2
872 Communications to the Editor
Macromolecules, Vol. 35, No. 8, 2002
Sch em e 2. Syn th esis of Mod el Com p ou n d s 3 a n d 4
of 1a and 2a show a sharp, less intense absorbance at
-
1
2
158 cm due to Si-H end groups and a band at 2113
1
-
cm due to C-C triple-bond end groups.
Preliminary studies in our group show that oligomer-
ization of 1 using Wilkinson’s catalyst, Rh(PPh3)3Cl,
gives a variation of 1a that fluoresces at 400 nm,
consistent with a greater degree of conjugation in the
oligomer backbone. Currently, we are working to ana-
lyze the microstructure of 1a to attempt to understand
why Rh catalysis produces a longer wavelength emitter
than Pt catalysis.
Oligomers 1a and 2a are unique in that they contain
both conjugated and cross-conjugated segments, as a
consequence of R- and â-addition. A Pt-catalyzed hy-
drosilylation reaction between (phenylethynyl)trimeth-
ylsilane and dimethylphenylsilane was carried out to
produce monomeric models for the R- and â-addition
processes which occur in the Pt-catalyzed oligomeriza-
Ack n ow led gm en t. This work was supported by the
State System of Higher Education Faculty Professional
Development Council and by a Bloomsburg University
faculty research award. We thank Dr. Mark Tapsak and
Mr. Gregory Long for assistance with this project.
1
13
tions (Scheme 2). Analysis of the reaction by H and
C
NMR, IR, and GC/MS and comparison with the litera-
ture17 revealed 1-phenyldimethylsilyl-2-(trimethylsilyl)-
phenylethene (3) as the major product (83%). Evidence
for another product, 2-phenyldimethylsilyl-2-(trimeth-
ylsilyl)phenylethene (4) (14%), comes from the presence
of additional signals in the aromatic and methyl regions
Su p p or tin g In for m a tion Ava ila ble: Materials, instru-
mentation, and procedures for preparation and spectral data
for 1, 2, 1a , 2a , and 3. This material is available free of charge
via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
Refer en ces a n d Notes
1
3
of the C NMR spectrum and from GC/MS. In ac-
cordance with the model reaction, Scheme 1 illustrates
the two types of repeat units, m and n, within the
oligomers. The m-type repeat units are a result of
hydrosilylation occurring by â-addition and represent
the majority of the units, whereas the n-type repeat
units are cross-conjugated units formed by R-addition.
Since overlapping vinylic hydrogen resonances in the
m- and n-type units of the oligomers prohibit their
(
(
(
1) Skotheim, T. A., Ed. Handbook of Conducting Polymers;
Marcel Dekker: New York, 1986.
2) Hide, F.; Schwartz, M. A.; Anderson, M. R.; Pei, Q.; Heeger,
A. J . Science 1996, 273, 1833.
3) Burroughs, J . H.; Bradley, D. D. C.; Brown, A. R.; Marks,
R. N.; Mackay, K.; Friend, R. H.; Burn, P. L.; Holmes, A. B.
Nature (London) 1990, 347, 539.
(4) Kraft, A.; Grimsdale, A. C.; Holmes, A. B. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 402.
(5) H o¨ ger, S.; McNamara, J . J .; Schricker, S.; Wudl, F. Chem.
Mater. 1994, 6, 171.
1
distinction by H NMR, further studies are necessary
(6) Hwang, D. H.; Shim, H. K.; Lee, J . I.; Lee, K. S. J . Chem.
to confirm that the ratios of m- to n-type units in the
oligomers parallel the results of the model reaction.
The fluorescence spectrum obtained for 3 differs
significantly from that of the oligomers. When irradiated
at 240 nm, 3 fluoresces weakly at 297 nm. When
irradiated at 240 nm, 1a fluoresces with maxima at 358
and 377 nm (Figure 1). When irradiated at 240 nm, 2a
fluoresces with a maximum at 355 nm (Figure 2). The
longer wavelength fluorescence of 1a and 2a with
respect to model compound 3 suggests that the fluores-
cence of the oligomers is not due to isolated styrene-
type chromophores. The difference in emission wave-
length may be due to the occurrence of conjugation
through the silicon atoms in the oligomer backbones or
to interchain aggregation of oligomer chains. Kim and
Shim have prepared poly(phenylenevinylenesilylene)s
having slightly greater molecular weights than 1a and
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994, 2461.
(7) Hwang, D. H.; Kang, I. N.; J ang, M. S.; Shim, H. K.; Zyung,
T. Polym. Bull. (Berlin) 1996, 36, 383.
(
8) Kim, H. K.; Ryu, M. K.; Lee, S. M. Macromolecules 1997,
0, 1236.
3
(
9) Corriu, R. J . P.; Guerin, C.; Henner, B.; Kuhlmann, T.; J ean,
A.; Garniner, F.; Yassar J . Chem. Mater. 1990, 2, 351.
(10) Mao, S. S. H.; Tilley, T. D. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117,
365.
5
(
11) (a) Ryu, M. K.; Lee, J . H.; Lee, S. M.; Zyung, T.; Kim, H. K.
Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1996, 75 (2), 408. (b) Herrema, J .
K.; Hutten, P. F. J .; Gill, R. E.; Wilderman, J .; Wieringa, R.
H.; Hadziioannou, G. Macromolecules 1995, 28, 8102. (c)
Kim, H. K.; Ryu, M. K.; Kim, K. D.; Lee, S. M.; Cho, S. W.;
Park, J . W. Macromolecules 1998, 31, 1114. (d) J ung, S. H.;
Kim, H. K.; Kim, S. H.; Kim, Y. H.; J eoung, S. C.; Kim, D.
Macromolecules 2000, 33, 9277.
(12) Curry, J . W. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1956, 78, 1686.
(13) Karstedt, B. D. U.S. Patent 3,775,452, 1973.
(
14) Kim, D. S.; Shim, S. C. J . Polym. Sci., Part A.: Polym. Chem.
999, 37, 2933.
1
2
a that fluoresce from 370 to 420 nm.18 The compara-
(
15) Medvedeva, A. S.; Yazovtsev, I. A.; Demina, M. M.; Lyash-
enko, G. S.; Kozyreva, O. B.; Voronkov, M. G. Russ. J . Org.
Chem. 1969, 34, 1324.
16) (a) Ohshita, J .; Kanaya, D.; Watanabe, T.; Ishikawa, M. J .
Organomet. Chem. 1995, 489, 165. (b) Liu, H. Q.; Harrod,
J . F. Can. J . Chem. 1990, 68, 1100.
tively shorter emission wavelengths of 1a and 2a are
consistent with their shorter conjugated segments. We
are currently investigating the concentration depen-
dence of the emissions of the oligomer solutions to better
understand the photophysics of the oligomers.
(
(
17) Naka, A.; Okazaki, S.; Hayashi, M.; Ishikawa, M. J . Orga-
nomet. Chem. 1995, 499, 35.
The infrared spectra of 1 and 2 show an intense
-
1
(18) Kim, D. S.; Shim, S. C. J . Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem.
999, 37, 2263.
absorbance at 2161 cm due to the Si-H stretch. The
signal due to the C-C triple bond stretch is likely
masked by the broad Si-H absorbance. The IR spectra
1
MA011789G