F NMR (CDCl
3
) δ -156
(
m). Anal. Calcd for C12
C, 64.41; H, 4.78.
(+)-2-Ca r b om et h oxy-5,8-d im et h oxy-2-flu or o-1-t et r a l-
3
H11FO : C, 64.86; H, 4.95. Found:
(46) For examples of metal chelation involving sulfonyl oxygens
2
0
see: Trost, B. M.; Schmuff, N. R. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 396.
Hellwinkel, D.; Lenz, R.; Lammerzahl, F. Tetrahedron 1983, 39, 2073.
Giblin, G. M. P.; Simpkins, N. S. J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1987,
on e (9c): (95%), oil; 46% ee [R]
+4.93 (c 1.4, CHCl
); IR
D
3
-1
1
(
2
3
NaCl) 1762 and 1686 (CdO) cm ; H NMR (CDCl ) δ 2.48-
3
.78 (m, 2 H), 3.00-3.09 (t, J ) 6.0 Hz, 2 H), 3.70 (s, 3 H),
.81 (s, 3 H), 3.87 (s, 3 H), 6.79-6.87 (d, J ) 9.06 Hz, 1 H);
2
07. Hollstein, W.; Harms, K.; Marsch, M.; Boche, G. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1987, 26, 1287.
47) For recent studies on the influence of HMPA on anion aggrega-
1
3
(
7.01-7.09 (d, J ) 9.06 Hz, 1 H); C NMR (CDCl ) δ 18.9, 22.9
3
tion see: Collum, D. B. Acc. Chem. Res. 1992, 25, 448. J ackman, L.
M.; Chen, X. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 403.
and 23.2 (d, J ) 18.3 Hz), 30.2 and 30.5 (d, J ) 19.0 Hz), 52.8,
(
48) Weismiller, M. C.; Towson, J . C.; Davis, F. A. Organic Syntheses;
Wiley: New York, 1993; Coll. Vol. VIII, p 110.
49) Purrington, S. T.; Woodard, D. J . J . Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 142.
(50) Differding, E.; Lang, R. W. Helv. Chim. Acta 1989, 72, 1248.
(51) Differding, E.; Ofner, H. Synlett 1991, 187.
(