N.T.K. Thuy, et al.
Phytochemistry Letters 37 (2020) 90–94
Table 2
were obtained from DV2D1B on HPLC column eluting with ACN in H O
2
α-Glucosidase activity of compounds 1–6 at the concentration of
(35%, v/v). DV2F was chromatographed on a RP-18 column eluting
with acetone/water (1/1.8, v/v) to give three smaller fractions, DV2F1-
DV2F3. DV2F1 fraction was chromatographed on a RP-18 column
eluting with methanol/water (1/1, v/v) to give two smaller fractions,
DV2F1A- DV2F1B. The DV2F1A was purified on HPLC column eluting
with 20% acetonitrile to yield 1 (40.0 mg). Compounds 6 (7.3 mg) and
4
0 μM.
Compounds
α-glucosidase inhibition (%)
1
11.8 ± 0.5
16.9 ± 0.7
< 10
2
3
5
(151.0 mg) were obtained from DV2F1B chromatographed on HPLC
4
14.7 ± 0.3
51.3 ± 3.2
50.4 ± 3.1
59.8 ± 1.6
5
column eluting with ACN in H
2
O (24%).
6
Acarbosea
3
.3.1. Volubiloside D (1)
a
25
Acarbose was used as positive control at the concentration of
White amorphous powder; [ ] ― 14.1 (c 0.1, MeOH); C28
H
O ,
D
46
Cl] ,
8
―
―
4
0 μM.
HR ESI MS m/z: 545.2887 [M + Cl] (calcd for [C28
H
O
46
8
1
13
5
45.2887); H- (CD
3
OD, 500 MHz) and C-NMR (CD
3
OD, 125 MHz)
The known compounds were identified as dregeoside Da1 (4)
Yoshimura et al., 1985), volubiloside A (5) (Sahu et al., 2002), and
data, see Table 1.
(
drevoluoside N (6) (Zhang et al., 2013) by analysis of 1D and 2D NMR
spectra and by comparison with those reported in the literature.
All compounds were screened for the α-glucosidase inhibitory ac-
tivity at the concentration of 40 μM. Acarbose, an α-glucosidase in-
hbitor was used as a positive control. As shown in Table 2, compounds
3
.3.2. Volubiloside E (2)
2
5
White amorphous powder; [ ] ― 27.5 (c 0.1, MeOH); C42
H
70
16Na]
O
16
,
,
D
+
+
HR ESI MS m/z: 853.4561 [M + Na] (calcd for [C42
H
70
O
1
13
8
53.4556); H (CD
3
OD, 500 MHz) and C NMR (CD
3
OD, 125 MHz)
data, see Table 1.
5
and 6 showed the most significant α-glucosidase inhibitory activity
with inhibition of 51.3 ± 3.2% and 50.4 ± 3.1%, compared to those of
acarbose (59.8 ± 1.6%). This is the first report of α-glucosidase in-
hibitory activity of compounds from D. volubilis.
3.3.3. Volubiloside F (3)
2
5
White amorphous powder; [ ] ― 34.9 (c 0.1, MeOH); C42
H
68
15
O
15
]
,
,
D
+
+
HR ESI MS m/z: 813.4614 [M + H] (calcd for [C42
H
69
O
1
13
8
13.4631); H (CD
3
OD, 500 MHz) and C NMR (CD
3
OD, 125 MHz)
3
. Experimental
data, see Table 1.
