Article
Cheng et al.
dropwise at room temperature. After addition, it was stirred for
borate buffer with a concentration of 1% wt. The
mixture was sonicated in an ultrasonic bath with shak-
ing at 40-50 °C for 5-10 min. Upon cooling to room
temperature, gelation was observed by the inverted vial
method.
4
8 h and the solvent was concentrated to dryness in vacuo. The
crude product was dissolved in 200 mL of EtOAc, washed with
0% aq citric acid and water, and then dried (MgSO ). It was
1
4
filtered, and the filtrate was concentrated to dryness in vacuo to
give a white powder 4.44 g (76%). HNMR (250 MHz, DMSO-
1
-3
B. Each Fmoc-tripeptide (6.2 mg, 9.1ꢀ 10 mmol) was
d6) δ (ppm): 8.13 (d, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.90 (d, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.74
first dispersed in 1.5 mL of water by sonication for
5 min, followed by careful addition of aq NaOH (1 M)
to dissolve the Fmoc-tripeptide via vortexing so that a
clear solution was obtained. To the basic peptide solu-
(
3
m, 3H), 7.44 (m, 2H), 7.32 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 4.33-4.12 (m, 4H),
.91(m, 1H), 2.02 (m, 1H), 1.68-1.40 (m, 3H), 0.88 (m, 12H). MS:
þ
þ
calcd [M ] = 452, obsvd [Mþ1 ] =453.
Synthesis of Fmoc- -Val- -Leu-
-Val- -Leu (4.00 g, 8.84 mmol) and N-hydroxysuccinimide
1.02 g, 8.84 mmol) were dissolved in 40 mL of anhydrous
1
1
tion was added 15 mg of GdL sonicated for 5 min at
room temperature and then vortex mixed. Homoge-
neous hydrogels were formed in 15 min.
L
L
L-Lys(Boc). Fmoc-
L
L
(
dimethoxyethane. The solution was cooled in ice-water, and a
solution of DCC (2.00 g, 9.72 mmol) in 10 mL of anhydrous
dimethoxyethane was added dropwise to the solution which
became cloudy white. The mixture was stirred for 24 h at room
temperature. The urea precipitate was filtered out, and the filtrate
was concentrated to dryness by evaporation of the solvent. The
resulting product was redissolved in a minimal amount of acetone
and then kept in a fridge for 4 h. The small amount of urea
precipitate was filtered out, and the filtrate was concentrated to
Congo Red Staining and Birefringence Monitored by
Polarized Optical Microscopy. Fresh Congo Red solution
was made as follows: Sodium chloride was added in excess to an
80% ethanol solution, vortexed, and thenfiltered. CongoRedwas
added in excess to the saturated NaCl ethanol solution, and the
3
2
resulting solution was vortexed and filtered. Congo Red solu-
tion was pipetted onto a glass microscope slide, and then the
peptide gel was placed underneath the surface of the Congo Red
solution and stained for approximately 1 min. After the excess
Congo Red solution was removed by blotting, images of the
sample placed between crossed polarizers were obtained with an
Olympus CX-41 microscope.
dryness by evaporation of the solvent to give white powder Fmoc-L-
1
Val-
L
-Leu-OSu. H NMR (250 MHz, DMSO-d) δ (ppm): 8.65 (d,
J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.91 (d, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.74 (d, J=7.5 Hz, 2H),
7.51 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.42 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.32 (t, J =
7.5 Hz, 2H), 4.65 (m, 1H), 4.23 (m, 3H), 3.92 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 1H),
2.80 (s, 4H), 2.02 (m, 1H), 1.71 (m, 3H), 0.88 (m, 12H).
Circular Dichroism (CD). The CD spectra were recorded
using a Chirascan spectropolarimeter (Applied Photophysics,
U.K.). Solutions of Fmoc-tripeptide in borate buffer (pH = 10)
with a range of concentrations (0.1, 0.5, 1 wt.%) were loaded into
a 0.01 mm quartz cell (Hellma 0.01 mm quartz Suprasil). Spectra
were obtained from 200 to 280 nm with a 0.5 nm step and 2.5 s
collection time per step at 25 °C, taking four averages.
Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) and Raman Spectro-
scopy. Spectra were recorded using a Nexus-FTIR spectrometer
equipped with a DTGS detector and a multiple reflection atte-
nuated total reflectance (ATR) system. Solutions of Fmoc-tripep-
tide in borate buffer (pH = 10) with a concentration of 1 wt %
incubated for 16 h were sandwiched in ring spacers between two
To the solution of Fmoc-L-Val-L-Leu-OSu in 60 mL of DMF
was added dropwise a solution of N-(fluorenyl-9-methoxycarbo-
nyl) L-Lys(N -Boc) (2.18 g, 8.84 mmol) in 100 mL of cosolvent of
ε
THF/water (3:2) containing 2.3 mL of NMM at 0 °C. After
addition, the reaction mixture became clear, and it was stirred for
4
8 h. It was filtered, and the filtrate was concentrated by removing
THF in vacuo. The resulting mixture was diluted with 250 mL of
EtOAc, washed with 10% aq citric acid, and dried (MgSO ). It
4
was filtered and dried by evaporation of the solvent in vacuo. The
crude product was purified by column chromatography using
silica gel as the stationary phase with a gradient eluent system
(
DCM) = 0.45), followed by crystallization from EtOAc to give
f
from DCM to 10% MeOH in DCM, R (10% MeOH in
CaF plate windows (spacer 0.006 mm). A spectrum for each
2
sample was also measured for a film dried from a 1 wt % solution
1
a white powder (4.33 g, 72%). H NMR (250 MHz, DMSO-d
6
) δ
onto a CaF
range of 4000-950 cm
2
plate. All spectra were scanned 128 times over the
(
ppm): 8.05 (d, J=5.0 Hz, 1H), 7.91 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 3H), 7.73 (m,
-1
.
