1226
MASHKINA
specific surface area, grain size, and structural sodium (Na
incorporated into the γ-Al2O3 lattice) impurity content.
Therefore, we examined a series of alumina catalysts
with different parameters. Table 2 summarizes the results
obtained.
estimated from the ratio of the observed reaction rate to
the rate achieved under presumption of the accessibility
of the entire inner surface of the catalyst for the reactants
and products [12].
We carried out experiments with γ-Al2O3 samples
characterized by various crushing degrees and found
that the reaction rate is unaffected by a decrease in the
grain size beyond 0.25–0.5 mm. Therefore, the degree
of the surface utilization was estimated from the ratio
of the reaction rates on the whole grains and grains
with a size of 0.25–0.5 mm. We found that surface
is utilized nearly exhaustively at the transport pore
volume of 0.34 cm3 g–1, below which level the degree
of the surface utilization does not exceed 0.7–0.8.
The process parameters were examined in relation to the
reaction conditions in the presence of γ-Al2O3 with Ssp =
330 m2 g–1, Na content 0.03 wt%, and dgrain = 0.25–0.5 mm
in the kinetic region. The experiments were carried out
at atmospheric pressure, temperature 250–480°C, initial
furan concentration 1–20 vol%, Н2S concentration
9–60 vol%, M = 2.8–20, and different contact times.
Table 3 and Fig. 2 present the results obtained.
It is seen that, with decreasing grain size, the activ-
ity of alumina tends to increase. With the transport pore
volume and structural sodium impurity content being
identical, the reaction rate tends to increase proportion-
ally to increase in the specific surface area of the catalyst.
The catalyst comprised of γ-Al2O3 and χ-Al2O3 exhibits
a lower activity; the catalyst based on (γ + χ + η)-Al2O3,
which moreover has a small volume of transport pores,
is even less active.
Heterogeneous catalytic processes are typically
complicated by diffusion phenomena [12]. It was shown
experimentally that the observed rate of thiophene forma-
tion from furan and hydrogen sulfide is independent of the
gas velocities no lower than 0.8 l h–1. Also, the reaction
is substantially accelerated with increasing temperature.
Apparently, there is no significant external diffusion
inhibition. The specific surface area and pore structure
of the catalyst affect the reaction rate, which fact may be
indicative of internal diffusion complications. The degree
of utilization of the surface of whole catalyst grains is
It is seen that, when the temperature and initial
concentrations of the reactants are constant, the degree
of furan conversion and thiophene yield tend to increase
with increasing contact time; the selectivity of thiophene
formation is 97–100%. When the contact time and Н2S/
furan molar ratio remain constant, the degree of furan
conversion and thiophene yield are virtually unaffected
by an increase in the initial furan concentration. At
a constant Н2S concentration the reaction rate tends to
increase in direct proportion to the running concentration
of furan, and at a constant furan concentration it also
increases in direct proportion to increase in the running
concentration of Н2S. The reaction is described by a first-
order equation with respect to both furan and hydrogen
sulfide. When the temperature and initial concentration
of furan are kept constant, an increase in M from 1 to
16 causes the thiophene formation rate to increase by
nearly an order of magnitude. For example, at 400°C and
furan concentration of 2 vol% we obtained the following
results:
log c2
log w2
log w1
H2S/ furan
1.0 3.1 4.5 6.2 8.5 11.2 16.0
log c1 + 1
w, mmol h–1 g–1 0.4 1.0 1.4 1.6 2.0 2.7 3.6
Fig. 2. (1) Furan conversion rate w1 vs. running furan concen-
tration c1 at the initial Н2S concentration of 10–11 vol% and
(2) hydrogen sulfide conversion rate w2 vs. running H2S con-
centration c2 at the initial furan concentration of 12–13 vol%.
An increase in temperature leads not only to accel-
eration of the thiophene formation but also to a certain
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED CHEMISTRY Vol. 84 No. 7 2011