E. Nakata et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 1663–1666
1665
of unprotected SNARF derivatives with higher inherent cell
permeability.
These considerations motivated us to derivatize existing SNARF
reagents by another strategy, that is, substitution of a hydrogen
atom of the benzene moiety with a halogen atom, such as fluorine
or chlorine, in order to increase hydrophobicity as well as to mod-
ulate photophysical properties. So far, there are only limited re-
2
,7
ports on the derivatization of benzo[c]xanthene fluorophores.
Herein, we report the synthesis and photophysical properties of
the newly synthesized SNARF-F and SNARF-Cl indicators.
SNARF-F was synthesized from commercially available tetraflu-
orophthalic anhydride as shown in Scheme 1a. Reaction of
3
-dimethylaminophenol with tetrafluorophthalic anhydride in
0
0
toluene produced 2-carboxy-3,4,5,6-fluoro-3 -dimethylamino-2 -
hydroxybenzophenone. Condensation of this product with
1
,6-dihydroxynaphthalene afforded the desired SNARF-F dye.
SNARF-Cl was synthesized from tetrachlorophthalic anhydride in
a manner similar to the preparation of SNARF-F (Scheme 1b).
1
Structures of all compounds were confirmed with H NMR, high-
MS, and elemental analysis (see Supplementary data).
a
The absorbance and fluorescence properties, pK , and calculated
log P (c log P) of the SNARF derivatives are summarized in Table 1.
In aqueous solution, SNARF produced maximal absorption and
strong fluorescence at 544 and 583 nm, respectively, at pH 5.0,
and 573 and 627 nm, respectively, at pH 10.0 (Fig. 2a). Notably,
as compared to SNARF, the absorption and fluorescence of
SNARF-F exhibited a typical red shift, that is, SNARF-F produced
maximal absorption and strong fluorescence at 571 and 603 nm
at pH 5.0, respectively, and maximal absorption strong fluores-
cence at 603 and 650 nm, respectively, at pH 10.0 (Fig. 2b). In
the case of SNARF-Cl, a similar red shift was observed (Fig. 2c).
The altered properties of absorption and fluorescence were clearly
confirmed under bright-field and transilluminator observations
Figure 4. Microscopic images of V79 cells fluorescently labeled with SNARF-F, Mito
Tracker Green FM and Hoechst 33258. Cells were imaged simultaneously for (a)
SNARF-F, (b) Mito Tracker Green FM and (c) Hoechst 33258. The overlay image of
(
a), (b) and (c) is shown in (d). (e) is the transmission image. The scale bars (20
lm)
are shown in the photograph.
(
Fig. 2d and e). As described above, it should be noted that a pH
indicator with longer wavelength emission is beneficial for intra-
cellular applications. The pK values of SNARF-F and SNARF-Cl
were determined to be 7.38 and 7.90, respectively (Figs. S1 and
S2). It has been pointed out that the relatively high pK value of
SNARF (pK = 7.62) is problematic for measuring the cytosolic pH
(Fig. 4 and S3). Along with SNARF, SNARF-F and SNARF-Cl were
localized mainly in the mitochondria and cytosol.
2
,6a
a
In conclusion, we designed and synthesized two new SNARF
derivatives, SNARF-F and SNARF-Cl. Their photophysical and char-
acteristic properties indicated both to be useful as dual-emission
pH indicators. SNARF-F, in particular, appears to be more promis-
ing for intracellular application as compared to traditional SNARF,
because SNARF-F combines the typical red shift of absorption and
a
a
2,4,7,8
of most cell lines (pH ꢀ 6.8–7.4).
In this regard, SNARF-F is
more suitable as a pH indicator for intracellular pH measurement.
The c log P values of SNARF, SNARF-F, and SNARF-Cl were calcu-
lated to be 4.99, 5.69, and 7.29, respectively. These findings indi-
fluorescence with
permeability.
a
lower pK
a
together with higher cell
9
cate that SNARF-F and SNARF-Cl are more hydrophobic than
SNARF, and thus, should be more cell permeable than SNARF. In or-
der to verify this, the cellular uptake of the two SNARF derivatives
was quantitatively evaluated by flow cytometry. As shown in Fig-
ure 3, we confirmed more effective cellular uptake of SNARF-F
and SNARF-Cl than of SNARF. Further, the localization of SNARF-F
and SNARF-Cl were confirmed by a multistaining procedure
Acknowledgments
This research was financially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for
Young Scientist (B) (no. 21710232) from the Ministry of Education,
Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan. The authors thank
Dr. Atsushi Tabata (Tokushima University) for his help with the
flow cytometry measurements, and Ms. Maki Nakamura, Ms. Emi-
ko Okayama and the staff at our Faculty for measurement of NMR,
and elemental analysis. We also thank Dr. Kenneth L. Kirk (NIH) for
his critical and valuable comments.
Supplementary data
References and notes
1.
(a) Willmann, J. K.; Bruggen, N. V.; Dinkelbuorg, L. M.; Gambhir, S. S. Nat. Rev.
Drug Disc. 2008, 7, 591; (b) Kobayashi, H.; Ogawa, M.; Alford, R.; Choyke, P. L.;
Urano, Y. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 2620.
Figure 3. Flow cytometry analysis of the cellular uptake of the fluorescence of
SNARF into V79 cells. The cells were incubated with SNARF-F (red), SNARF-Cl (blue)
or SNARF (green) or without SNARF derivatives (gray).
2. Han, J.; Burgess, K. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 2709.
3. Whitaker, J. E.; Haugland, R. P.; Prendergast, F. G. Anal. Biochem. 1991, 194, 330.