2
5
1
H), 7.42 (t, J=5.0 Hz, 2H), 7.32 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 6.79 (t, J=
.0 Hz, 1H), 4.30 (m, 5H), 3.87 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 2.86 (m, 2H),
.99 (m, 1H), 1.65-1.20 (m, 19H), 0.83 (m, 12H). MS: calcd
Raman Spectroscopy. Raman spectra were recorded using a
Renishaw inVia Raman microscope. The light source was a
multiline laser, such that the experiments were performed using
the λ=785 nm edge. Experiments were made on stalks prepared
by drying filaments of the peptide obtained from 2 wt % Fmoc-
VLK(Boc) and 2 wt % Fmoc-KLV(Boc) gels in borate buffer.
The stalks were focused byusing a 20ꢀ magnification lens. Spectra
þ
þ
[
M ]=680, obsvd [Mþ1 ]=681.
Fmoc- -Lys(Boc)- -Leu- -Val was synthesized starting form
N-(fluorenyl-9-methoxycarbonyl) -Lys (Boc) according to the
L
L
L
L
above method in the route shown in Scheme 1.
1
Fmoc-L-Lys(Boc)-OSu. H NMR (250 MHz, DMSO-d ) δ
-1
6
were obtained in the interval 100-3000 cm , using a 20 s
(
2
4
ppm): 8.11 (d, J= 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.91 (d, J= 5.0 Hz, 2H), 7.70 (m,
H), 7.42 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.33 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 6.79 (m, 1H),
.33 (m, 4H), 2.91 (m, 2H), 2.82 (s, 4H), 1.79 (m, 2H), 1.37 (m, 13H).
collection time with 10% laser power and taking two averages.
Cryogenic-Transmission Electron Microscopy (Cryo-
TEM). Experiments were performed at Unilever Research,
Colworth, Bedford, U.K. Sample preparation was carried out
using a CryoPlunge 3 unit (Gatan Instruments) employing a
double blot technique. The amount of 3 μL of sample in borate
buffer was pipetted onto a plasma etched (15 s) 400 mesh holey
carbon grid (Agar Scientific) held in the plunge chamber at
approximately 90% humidity. The samples were blotted, from
both sides, for 0.5, 0.8, or 1.0 s depending on sample viscosity.
The samples were then plunged into liquid ethane at a tem-
perature of -170 °C. The grids were blotted to remove excess
ethane and then transferred, under liquid nitrogen to the cryo-
TEM specimen holder (Gatan 626 cryo holder) at -170 °C.
Samples were examined using a Jeol 2100 transmission electron
microscope operated at 200 kV and imaged using a Gatan
Ultrascan 4000 camera, and images were captured using Digi-
talMicrograph software (Gatan).
1
Fmoc-L-Lys(Boc)-L-Leu. H NMR (250 MHz, DMSO-d
ppm): 8.06 (d, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.91 (d, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.74 (m,
H), 7.42 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.33 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 6.78
6
) δ
(
2
(
1
m, 1H), 4.24 (m, 4H), 3.99 (m, 1H), 2.89 (m, 2H), 1.66-1.20 (m,
þ
8H), 0.86 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 6H). MS: calcd [M ] = 581, obsvd
þ
[Mþ1 ]=582.
ε
Fmoc-L-Lys(N -Boc)-L-Leu-L-Val. Rf (10% MeOH in
1
DCM) = 0.57; H NMR (250 MHz, DMSO-d
6
) δ (ppm): 7.97
(
2
d, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.91(d, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.88(m, 1H), 7.78 (m,
H), 7.50-7.30 (m, 4H), 6.77 (m, 1H), 4.39-4.11 (m, 5H), 3.99
(
1
m, 1H), 2.89 (m, 2H), 2.02 (m, 1H), 1.70-1.20 (m, 19H), 0.86 (m,
þ
þ
2H). MS: calcd [M ] =680, obsvd [Mþ1 ]=681.
Hydrogel Formation
A. Standard pH-adjusting method: Each Fmoc-tripeptide
was added into a vial, followed by addition of 0.5 mL of
4
992 DOI: 10.1021/la903678e
Langmuir 2010, 26(7), 4990–4998