OGINO ET AL.
11
chiral stationary phase for the investigation of protein binding:
Detection of the allosteric interaction between warfarin and
gravity‐driven achiral chromatography: Mechanistic rationale and
implications. Chem Sci. 2015;6:1043‐1048.
benzodiazepine binding sites. J Pharm Sci. 1991;80:164‐166.
24. Soloshonok VA. Remarkable amplification of the self‐dispropor-
tionation of enantiomers on achiral‐phase chromatography
columns. Angew Chem. 2006;118:780‐783.
8. Kang XF, Cheley S, Guan X, Bayley H. Stochastic detection of
enantiomers. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:10684‐10685.
9. Boersma A, Baylay H. Continuous stochastic detection of amino
acid enantiomers with a protein nanopore. Angew Chem Int Ed.
2012;51:9606‐9609.
25. Ito T, Ando H, Suzuki T, et al. Identification of a primary target of
thalidomide teratogenicity. Science. 2010;327:1345‐1350.
26. Lopez‐Girona A, Mendy D, Ito T, et al. Cereblon is a direct
protein target for immunomodulatory and antiproliferative
activities of lenalidomide and pomalidomide. Leukemia.
2012;26:2326‐2335.
10. Blaschke G, Kraft HP, Fickentscher K, Kohler F.
Chromatographische racemattrennung von thalidomid und
teratogene wirkung der enantiomere. Arzneim ‐forsch. 1979;29:1640
11. Nishimura K, Hashimoto Y, Iwasaki S. (S)‐form of α‐methyl‐N(α)‐
phthalimidoglutarimide, but not its (R)‐form, enhanced phorbol
ester‐induced tumor necrosis factor‐α production by human leuke-
mia cell HL‐60: Implication of optical resolution of thalidomidal
effects. Chem Pharm Bull. 1994;42:1157‐1159.
27. Lu G, Middleton RE, Sun H, et al. The myeloma drug lenalidomide
promotes the cereblon‐dependent destruction of Ikaros proteins.
Science. 2014;343:305‐309.
28. Fischer ES, Böhm K, Lydeard JR, et al. Structure of the DDB1‐
CRBN E3 ubiquitin ligase in complex with thalidomide. Nature.
2014;512:49‐53.
12. Knoche B, Blaschke G. Investigations on the in vitro racemization
of thalidomide by high‐performance liquid chromatography.
J Chromatogr A. 1994;666:235‐240.
29. Chamberlain PP, Lopez‐Gilona A, Miller K, et al. Structure of the
human cereblon–DDB1–lenalidomide complex reveals basis for
responsiveness to thalidomide analogs. Nat Struct Mol Biol.
2014;21:803‐809.
13. Schumacher H, Smith RL, Williams RT. The metabolism of
thalidomide: The spontaneous hydrolysis of thalidomide in solution.
Br J Pharmacol. 1965;25:324‐337.
30. Takeuchi Y, Shiragami T, Kimura K, Suzuki E, Shibata N. (R)‐ and
(S)‐3‐fluorothalidomides: Isosteric analogues of thalidomide. Org.
Lett. 1999;1:1571‐1573.
14. Nakamura T, Nogichi T, Miyachi H, Hashimoto Y. Hydrolyzed
metabolites of thalidomide: Synthesis and TNF‐α production‐
inhibitory activity. Chem Pharm Bull. 2007;55:651‐654.
31. Yamamoto T, Suzuki Y, Ito E, Tokunaga E, Shibata N. Asymmetric
synthesis of both mirror images of 3'‐fluorothalidomide by
enantiodivergent fluorination using a single, cinchona alkaloid.
Org Lett. 2011;13:470‐473.
15. Stephens TD, Bunde CJW, Fillmode BJ. Mechanism of action
in
thalidomide
teratogenesis.
Biochem
Pharmacol.
2000;59:1489‐1499.
16. Ando Y, Price DK, Dahut WL, Cox MC, Reed E, Figg WD.
Pharmacogenetic associations of CYP2C19 genotype with in vivo
metabolisms and pharmacological effects of thalidomide. Cancer
Biol Ther. 2002;1:669‐673.
32. Lee CJ, Shibata N, Wiley MJ, Wells PG. Fluorothalidomide: A
characterization of maternal and developmental toxicity in rabbits
and mice. Toxicol Sci. 2011;122:157‐169.
33. Kumar S, Rajkumar V. Thalidomide and lenalidomide in the
17. Ando Y, Fuse E, Figg WD. Thalidomide metabolism by the CYP2C
treatment of multiple myeloma. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42:1612‐1622.
subfamily. Clin Camcer Res. 2002;8:1964‐1973.
34. Kumar G, Lau H, Laskin O. Lenalidomide: In vitro evaluation of the
metabolism and assessment of cytochrome P450 inhibition and
induction. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009;63:1171‐1175.
18. Lu J, Helsby N, Palmer BD, et al. Metabolism of thalidomide in
liver microsomes of mice, rabbits, and humans. J Pharm Exp Ther.
2004;310:571‐577.
35. Chen N, Wen L, Lau H, Surapaneni S, Kumar G. Pharmacokinetics,
metabolism and excretion of [14C]‐lenalidomide following oral
administration in healthy male subjects. Cancer Chemother
Pharmacol. 2012;69:789‐797.
19. Nakamura T, Nogichi T, Kobayashi H, Miyachi H, Hashimoto Y.
Mono‐ and dihydroxylated metabolites of thalidomide: Synthesis
and TNF‐α production‐inhibitory activity. Chem Pharm Bull.
2006;54:1709‐1714.
36. Hoffman M, Kasserra C, Reyes J, et al. Absorption, metabolism
and excretion of [14C] pomalidomide in humans following oral
administration. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013;71:489‐501.
20. Chowdhury G, Murayama N, Okada Y, et al. Human liver
microsomal cytochrome P450 3A enzymes involved in thalidomide
5‐hydroxylation and formation of a glutathione conjugate. Chem Res
Toxicol. 2010;23:1018‐1024.
37. Li Y, Zhou S, Hoffmann M, Kumar G, Palmisano M. Modeling and
simulation to probe the pharmacokinetic disposition of
pomalidomide R‐ and S‐enantiomers. J Pharmacol Exp Ther.
2014;350:256‐272.
21. Yamazaki H, Suemizu H, Igaya S, et al. In vivo formation of a
glutathione conjugate derived from thalidomide in humanized
uPA‐NOG mice. Chem Res Toxicol. 2011;24:287‐289.
38. Ogino Y, Asahi T. Model of complex chiral drug metabolic
systems and numerical simulation of the remaining chirality toward
analysis of dynamical pharmacological activity. J Theor Biol.
2015;373:117‐131.
22. Chowdhury G, Shibata N, Yamazaki H, Guengerich FP. Human
cytochrome P450 oxidation of 5‐hydroxythalidomide and
pomalidomide, an amino analogue of thalidomide. Chem Res
Toxicol. 2014;27:147‐156.
23. Maeno M, Tokunaga E, Yamamoto T, et al. Self‐disproportionation
39. Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, et al. Gaussian 09, Revision
D.01. Wallingford CT: Gaussian, Inc.; 2009.
of enantiomers of thalidomide and its fluorinated analogue via