3
.1. General
3.4. Acid hydrolysis
All NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker 500 MHz AVANCE III
HD NMR spectrometer. HR-ESI-MS spectra were obtained using
AGILENT Q-TOF system (Agilent HPLC 1290 infinity, Agilent Q-TOF
Each compound (1–3, 10.0 mg) was separately dissolved in 1.0 N
HCl (dioxane―H O, 1:1, v/v, 1.0 mL) and heated to 80 °C in a water
bath for 3 h. The acidic solution was neutralized with silver carbonate
and the solvent thoroughly driven out under N overnight. After ex-
traction with CHCl , the aqueous layer was concentrated to dryness
using N to give aqueous residue (A). The aqueous residue (A) was
separated by silica gel CC eluting with CH Cl –MeOH (10:1, v/v) and
then further fractionated by RP-18 CC using a stepwise gradient of
2
6
550 iFunnel, dual AJS ESI source). HPLC was carried out using an
AGILENT 1200 HPLC system (J’sphere ODS M-80 column, 150 mm
length × 20 mm ID with the flow rate of 3 mL/min, detector DAD).
Column chromatography (CC) was performed on silica-gel (Kieselgel
2
3
2
6
0, 230–400 mesh, Merck) or RP-18 resins (30–50 μm, Fuji Silysia
2
2
Chemical Ltd.). For thin layer chromatography (TLC), pre-coated silica-
gel 60 F254 (0.25 mm, Merck) and RP-18 F254S (0.25 mm, Merck) plates
were used.
MeOH–H
2
O (6:4, 7:3, and 8:2, v/v) to give the saccharides. The specific
25
rotation of these sugars was determined. The specific rotation ([ ] ) of
D
sugars was determined after dissolving in H O for 24 h and compared to
2
3
.2. Plant material
the literature (lit): D-cymarose: found +50.0 (c 0.4, H
2
O), lit +51.8
(
Warashina and Noro, 2000); 6-deoxy-3-O-methyl-D-allose: found +
The Dregea volubilis leaves were collected at Lang Son, Vietnam in
11.0 (c 0.4, H
2
O); lit + 10.0 (Abe et al., 1999). Based on the above
September 2017 and identified by Dr. Nguyen The Cuong, Institute of
Ecology and Biological Resources. A voucher specimen (NCCT-P75) was
deposited at the Institute of Marine Biochemistry, VAST.
evidence and experiments, sugar components were found in compound
1: D-cymarose; compounds 2 and 3: D-cymarose and 6-deoxy-3-O-me-
thyl-D-allose.
3.3. Extraction and isolation
3.5. α-Glucosidase inhibitory assay
The dried powder of D. volubilis leaves (5.0 kg) was sonicated three
The α-glucosidase (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) enzyme inhibition
times with hot methanol and then removed solvent to yield dark solid
extract (630 g). The extract was suspended in water and successively
partitioned with n-hexane, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate giving n-
hexane (DV1, 90 g), dichloromethane (DV2, 200 g), ethyl acetate ex-
tracts (DV3, 23 g) and residual water layer (DV4). The DV2 fraction was
chromatographed on a silica gel column eluting with n-hexane/acetone
assay was performed as the previously described method (Hanh et al.,
2
014). The sample solution (2.0 mL) dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide)
and 0.5 U/mL α-glucosidase (40 μL) were mixed in 0.1 M phosphate
buffer (pH 7.0, 120 μL). After 5 min pre-incubation, p-nitrophenyl-α-D-
−3
glucopyranoside solution (5.10
M, 40 μL) was added, and the solu-
tion was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. The absorbance of released 4-
nitrophenol was measured at 405 nm by using a microplate reader
(
100:0 → 0:100, v/v) to give six sub-fractions, DV2A-DV2F. DV2D was
chromatographed on a RP-18 column eluting with methanol/water (2/
(
Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA).
1
, v/v) to give six sub-fractions, DV2D1-DV2D6. DV2D1 was chroma-
tographed on a RP-18 column eluting with acetone/water (1.2/1, v/v)
to give two smaller fractions, DV2D1A-DV2D1B. DV2D1A was further
Declaration of Competing Interest
chromatographed on HPLC column eluting with ACN in H O (35%) to
2
yield compound 3 (40.6 mg). Compounds 2 (19.1 mg) and 4 (88.4 mg)
The authors declared no conflict of interest.
93