1À4 being distinctive. In the BF2-containing products,
coupling of the imine proton to B is observed, leading to
the appearance of a broad quartet due to the 11B coupling
(3JHÀB = 3.7 Hz) (Figure S1). This coupling is absent in the
BPh2 analogues owing to the longer NÀB distance as ob-
served in the X-ray molecular structure (vide infra).
The X-ray molecular structures of 6 and 5 are shown in
Figures 2 and 3, respectively, with selected geometric
values. In both structures, the B has a slightly distorted
tetrahedral geometry with angles ranging from 106.43(15)°
and 115.31(16)° and from 104.6(11)° and 112.2(11)° in 6
Figure 1. Various chelating modes of B(III) complexes.
More exotic N,O-chelates forming six-membered rings
have been obtained from phenalene-1,3-dione and
perylenediimides.16 Also, dinuclear B-complexes have
been prepared with binaphthyl, salen, and para-phenyl
frameworks.17 Yet, the luminescence quantum yields for
such derivatives are typically low, and little information
about their photostability is available.
Here we disclose the facile preparation in two steps of
novel B(III) complexes of various substituted Anils, giving
Boranilcomplexes bearing substituentsengenderingstrong
luminescence in both solution and the solid state. Such
complexesoffer interesting prospects becauseoftheir facile
synthesis on a large scale from common precursors and
their possible use as synthons for connection of an addi-
tional chromophoric subunit or other module of interest.
Some of the complexes without donor/acceptor modules
have previously been prepared.12a,18
∧
and 5, respectively. Surprisingly, the N1 O1 fragment
appears quasi-planar in 6, with an rms deviation of 0.0110
˚
˚
A, while B1 lies only 0.0313(28) A out of the least-squares
mean plane defined by the nine atoms including N1 and O1.
This is unlike any of the 11 structures of diphenylboron
Schiff base derivatives found to date in the CSD,20 in which
all the chelate rings are markedly distorted from planarity.
Such distortions are seen in the difluoroboron derivative 5,
˚
where the B-atom is displaced 0.435(16) A from the hetero-
cycle mean plane. With the exception of the difluoroboron
chelate of N-methyl salicylaldimine,21 all six other struc-
tures of difluoroboron chelates found within the CSD also
show strong distortions of the chelate rings from planarity.
The B1ÀO1 and B1ÀN1 distances are significantly
longer in 6 than the corresponding distances in 5 (1.639(3)
˚
˚
vs 1.503(3) A and 1.552(15) vs 1.420(20) A, respectively),
presumably in reflection of the electronegativity of the
fluorine substituents. As a consequence of the congested
substitution at the B-center by two phenyl groups, the
methoxyphenyl substituent at the N1 atom is more tilted in
6 than in 5, as indicated by the respective dihedral angles
between the least-squares mean plane defined by the
heterobicycle and that of the phenyl ring, 63.46(9)° vs
48.70(60)°. The dihedral angles between the phenyl (C21/
C26 and C15/C20) B-substituents and the heterobicycle in
6 are 58.57(9)° and 76.21(10)°, respectively. The crystal
packing of both molecules is described in detail in the
Supporting Information (Figure S2 and S3).
Preparation of the Anil19 derivatives 1À4 is straightfor-
ward starting from the aldehydes A and anilines B in re-
fluxing ethanol with trace amounts of p-TsOH (Scheme 1).
During the course of the reaction the desired imines pre-
cipitate pure out of the reaction mixture.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of the Anils and their Boranil Complexes
(12) (a) Umland, F.; Hohaus, E.; Brodte, K. Chem. Ber. 1973, 106,
2427. (b) Hohaus, E. Monatsh. Chem. 1980, 111, 863.
(13) Son, H.-J.; Han, W.-S.; Wee, K.-R.; Chun, J.-Y.; Choi, K.-B.;
Han, S. J.; Kwon, S.-N.; Lee, C.; Kang, S. O. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2009,
1503.
(14) (a) Chen, J.; Burghart, A.; Wan, C.-W.; Thai, C; Ortiz, J.;
Reibenspies, J.; Burgess, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 2303.
(b) Muthukumaran, K.; Ptaszek, M.; Noll, B.; Scheidt, W. R.; Lindsey,
J. S. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 5354. (c) Bhaumik, J.; Yao, Z.; Borbas, E.;
Taniguchi, M.; Lindsey, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 8807.
(15) Zhang, Z.; Bi, H.; Zhang, Y.; Yao, D.; Gao, H.; Fan, Y.; Zhang,
H.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Ma, D. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 7230.
(16) (a) Zhou, Y.; Chi, S.; Qian, X. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 633. (b) Feng,
J.; Lia,g, B.; Wang, D.; Xue, D.; Li, X. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 4437.
(17) (a) Zhou, Y.; Kim, J. W.; Nandhakumar, R.; Kim, M. J.; Cho,
E.; Kim, Y. S.; Jang, Y. H.; Lee, C.; Han, S.; Kim, K. M.; Kim, J.-J.;
Yoon, Y. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 6512. (b) Wei, P.; Atwood, D. A.
Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36, 4060.
Subsequent B(III) complexation is feasible with BF3 Et2O
3
under basic conditions (diisopropylethylamine) to quench the
nascent HF or with BPh3 in hot toluene. No base is required in
this latter case, but the phenyl is used as the proton scavenger,
producing benzene. The reactions were readily monitored by
1H NMR spectroscopy, the loss of the signal near δ 13 ppm
due to the intramolecularly H-bonded phenolic proton of
(18) (a) Tripathi, S. M.; Tandon, J. P. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. Lett. 1978,
14, 97. (b) Okada, M.; Hatori, O. PCT WO2011/013474 A1.
(19) Hadjaudis, E. Mol. Eng. 1995, 5, 301.
(20) The CSD 3D Graphics Search System v5.32 (November 2010):
Allen, F. H. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B 2002, 58, 380.
(11) (a) Wu, Q.; Esteghamatian, M.; Hu, N.-X.; Popovic, Z.; Enright,
G.; Tao, Y.; D’Iorio, M.; Wang, S. Chem. Mater. 2000, 12, 79. (b) Qin,
Y.; Kiburu, I.; Shah, S.; Jakle, F. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5227.
(21) Lewinski, J.; Zachara, J.; Stolarzewicz, P.; Dranka, M.;
Kozodziejczyk, E.; Justyniak, I.; Lipkowski, J. New J. Chem. 2004, 28,
1320.
€
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 13, 2011
3415