Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 152 ͑3͒ A645-A651 ͑2005͒
A651
Table I. Comparison of electrochemical performancea of SD vs.
CG Ni-YSZ anodes.
methods, was found to agree only if a two-step reaction was as-
sumed, with the slow step occurring only once in the reaction of one
molecule of hydrogen. Further, the relatively low Tafel slope ob-
tained suggests that a second electron transfer step may be rate
limiting.
By comparison with CG Ni-YSZ, our results indicate an initial
tenfold higher hydrogen oxidation activity for the SD Ni-YSZ. Even
so, there is good agreement between the inferred reaction mecha-
nism at the SD and CG electrodes. However, a gradual loss of per-
formance was observed for the SD electrodes that was not seen with
the CG materials, possibly attributed to the thinness of the SD active
layer. To overcome this loss of activity, fabrication of the SD anode
will be further optimized in near future work.
LF i0 ͑A/cm2͒ HF i0 ͑A/cm2͒ EIS i0 ͑A/cm2͒
Tafel slope
SD
CG
415-290
40-60
390-270
35-60
415-245
40-57
310-285
195-210
a In first 3 h of electrochemical evaluation.
obtained from one set of data to the selected EC. R1 is due to series
resistors, such as that originating from the electrolyte between the
WE and RE, contacts, cables, etc. R2 yields i0 and the values ob-
tained from R2 were similar in both magnitude and trends to those
calculated from the LF analysis above. For n/ ϭ 2, the initial i
v
0
Acknowledgments
value is 415 A/cm2, dropping to 245 A/cm2 at the end of the
experiment.
We gratefully acknowledge the overall financial support of the
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
͑NSERC͒, as well as scholarship support for P.G.K. from NSERC
and the Alberta Ingenuity Fund. All imaging was performed at the
Microscopy and Imaging Facility University of Calgary, and we
thank R. Humphrey and Dr. J. Liu for their assistance with these
analyses.
Using the same electrochemical techniques and cell design, ex-
periments have also been carried out on CG Ni-YSZ composite
anodes for comparative purposes ͑Table I͒. Their i0 values increased
during the course of testing, although the final values are still well
below those measured for our as-yet unoptimized SD materials. The
LF i0 values were calculated using n/ ϭ 2, as calculations using
v
The University of Calgary assisted in meeting the publication costs of
this article.
n/ ϭ 1 again showed a twofold disagreement between the LF and
v
HF i0 values, similar to the SD materials. As can be seen from Table
I, the CG material has a lower Tafel slope than the SD material,
closer to what is expected based on the suggested mechanism of
Eq. 4. Overall, however, an approximate ten-fold improvement in
the H2 oxidation activity is seen at our SD materials compared to the
CG anodes during initial testing, although the differences became
somewhat smaller with time of operation.
References
1. S. C. Singhal, Solid State Ionics, 135, 305 ͑2000͒.
2. N. Q. Minh, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 76, 563 ͑1993͒.
3. O. A. Marina, N. L. Canfield, and J. W. Stevenson, Solid State Ionics, 149, 21
͑2002͒.
4. J.-H. Lee, H. Moon, H.-W. Lee, J. Kim, J.-D. Kim, and K.-H. Yoon, Solid State
Ionics, 148, 15 ͑2002͒.
5. R. Vaben, D. Simwonis, and D. Stover, J. Mater. Sci., 36, 147 ͑2001͒.
6. G.-Q. Shao, H. Cai, J.-R. Xie, X.-L. Duan, B.-L. Wu, R.-Z. Yan, and J.-K. Guo,
Mater. Lett., 57, 3287 ͑2003͒.
7. M. Mamak, N. Coombs, and G. Ozin, Adv. Mater. (Weinheim, Ger.), 12, 198
͑2000͒.
8. M. Mamak, N. Coombs, and G. Ozin, Chem. Mater., 13, 3564 ͑2001͒.
9. S. T. Aruna and K. S. Rajam, Scr. Mater., 48, 507 ͑2003͒.
10. M. Mamak, N. Coombs, and G. Ozin, Chem. Commun. (Cambridge), 20, 2300
͑2002͒.
