2720
P. Kumar et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 16 (2005) 2717–2721
either by GC–MS or with a Finnigan LC–MS mass
spectrometer. Enantiomeric excess was measured using
either chiral HPLC or by comparison of specific
rotations.
unreacted cumene hydroperoxide and cumune alcohol,
which were fully characterized by NMR and GC–MS.
4.4. Synthesis of (S)-4-bromo-3-hydroxybutyric acid
ethyl ester 12
4.2. Synthesis of (S)-3-hydroxy-c-butyrolactone 4
To a cooled solution of hydroxy butyrolactone 4 (1.02 g,
10 mmol) was added with stirring 30–33% HBr (3 mL,
15 mmol) in glacial acetic acid. The reaction mixture
was warmed to room temp and then heated to 60 ꢁC
under nitrogen for 5 h. Absolute ethanol was added to
the reaction mixture and then left stirring at the same
temp for 5 h. The solvent was evaporated and the resi-
due taken in ethyl acetate, washed with 10% NaHCO3,
and then with water until the aq layer becomes neutral.
The organic layer was dried over sodium sulfate and the
solvent distilled. The residue was purified by silica gel
column chromatography using ethyl acetate and pet
In a two-necked 100 mL round bottom flask with a
thermo well and reflux condenser was added maltodex-
trin (1.0 g, 2.77 mmol) dissolved in 0.16 M NaOH solu-
tion (0.32 g in 50 mL water, 7.93 mmol, 2.86 equiv). The
reaction mixture was heated at 40 ꢁC for 2 h. The color
of the reaction mixture became yellowish to dark red.
To this solution was added slowly 80% cumene hydro-
peroxide (0.7 mL, 3.66 mmol, 1.32 equiv). The reaction
temperature was increased slowly to 70 ꢁC and heated
for another 10 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to
25 ꢁC, and then to 0 ꢁC temperature. The cooled reac-
tion mixture was acidified with concd H2SO4 to pH 1.
The acidified solution was concentrated to dryness at
55 ꢁC, in order to remove glycolic acid and water. To
the yellow colored syrup formed, was added 10 g of
ice and then the mixture neutralized with solid sodium
bicarbonate, extracted with ethyl acetate, and dried over
sodium sulfate. The solvent was removed under reduced
pressure. The residue obtained was purified by silica gel
column chromatography using EtOAc/pet ether (4:6) as
eluent to give 4 (0.16 g) as a colorless oil in 56% yield,
ether (2:8) as eluent to give 12 (1.91 g) as a colorless
25
oil in 85% yield. ½aꢀD ¼ ꢁ10 (c 1.2, EtOH), lit.12
20
½aꢀD ¼ ꢁ11 (c 1, EtOH).
1
The physical and spectroscopic data (IR, H NMR) are
in accordance with those described in the literature.13
4.5. Synthesis of (R)-4-cyano-3-hydroxybutyric acid
ethyl ester 13
25
25
½aꢀD ¼ ꢁ84.6 (c 3.1, EtOH), lit.11 ½aꢀD ¼ ꢁ86.1 (c 3.1,
EtOH). The spectroscopic data (IR, 1H NMR) are
in accordance with those described in the literature.11
To a cooled solution of (S)-4-bromo-3-hydroxybutyric
acid ethyl ester 12 (1.13 g, 5 mmol) dissolved in 5 mL
of dry DMF was added with stirring NaCN (0.98 g,
20 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room
temperature overnight. DMF was evaporated under
reduced pressure, the residue left was extracted with
4.3. Modified work-up procedure for the recovery of
cumene alcohol
diethyl ether. The solvent was evaporated to afford 13
25
4.3.1. Synthesis of (S)-3-hydroxy-c-butyrolactone 4. In
a 500 mL two-necked round-bottom flask, was placed
maltodextrin (5 g) dissolved in 0.16 M NaOH solution
(1.6 g in 250 mL water). The reaction mixture was
heated at 40 ꢁC for 2 h. To the reaction mixture was
added 80% cumene hydroperoxide (3.5 mL, 1.32 equiv).
After addition, the reaction temperature was increased
to 70 ꢁC and heated for 10 h. After the reaction was
over, it was brought back to room temperature and
the reaction mixture extracted with ether (2 · 50 mL).
The organic layer was separated and the aqueous layer
cooled to 0 ꢁC. The pH of the solution was 8.16, and
the aqueous layer acidified with concd H2SO4 (2.8 mL)
to pH 1. The solution was concentrated to dryness at
60 ꢁC and to the residue crushed ice was added and neu-
tralized with sodium bicarbonate and then extracted
with ethyl acetate (3 · 200 mL). The organic layer was
washed with water and brine and dried over Na2SO4.
The evaporation of the solvent and purification by silica
gel column chromatography using pet ether/ethyl ace-
tate (4:6) gave 4 (0.8 g) as a colorless oil in 56% yield.
(0.43 g) as a light yellow liquid in 50% yield. ½aꢀD
¼
ꢁ32.5 (c 1, CHCl3), lit.2 [a]D = ꢁ33.1 (c 1.2, CHCl3).
1
The physical and spectroscopic data (IR, H NMR) are
in accord with those described in the literature.13
Acknowledgements
Financial support to this work under NMITLI pro-
gramme (Grant No. 5/258/2/2000-NMITLI) is grate-
fully acknowledged. This is NCL Communication No.
6684.
References
1. Larcheveˆque, M.; Henrot, S. Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 4277–
4282.
2. Brower, P. L.; Butler, D. E.; Deering, C. F.; Le, T. V.;
Millar, A.; Nanninga, T. N.; Roth, B. D. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1992, 33, 2279–2282.
3. Kim, E. E.; Baker, C. T.; Dwyer, M. D.; Murcko, M. A.;
Rao, B. G.; Tung, R. D.; Navia, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1995, 117, 1181–1182.
4. (a) Uchikawa, O.; Okukado, N.; Sakata, T.; Arase, K.;
Terada, K. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1988, 61, 2025–2029;
(b) Fuxe , K. USP 4,138,484.
4.3.2. Recovery of cumene alcohol. As mentioned in the
modified work-up procedure, the reaction mixture was
first extracted with diethyl ether (50 mL · 2). The organ-
ic layer was separated and concentrated. The residue
obtained was purified by column chromatography. The
yield (3.22 g) of the organic layer extract comprises of
5. (a) Papageorgiou, C.; Benezra, C. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50,
1144–1145; (b) Hanessian, S.; Vanasse, B. Can. J. Chem.