B.T. Raut et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 509 (2011) 9065–9070
9069
increase of the ZnO grain size. Chaparro et al. [26] ascribed this ‘red
shift’ in the energy gap, Eg, to an increase in crystallite size for the
annealed ZnSe films. Bao and Yao [27] also reported a decrease in
Eg with increasing annealing temperature for SrTiO3 thin films, and
suggested that a shift of the energy gap was mainly due to both the
quantum-size effect and the existence of an amorphous phase in
thin films. In present case, the mean crystallite size increases from
40 to 60 nm (from XRD & SEM) after annealing from 400 to 700 ◦C.
Moreover, it is understood that the amorphous phase is reduced
with increasing annealing temperature, since more energy is sup-
plied for crystallite growth, thus resulting in an improvement in
crystallinity of NiO films. Therefore, it is believed that both the
increase in crystallite size and the reduction in amorphous phase
cause are decreasing in band gap of annealed NiO films. The change
in optical band gap energy, Eg, reveals the impact of annealing on
optical properties of the NiO films.
4.0
3.6
3.2
2.8
2.4
2.0
1.6
o
(a ) 400C
o
(b) 500C
o
(c) 600C
o
(d) 700C
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
400
600
800
1000
Wavelenght(nm)
Fig. 6. Variation of absorbance (˛t) with wavelength (ꢁ) of NiO thin film annealed
at different temperatures.
4. Conclusions
Nanocrystalline nickel oxide thin films were prepared by low-
cost sol–gel spin coating technique. The NiO films were annealed
for various temperatures between 400 and 700 ◦C. The XRD results
revealed that the NiO thin film has a good nanocrystalline cubic
structure. The SEM results depict that a uniform surface morphol-
ogy and the nanoparticles are fine with an average grain size of
about 40–52 nm. The dc electrical conductivity is increased from
10−4 to 10−2 (ꢀ cm)−1 for films annealed at 400–700 ◦C. Optical
absorption studies show low-absorbance in IR and visible region
with band gap 3.86 eV (at 400 ◦C) which was decreased to 3.47 eV
(at 700 ◦C). This has been attributed to the decrease in defect levels.
The P-type electrical conductivity is confirmed from thermo-emf
measurement with no appreciable change in thermoelectric power
after annealing.
The plots of (˛hꢅ)2 versus hꢅ of films annealed at 400–700 ◦C are
shown in Fig. 7. Since the plots are almost linear, the direct nature
of the optical transition in -Ni(OH)2 and NiO is confirmed. Extrap-
olation of these curves to photon energy axis reveals the band gaps.
The band gap was found to be decreased from 3.86 to 3.47 eV for
films annealed at 400–700 ◦C. Varkey and Fort [14] reported the
slightly lower band gaps 3.75 and 3.25 eV for as-prepared NiOOH
and annealed NiO thin films [13]. The decrease in Eg with anneal-
ing temperature could be due to increase in crystalline size and
reduction of defect sites. This is in good agreement with the exper-
grain size has increased with increased annealing temperature. As
the grain size has increased, the grain boundary density of a film
decreased, subsequently, the scattering of carriers at grain bound-
aries has decreased [24]. A continuous increase of optical constants
the particle size of the crystallites along with reduction in porosity.
The decrease in optical band gap energy is generally observed
in the annealed direct-transition-type semiconductor films. Hong
et al. [25] observed a shift in optical band gap of ZnO thin films
from 3.31–3.26 eV after annealing, and attributed this shift to the
Acknowledgment
Authors (VBP) are grateful to DAE-BRNS, for financial support
through the scheme no.2010/37P/45/BRNS/1442.
References
[1] C. Shao, X. Yang, H. Guan, Y. Liu, J. Gong, Inorg. Chem. Commun. 7 (2004) 625.
[2] G. Li, Xi. Huang, Y. Shi, J. Guo, Mater. Lett. 51 (2001) 325.
[3] B. Sasi, K. Gopchandran, P. Manoj, P. Koshy, P. Rao, V.K. Vaidyan, Vacuum 68
(2003) 149.
[4] J.D. Desai, S.K. Min, K.D. Jung, O.S. Joo, Appl. Surf. Sci. 253 (2006) 1781.
[5] J.K. Kang, S.W. Rhee, Thin Solid Films 391 (2001) 57.
[6] K. Nakaoka, J. Ueyama, K. Ogura, J. Electroanal. Chem. 571 (2004) 93.
[7] D.J. Taylor, P.F. Fleig, S.T. Schwab, R.A. Page, Surf. Coat. Technol. 120 (1999)
465.
[8] J.L. Garcia-Miquel, Q. Zhang, S.J. Allen, A. Rougier, A. Blyr, H.O. Davies, A.C. Jones,
T.J. Leedham, P.A. William, S.A. Impey, Thin Solid Films 424 (2003) 165.
[9] J.W. Park, J.W. Park, D.Y. Kim, J.K. Lee, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 23 (2005) 1309.
[10] K.S. Ahn, Y.C. Nah, Y.E. Sung, Appl. Surf. Sci. 199 (2002) 259.
[11] H.L. Chen, Y.M. Lu, W.S. Hwang, Thin Solid Films 514 (2005) 361.
[12] P. Pramanik, S. Bhattacharya, J. Electrochem. Soc. 137 (1990) 3869.
[13] B. Pejova, T. Kocareva, M. Najdoski, I. Grozdanov, Appl. Surf. Sci. 165 (2000) 271.
[14] A.J. Varkey, A.F. Fort, Thin Solid Films 235 (1993) 47.
[15] S.Y. Han, D.H. Lee, Y.J. Chang, S.O. Ryu, T.J. Lee, C.H. Chang, J. Electrochem. Soc.
153 (2006) C382.
[16] S. Banerjee, A. Santhanam, A. Dhathathrenyan, M. Rao, Langmuir 19 (2003)
5522.
[17] E. Comini, G. Faglia, G. Sberveglieri, Z. Pan, Z.L. Wang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81 (2002)
1869.
[18] A. Studenikin, Nickolay. Golego, Michael. Cociovera, J. Appl. Phys. 84 (1998)
2287.
[19] P.K. Ghosh, R. Maity, K.K. Chattopadhyay, Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells 81
(2004) 279.
[20] K. Gurumurugan, D. Mangalaraj, S.K. Narayandass, Y. Nakanishi, Mater. Lett. 28
(1996) 307.
[21] C.N.R. Rao, S.R.C. Vivekchand, K. Biswas, A. Govindaraj, Dalton Trans. 34 (2007)
3728.
Fig. 7. Plot of (˛hꢆ)2 versus (hꢆ) of NiO thin film for different annealing tempera-
tures.