1
48
B. Donkova, D. Mehandjiev / Thermochimica Acta 421 (2004) 141–149
ment of their rounded “leaflets,” while the orthorhombic
MnC2O4·3H2O is in the shape of long, smooth needles. The
difference in the dispersities of the two crystallohydrates is
obviously due to their mechanisms of nucleation, the lat-
ter being homogeneous for MnC2O4·2H2O and heteroge-
neous for MnC2O4·3H2O (Donkova and Djarova, submit-
ted for publication). These facts could explained the dif-
ferent change of the surface area of the two products. An
optical microscopic comparison of the product obtained af-
ter dehydration of the initial dihydrate and trihydrate is
made in [4]. It shows that a powder is obtained in the
first case, while in the second case the shape of the ini-
tial crystals is preserved. The our scanning electron micro-
scopic observations established that the “leaflets” of the di-
hydrate breaking down during dehydration due to crack for-
mation caused by the water release. The situation with the
trihydrate is completely different. After dehydration, quite
straight grooves are observed on the surface of the initial
long smooth needles. Breakdown of these needles was not
established.
to manganese(III) but also to manganese(IV), which is
further pass to lower oxidation states. The oxidation pro-
cesses proceeds to a different extent depending on whether
the initial material is MnC2O4·2H2O or MnC2O4·3H2O.
This fact shows that the orthorhombic crystal lattice of
the trihydrate stabilizes the lower oxidation states of
manganese.
The annealing of the monoclinic ␣-MnC2O4·2H2O at
◦
450 C leads to its complete transformation into tetrago-
nal Mn3O4. At the same temperature, the orthorhombic
MnC2O4·3H2O gives not only Mn3O4, but also a large quan-
tity of cubic Mn2O3.
Both crystallohydrates are paramagnetic. The exchange
interaction between the manganese ions in MnC2O4·3H2O
is changing from antiferromagnetic to ferromagnetic dur-
ing the entire dehydration process, while in the case of
MnC2O4·2H2O the same interaction remains almost con-
stantly antiferromagnetic.
The enthalpy of dehydration of MnC2O4·3H2O is deter-
mined to be 132 kJ/mol, the respective values for the first,
second, and third molecule being 59, 45, and 16 kJ/mol.
Therefore, using monoclinic MnC2O4·2H2O as the start-
ing material, a considerably greater change in the surface
and structure is established, which leads to amorphization of
the sample, and which is not the case with the orthorhom-
bic MnC2O4·3H2O. This determines the differences in the
thermal and chemical stability of the obtained products and
affects the kinetics of the thermal decomposition. The more
developed surface possesses a greater reactivity, it is oxi-
dized faster and to a greater extent, which explains the lower
decomposition temperature of the product obtained from the
dihydrate and the stronger decrease of its magnetic moment.
According to literature data [7,13,29], in air atmosphere an
oxidation process to Mn(III) takes place just before decom-
position and calalyzes the later. After decomposition the
References
[1] M. Gorgeu, Compt. Rend. 47 (1858) 929.
[2] Otto Hauser, F. Wirth, J. Pract. Chem. 79 (2) (1909) 358.
[3] R. Deyrieux, C. Berro, A. Peneloux, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1 (1973)
25.
[4] A. Huizing, H.A.M. van Hal, W. Kwestroo, C. Lahgereis, P.C. van
Loosdregt, Mater. Res. Bull. 12 (1977) 605.
[5] K.B. Zaborenko, S.-C. Kung, L.L. Melikhov, V.A. Portyanoi, Ra-
diokhimiya 6 (6) (1964) 749.
[6] D. Dollimore, J. Dollimore, J. Little, J. Chem. Soc. (A) (1969) 2946.
[7] M.E. Brown, D. Dollimore, A.K. Galway, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday
Trans. 1 (70) (1974) 1316.
[8] A.K. Nohman, H.M. Ismail, G.A. Hussein, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis
m+
evolved CO reduces Mn
present Mn
to lower oxidation states and the
m+
n+
and Mn catalyzes the oxidation of CO to
34 (1995) 265.
CO2 [29]. In the present work was established that the oxi-
dation proceeds not only to Mn(III) but also to Mn(IV). For
the above reasons, all redox processes are much more inten-
sive when starting with MnC2O4·2H2O. Taking into account
the necessity of crystallization of the obtained in this case
amorphous phase, one can explain the more complex shape
of the respective DTA curve.
The corresponding interval for MnC2O4·3H2O is much
narrower, proving comparatively limited oxy-reduction pro-
cesses. In this case (1) the initial particles are considerable
bigger, (2) the anhydrous oxalate has a higher degree of crys-
tallization, and (3) the smaller change of the surface leads to
a more weakly oxidized product and respectively to a slower
decomposition process and a lower degree of reduction.
[9] M.I. Zaki, A.K. Nohman, Ch. Kappenstein, T.M. Wahdan, J. Mater.
Chem. 5 (7) (1995) 1081.
[10] A.K. Nikumbh, A.E. Athare, S.K. Pardeshi, Thermochim. Acta 326
(1999) 187.
[11] C. Duval, Inorganic Thermogravimetric Analysis, Elsevier, Amster-
dam, 1953.
[12] J. Robin, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. (1953) 1078.
[13] E.D. Macklein, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 30 (1968) 2689.
[14] Gy. Baksy, A.J. Hegedus, Thermochim. Acta 10 (1974) 399.
[15] M.U. Jacob, D.D. Perlmutter, Thermochim. Acta 49 (1981) 207.
[16] D. Dollimore, D. Griffiths, D. Nicholson, J. Chem. Soc. 166 (1963)
2617.
[
[
[
[
17] D. Dollimore, D. Nickolson, J. Chem. Soc. 165 (1962) 960.
18] D. Dollimore, Thermochim. Acta 117 (1987) 331.
19] D. Dollimore, J. Term. Anal. 11 (1977) 185.
20] F.E. Mabbs, D.J. Machin, Magnetism and Transition Metal Com-
plexes, Chapman and Hall, London, 1973, p. 153.
[21] D. Mehandjiev, S. Angelov, Magnetochemistry of Solid State, Nauka
I Izkustvo, Sofia, 1979, p. 116.
5
. Conclusions
[
22] R. Boca, Theoretical Foundations of Molecular Magnetism, Else-
vier, Amsterdam, Lousanne, New York, Oxford, Shannon, Singapore,
Tokyo, 1999, p. 504.
On the basis of the obtained magnetic data, it is proved
that the oxidation of the anhydrous product leads not only
[23] J.H. Van Vleck, J. Phys. 12 (1951) 262.