11. F. H. Moser and N. R. Lynam, U.S. Pat. 4,959,247 ͑1990͒.
12. S.-G. Kim, S. W. Nam, S.-P. Yoon, S.-H. Hyun, J. Han, T.-H. Lim, and S.-A. Hong,
J. Mater. Sci., 39, 2683 ͑2004͒.
13. S. H. Chan, X. J. Chen, and K. A. Khor, J. Appl. Electrochem., 31, 1163 ͑2001͒.
14. J. Winkler, P. V. Hendriksen, N. Bonanos, and M. Mogensen, J. Electrochem. Soc.,
145, 1184 ͑1998͒.
15. D. Simwonis, F. Tietz, and D. Stover, Solid State Ionics, 132, 241 ͑2000͒.
16. R. Wilkenhoener, R. Vaben, H. P. Buchkremer, and D. Stover, J. Mater. Sci., 34,
257 ͑1999͒.
Conclusions
The successful synthesis and electrochemical characterization of
SD NiO-YSZ particles demonstrates the excellent potential of these
materials as catalysts for SOFC applications. SD NiO and YSZ were
easily and rapidly produced from metallic nitrate and butoxide pre-
cursors, forming a dispersed nanoparticulate sol in the case of NiO,
or a gel in the case of YSZ. If desired, YSZ gel formation can be
inhibited using acid, so that the nanoparticulate sol remains. All
these materials are easily dried and can withstand heat-treatments of
at least 1000°C while retaining small particle sizes.
After heat-treatment at 1000°C, the NiO and YSZ average par-
ticle sizes were found to be below 50 and 30 nm, respectively, as
measured using XRD and TEM. In each case there appeared to be
some agglomeration of particles to produce larger structures, al-
though small particles could generally be seen within the large ag-
glomerates. Structurally, NiO particles appeared to have well-
defined edges when compared to YSZ particles, which looked less
crystalline in appearance.
Spray coat application of the YSZ SD-powder to pressed YSZ
disks prior to disk firing was found to enhance the adhesion of the
NiO-YSZ composite powders, likely by roughening the YSZ disk
surface. While not yet optimized, these anode layers are between 5
and 10 m in thickness, although the relative thickness of the NiO-
YSZ composite active layer compared to the NiO current collecting
layer has not yet been determined.
Both low- and high-field CV, as well as impedance spectroscopy,
were employed in a half-cell configuration to assess the electro-
chemical performance of these SD anode layers at 800°C in 97:3
H2 :H2O. The exchange current density, obtained from all three
17. T. Fukui, S. Ohara, M. Naito, and K. Nogi, J. Power Sources, 110, 91 ͑2002͒.
18. S. T. Aruna, M. Muthuraman, and K. C. Patil, Solid State Ionics, 111, 45 ͑1998͒.
`
19. M. Marinsek, K. Zupan, and J. Maeek, J. Power Sources, 106, 178 ͑2002͒.
20. J. Fournier, J. Liu, and V. I. Birss, J. Electrochem. Soc., In preparation.
21. F. Tietz, F. J. Dias, D. Simwonis, and D. Stover, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 20, 1025
͑2000͒.
22. S. Primdahl and M. Mogensen, J. Appl. Electrochem., 30, 24 ͑2000͒.
23. M. Guillodo, P. Vernoux, and J. Fouletier, Solid State Ionics, 127, 99 ͑2000͒.
24. A. C. Co, S. J. Xia, and V. I. Birss, in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells, S. C. Singhal and M.
Dokiya, Editors, PV 2003-7, p. 478, The Electrochemical Society Proceedings
Series, Pennington, NJ ͑2003͒.
25. R. De Levie, in Advances in Electrochemistry and Electrochemical Engineering,
Vol. 6, P. Delahay, Editor, p. 329, Interscience Publishers/John Wiley & Sons, New
York ͑1967͒.
26. J. O’M Bockris and A. K. N. Reddy, Modern Electrochemistry, 2A Fundamentals of
Electronics, 2nd ed., p. 1053, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York
͑2000͒.
27. C. F. Zinola, A. M. Castro Luna, W. E. Triaca, and A. J. Arvia, Electrochim. Acta,
11Õ12, 1627 ͑1994͒.
Downloaded on 2014-09-26 to IP 128.59.222.12 address. Redistribution subject to ECS terms of use (see ecsdl.org/site/terms_use) unless CC License in place (see abstract).