by treating it with Pd(Ph3P)4 in the presence of an excess of
dimedone.11 The resulting secondary amine 15 (99%) was
then subjected to chlorination, at nitrogen, using N-chloro-
succinimide (NCS), and the N-chloroamine 16 so formed
(88%) was treated with tri-n-butylstannane (n-Bu3SnH, 1.1
mol equiv) and AIBN (5 mol %) in benzene at reflux. This
resulted in the coproduction of the chromatographically
separable reductive cyclization product 17 (23% or 77%
based on recovered 15) and the direct reduction product 15
(71% recovery).
The initial assignment of stereochemistry to the two new
stereogenic centers, C11b and C11c, established within
product 17 during the radical cyclization process was based
on mechanistic arguments. Thus, in keeping with outcomes
observed in analogous cyclization reactions involving carbon-
centered radicals,12 the formation of a cis-ring-fused system
would be expected. Furthermore, the benzylic radical created
as a result of the cyclization process would be expected to
react with n-Bu3SnH at the sterically less congested ꢀ-face,
thereby establishing the illustrated R-orientation of the aryl
group at C11b in compound 17.
Figure 2. ORTEP derived from the single-crystal X-ray analysis
of compound ent-1. Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at the 50%
probability level. H atoms are shown as spheres of arbitrary radius.
A comparison of the 1H and 13C NMR spectral data derived
from lactone ent-1 with those reported1 for nobilisitine A is
presented in Table 1. This quite clearly reveals that the two
compounds are different and, therefore, that the structure
assigned to the title natural product is incorrect. The large
difference in the chemical shifts of the resonances due to
the methyl group protons (δH 1.45 for ent-1 vs δH 2.24 for
nobilisitine A) is particularly notable. The high-field nature
of the former chemical shift can be attributed to the shielding
of the N-methyl group in lactone ent-1 by the adjacent cis-
related arene unit. It is tempting, therefore, to assume that
in the natural product a trans-relationship exists between the
The conversion of product 17 into target ent-1 was
effected, in 93% yield, by treating the former compound with
acidified DOWEX-50WX8-100 ion-exchange resin in water/
methanol. All of the spectral data derived from lactone ent-1
were in complete accord with the assigned structure, and
final confirmation of the relative stereochemistry followed
from a single-crystal X-ray analysis.13 The ORTEP arising
from this analysis is shown in Figure 2, while further details
are presented in the Supporting Information, including the
full assignment of the 1H and 13C NMR spectral data recorded
for the compound.
1
Table 1. Comparison of the 13C and H NMR Data Recorded for Synthetically-Derived Lactone ent-1 with those Reported for
Nobilisitine A
13C NMR (δC)
1H NMR (δH)
lactone ent-1a
nobilisitine Ab
lactone ent-1c
nobilisitine Ad
164.7
151.9
147.6
137.8
121.0
109.8
106.6
101.9
78.0
69.7
67.7
55.0
45.2
164.0
152.6
147.2
137.3
118.6
109.7
106.5
102.0
81.4
68.6
66.6
54.9
41.8
7.54, s, 1H
6.70, s, 1H
6.05, m, 2H
7.53, s, 1H
7.05, s, 1H
6.05, broad s, 2H
4.65, dd, J ) 6.6 and 5.0 Hz, 1H
3.96, ddd, J ) 9.9, 6.6, and 5.0 Hz, 1H
3.34, dd, J ) 5.0 and 5.0 Hz, 1H
3.24, ddd, J ) 13.6, 6.6, and 5.0 Hz, 1H
2.67, dd, J ) 5.8 and 5.0 Hz, 1H
2.30, m, 1H
2.24, s, 3H
2.27, m, 1H
2.02, m, 1H
2.00, m, 1H
1.62, m, 2H
-
4.61, app. t, J ) 2.5 Hz, 1H
3.74, ddd, J ) 11.7, 3.7, and 2.9 Hz, 1H
3.31, td, J ) 10.6 and 6.8 Hz, 1H
2.87, dd, J ) 4.6 and 3.0 Hz, 1H
2.60, app. t, J ) 4.9 Hz, 1H
2.37-2.33, complex m, 1H
2.26-2.22, complex m, 1H
1.95-1.90, complex m, 1H
1.88, app. q, J ) 12.4 Hz, 1H
1.78, dt, J ) 10.3 and 4.9 Hz, 1H
1.47-1.44, complex m, 1H
1.45, s, 3H
41.0
39.4
36.6
34.7
30.9
29.8
33.7
30.1
signal due to OH proton not observed
-
signal due to OH proton not observed
-
a Data recorded in CDCl3 at 200 MHz. b Data obtained from ref 1 and recorded in CDCl3 at unspecified field strength. c Data recorded in CDCl3 at 800
MHz. d Data obtained from ref 1 and recorded in CDCl3 at unspecified field strength.
5212
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 22, 2010