C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
to prepare B and C according to the Pd-adsorption procedure for
A. When A, B, or C was subjected to the Suzuki-Miyaura coupling
of iodobenzene and 4-chlorophenylboronic acid, the yields for runs
1 to 10 were excellent to quantitative in all cases (Table 1, entries
1-3). D, prepared from Au(mesh) with Pd(OAc)2 as a Pd source,
was also highly active for the Suzuki-Miyaura coupling (entry 4).
These results showed that the Pd materials A, B, C, and D are
highly recyclable.20
into reaction mixtures, removal of the residual Pd is unnecessary
using SAPd, even in syntheses involving pharmaceutical ingredients.
Acknowledgment. We are grateful to D. Nomoto, Dr. S. Ueda,
and Dr. K. Kobayashi (NIMS, SPring-8), Prof. S. Tsukamoto, Dr.
T. Konishi, K. Tateishi, and T. Tojo (Anan National College of
Technology) as well as Dr. K. Iizuka, M. Yokota, and Y. Furukawa
(Nippon Institute of Technology) for measuring SR-HXPS. This
research was partially supported by Grants-in-Aid from the Ministry
of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.
We next measured the amount of Pd adsorbed on the Pd materials
B-D with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-
MS) analysis. These analyses revealed that B, C, and D included
95, 80, and 38 µg of Pd, respectively.21 We subsequently measured
the amount of Pd released into the reaction mixtures of each
Suzuki-Miyaura coupling run by ICP-MS. Table 2 shows that the
amount of released Pd in each run was extremely low. The amount
of Pd in the reaction mixture using B-D is far lower than the U.S.
government-required value of <5 ppm residual metal in product
streams.22 In particular, in the case of D, the leached Pd into the
reaction mixture was only 76-38 ng for 1 mmol scale preparation
(12.7-6.3 ppb in 3 mL of solvent, 0.2-0.1% of Pd from D), the
average being 26 ng for 10 runs. The Crudden group reported an
excellent Pd material supported on mercaptopropyl-modified me-
soporous silica, which has been recognized as one of the best
catalytic Pd materials from the point of view of leaching: 720-30
ng for 1 mmol scale preparation (72-3 ppb in 2.5 mL of solvent,
0.006-0.13% of Pd from the Pd material), the average being 242
ng for 4 runs.23,24 The amount of the leached Pd in the reaction of
our Pd material D is similar or less, compared with that of
Crudden’s material. Furthermore, since Crudden’s material can only
be recycled 5 times, D would be considered highly recyclable,
making it one of the lowest releasing Pd materials with high
recyclability. Due to its extremely low Pd leaching levels, we
employed D, i.e., SAPd (Sulfur-modified Au supported Pd material)
for further studies.
We then investigated the scope and limitation of SAPd in the
Suzuki-Miyaura coupling using aryl iodides and arylboronic acids.
The corresponding products were obtained in excellent yields as
summarized in Table 3. It is noteworthy that isolated yields (%) of
3i between the first run to fourth run were 54, 46, 8, and 5
respectively, when the control experiment of entry 9 was carried
out using SAPd without Piranha treatment. These control experi-
ments indicate Piranha treatment is necessary and sulfur is needed
to create an active catalyst or retain Pd on the surface.
In summary, we have found in the SR-HXPS measurement of
Piranha-treated Au(111)/mica that the gold surface underwent sulfur
modification during this treatment, which was believed to have only
removed impurities from the gold surface. We also successfully
developed a practical Pd material, SAPd, whose Pd was im-
mobilized on sulfur-modified Au. With the lowest Pd-releasing
levels and high recyclability, this is one of the best Pd materials
thus far developed. Because it leaches extremely low levels of Pd
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
full characterizations of compounds. This material is available free of
References
(1) Review: Ulman, A. An Introduction to Ultrathin Organic Films: From
Langmuir-Blodgett to Self-Assembly; Academic Press: New York, 1991.
(2) Review: Ulman, A. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 1533–1554.
(3) Review: Flink, S.; van Veggel, F. C. J. M.; Reinhoudt, D. N. AdV. Mater.
2000, 12, 1315–1328.
(4) Review: Gooding, J. J.; Mearns, F.; Yang, W.; Liu, J. Electroanalysis 2003,
15, 81–96.
(5) Review: Love, J. C.; Estroff, L. A.; Krebel, J. K.; Nuzzo, R. G.; Whitesides,
G. M. Chem. ReV. 2005, 105, 1103–1169.
(6) Nishida, N.; Hara, M.; Sasabe, H.; Knoll, W. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1996, 35,
5866–5872.
(7) Gro¨nbeck, H.; Curioni, A.; Andreoni, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122,
3839–3842.
(8) Voicu, R.; Ellis, T. H.; Ju, H.; Leech, D. Langmur 1999, 15, 8170–8177.
(9) Chen, I.-W. P.; Chen, C.-C.; Lin, S.-Y.; Chen, C.-H. J. Phys. Chem. B
2004, 108, 17497–17504.
(10) Petrovykh, D. Y.; Suda, H. K.; Opdahl, A.; Richter, L. J.; Tarlov, M. J.;
Whitman, L. J. Langmur 2006, 22, 2578–2587.
(11) Pisarek, M.; Lewandowska, M.; Roguska, A.; Kurzydlowski, K. J.; Janik-
Czachor, M. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2007, 104, 93–97.
(12) Seu, K. J.; Pandey, A. P.; Haque, F.; Proctor, E. A.; Ribbe, A. E.; Hovis,
J. S. Biophys. J. 2007, 92, 2445–2450.
(13) Phan, N. T. S.; Van Der Sluys, M.; Jones, C. W. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2006,
348, 609–679.
(14) Yin, L.; Liebscher, J. Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 133–173.
(15) For example: Hoshiya, N.; Isomura, N.; Shimoda, M.; Yoshikawa, H.;
Yamashita, Y.; Iizuka, K.; Tsukamoto, S.; Shuto, S.; Arisawa, M.
ChemCatChem 2009, 1, 279–285.
(16) This does not mean a sulfur atom is embedded at an ∼20 nm depth, and
it is unclear whether the sulfur atoms are embedded at the interface between
gold and Pd adlayers or not.
(17) Proposal No. 2007B4600 and No. 2008A4605. For the measurements, the
incident X-ray energy was 5.95 KeV and a total energy resolution of 240
meV was employed.
(18) It should be noted that the sulfur for sample A remained in almost the
same chemical state before (Figure 1, Green line) and after (Figure 1, Blue
line) the Suzuki-Miyaura coupling. Pd-XPS was shown in Figure 2.
(19) We did not use Pd 3d peaks but Pd 2p peaks, since the peaks of Pd 3d5/2
or 3d3/2 overlap with that of Au 4d5/2 of substrates in the energy region.
(20) D could be recycled at least 20 times.
(21) Au(foil) in B is 13 × 11 × 0.127 mm3 (325 mg). Au(mesh) in C and D is
12 × 12 mm3 (100 mesh, 99 mg). D included 14 ( 9 µg of S (n ) 4).
(22) Flahive, E. J.; Ewanicki, B. L.; Sach, N. W.; O’Neill-Slawecki, S. A.;
Stankovic, N. S.; Yu, S.; Guinness, S. M.; Dunn, J. Org. Process Res.
DeV. 2008, 12, 637–645.
(23) Crudden, C. M.; Sateesh, M.; Lewis, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
10045–10050.
(24) Webb, J. D.; MacQuarrie, S.; McLeney, K.; Crudden, C. M. J. Catal. 2007,
252, 97–109.
JA9100084
9
7272 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 21, 2010