Letters
J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 108, No. 42, 2004 16333
References and Notes
field-emission characteristics are probably attributed to the
geometry of the nanotubes.
(1) Jeong, S. H.; Hwang, H. Y.; Lee, K. H. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 78,
2052.
(2) Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, D.; Zhang, L.; Ma, H.; Yao, N.; Zhang,
B. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 2186.
(3) Wang, C.; Garicia, A.; Ingram, D. C.; Lake, M.; Kordesch, M. E.
Electron. Lett. 1991 27, 1459.
(4) Zhang, W. J.; Wu, Y.; Wong, W. K.; Meng, X. M.; Chan, C. Y.;
Bello, I.; Lifshitz, Y.; Lee, S. T. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 83, 3365.
(5) Kiyota, H.; Araki, H.; Kobayashi, H.; Shiga, T.; Kitaguchi, K.; Lida,
M.; Wang, H.; Miyo, T.; Takida, T.; Kurosu, T.; Lnoue, K.; Saito, I. Appl.
Phys. Lett. 1999, 75, 2331.
The variation of ln(J/E2) with 1/E presents a linear relation-
ship as shown in the inset of Figure 4, indicating that the field
emission from manganese oxide nanotubes follows the Fowler-
Nordheim (F-N) behavior. In this case, the electron emission
is proceeded by a field-emission process such as the tunneling
of electrons through a potential barrier. The relationship between
the current density J and the applied electric field E was
analyzed by using the simplified F-N equation for field
emission19-21
(6) Guo, J. X.; Sun, Z.; Tay, B. K.; Sun, X. W. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2003,
214, 351.
(7) Cheah, L. K.; Shi, X.; Liu, E.; Tay, B. K. J. Appl. Phys. 1999, 85,
6816.
(8) Jia, H.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, X.; Shu, J.; Luo, X.; Zhang, Z.; Yu, D.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 82, 4146.
(9) Dai, Z. R.; Pan, Z. W.; Wang, Z. L. AdV. Funct. Mater. 2003, 13, 9.
(10) Lee, C. J.; Lee, T. J.; Lyu, S. C.; Zhang, Y.; Ruh, H.; Lee, H. J.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 81, 3648.
(11) Han, W. Q.; Fan, S. S.; Li, Q. Q.; Hu, Y. D. Science 1997, 277,
1287.
(12) Konenkamp, R.; Boedecker, K.; Lux-Steiner, M. C.; Poschenrieder,
M.; Zenia, F.; Clement, C. L.; Wagner, S. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000, 77, 2575.
(13) Li, Y.; Meng, G. W.; Zhang, L. D.; Phillipp, F. Appl. Phys. Lett.
2000, 76, 2011.
(14) Kong, Y. C.; Yu, D. P.; Zhang, B.; Fang, W.; Feng, S. Q. Appl.
Phys. Lett. 2001, 78, 407.
(15) Pang, S. C.; Anderson, M. A.; Chapman, T. W. J. Electrochem.
Soc. 2000, 147, 444.
(16) Wu, M. S.; Chiang, P. C. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 2004, 7,
A122.
â2E2
φ
Bφ3/2
âE
J ) A
exp -
(
)
(
)
where J is the current density, E is the applied electric field, φ
is the work function, A and B are constant values of 1.56 ×
10-10 (A V-2 eV) and 6.83 × 103 (V eV-3/2 µm-1), respectively,
and â is the field-enhancement factor defined as the ratio of
the induced local electric field to the applied external field.
The curves in Figure 4 are independent of the cycle number.
Obviously, there is no destruction or composition change in the
nanotubes during the continuous measurements. It also can be
found in the XPS data (Figure 3) that the binding energies of
peaks are essentially the same before and after 15 cycles of
field-emission tests, indicating that the oxidation states of Mn
in these nanotubes have not changed upon cycling.
(17) Tench, D.; Warren, L. F. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1983, 130, 869.
(18) Pang, S. C.; Anderson, M. A. J. Mater. Res. 2000, 15, 2096.
(19) Fowler, R. H.; Nordheim, L. W. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 1928,
119, 173.
(20) Lee, C. J.; Lee, T. J.; Lyu, S. C.; Zhang, Y.; Ruh, H.; Lee, H. J.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 81, 3648.
(21) Frolov, V. D.; Karabutov, A. V.; Pimenov, S. M.; Konov, V. I.;
Ageev, V. P. Diamond Relat. Mater. 2001, 10, 1719.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the Ministry
of Economic Affairs of Taiwan under contract no. 93-EC-17-
A-08-R7-0312.