Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 155 ͑10͒ H807-H811 ͑2008͒
H811
Figure 7. ͑Color online͒ TEM images of
thin films deposited using Ni͑EtCp͒ and
2
O3 at Tg: ͑a͒ 150°C, ͑b͒ 300°C. ESI map
͑c͒ of thin film deposited using Ni͑EtCp͒
and O3 at Tg = 300°C.
2
4. H. Sato, T. Minami, S. Takata, and T. Yamada, Thin Solid Films, 236, 27 ͑1993͒.
5. C. M. Lampert, Mater. Today, 7, 28 ͑2004͒.
account for the extremely low electronic densities measured in this
film by XRR ͑Table I͒. Similar phenomena were detected in Al2O3
films deposited using trimethylaluminum and O3.41 One possible
contribution to void generation is the high carbon concentration de-
tected in this sample ͑see Fig. 5 and 6͒. Another cause of void
generation could be the low dissociation rate of O3 at 150°C, which
6. M.-J. Lee, S. Seo, D.-C. Kim, S.-E. Ahn, D. H. Seo, I.-K. Yoo, I.-G. Baek, D.-S.
Kim, I.-S. Byun, S.-H. Kim, et al., Adv. Mater. (Weinheim, Ger.), 19, 73 ͑2007͒.
7. S. Seo, M. J. Lee, D. H. Seo, E. J. Jeoung, D.-S. Suh, Y. S. Joung, I. K. Yoo, I. R.
Hwang, S. H. Kim, I. S. Byun, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett., 85, 5655 ͑2004͒.
8. Y.-H. You, B.-S. So, J.-H. Hwang, W. Cho, S. S. Lee, T.-M. Chung, C. G. Kim, and
K.-S. An, Appl. Phys. Lett., 89, 222105 ͑2006͒.
9. Y. Hamakawa, H. Hoshiya, T. Kawabe, Y. Suzuki, R. Arai, K. Nakamoto, M.
Fuyama, and Y. Sugita, IEEE Trans. Magn., 32, 149 ͑1996͒.
10. H. J. M. Swagten, G. J. Strijkers, P. J. H. Bloemen, M. M. H. Willekens, and W. J.
M. de Jonge, Phys. Rev. B, 53, 9108 ͑1996͒.
11. G. A. Niklasson and C. G. Granqvist, J. Mater. Chem., 17, 127 ͑2007͒.
12. E. L. Miller and R. E. Rocheleau, J. Electrochem. Soc., 144, 1995 ͑1997͒.
13. K. Arshak, O. Korostynska, and F. Fahim, Sensors, 3, 176 ͑2003͒.
14. K.-S. Ahn, Y.-C. Nah, and Y.-E. Sung, Appl. Surf. Sci., 199, 259 ͑2002͒.
15. F. F. Ferreira, M. H. Tabacniks, M. C. A. Fantini, I. C. Faria, and A. Gorenstein,
Solid State Ionics, 86–88, 971 ͑1996͒.
16. Y. R. Park and K. J. Kim, J. Cryst. Growth, 258, 380 ͑2003͒.
17. R. C. Korošec and P. Bukovec, Acta Chim. Slov., 53, 136 ͑2006͒.
18. Y. Kakehi, S. Nakao, K. Satoh, and T. Kusaka, J. Cryst. Growth, 237–239, 591
͑2002͒.
19. P. Puspharajah, S. Radhakrishna, and A. K. Arof, J. Mater. Sci., 32, 3001 ͑1997͒.
20. J.-K. Kang and S.-W. Rhee, Thin Solid Films, 391, 57 ͑2001͒.
21. W.-C. Yeh and M. Matsumura, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1, 36, 6884 ͑1997͒.
22. K. Sugimoto, M. Seto, S. Tanaka, and N. Hara, J. Electrochem. Soc., 140, 1586
͑1993͒.
23. M. Utriainen, M. Kröger-Laukkanen, and L. Niinistö, Mater. Sci. Eng., B, 54, 98
͑1998͒.
24. T. S. Yang, W. Cho, M. Kim, K.-S. An, T.-M. Chung, C. G. Kim, and Y. Kim, J.
Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 23, 1238 ͑2005͒.
25. J. Chae, H.-S. Park, and S.-W. Kang, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett., 5, C64 ͑2002͒.
26. T. Suntola, Thin Solid Films, 216, 84 ͑1992͒.
27. M. Leskelä and M. Ritala, Thin Solid Films, 409, 138 ͑2002͒.
28. R. L. Puurunen, J. Appl. Phys., 97, 121301 ͑2005͒.
29. M. Putkonen and L. Niinistö, Top. Organomet. Chem., 9, 125 ͑2005͒.
30. J. W. Elam, A. B. F. Martinson, M. J. Pellin, and J. T. Hupp, Chem. Mater., 18,
3571 ͑2006͒.
31. J. Niinistö, M. Putkonen, L. Niinistö, S. L. Stoll, K. Kukli, T. Sajavaara, M. Ritala,
and M. Leskelä, J. Mater. Chem., 15, 2271 ͑2005͒.
32. K. Kukli, J. Niinistö, A. Tamm, J. Lu, M. Ritala, M. Leskelä, M. Putkonen, L.
Niinistö, F. Song, P. Williams, et al., Microelectron. Eng., 84, 2010 ͑2007͒.
33. J. Niinistö, M. Putkonen, L. Niinistö, F. Song, P. Williams, P. N. Heys, and R.
Odedra, Chem. Mater., 19, 3319 ͑2007͒.
leaves many incompletely reacted Ni͑EtCp͒ ligands in the fabri-
2
cated film. Figure 7b shows that the film grown at 300°C is compact
and composed of three layers. Right above the Si substrate, a light
layer of ϳ2.6 nm thick is thought to be interfacial SiOx, which also
can be further confirmed by the ESI map ͑Fig. 7c͒. The top layer is
pure NiO with a thickness of 11.4 nm, in which small grains of
crystalline phase can be seen. A gray band of ϳ3.9 nm thick, be-
tween the NiO layer and the SiOx one, is identified as an interme-
diate layer. This layer is related to the additional layer necessary to
simulate the XRR data. However, the intermediate layer cannot be
easily distinguished in the ESI maps, indicating that its chemical
composition could be similar to the one of the main layer, just with
a different density.
Conclusions
In conclusion, thin NiO films grown by ALD using Ni͑Cp͒ or
2
Ni͑EtCp͒ as Ni precursor and O3 as the oxygen source were inves-
2
tigated. This study was focused on the influence of growth tempera-
ture on the structural and chemical properties of the prepared films.
At a fixed temperature, the growth rate of films deposited using
Ni͑Cp͒2/O3 is higher than the one of films deposited using
Ni͑EtCp͒2/O3. XRD and FTIR analyses show that films deposited at
Tg ജ 200°C have a cubic polycrystalline structure. The electronic
density of NiO films deposited at 300°C is close to the one of bulk
NiO, especially for the films grown using Ni͑Cp͒2. Compared to the
films deposited using Ni͑EtCp͒2/O3, the films grown with Ni͑Cp͒
2
have a lower carbon content. These results reveal that Ni͑Cp͒ is a
2
more suitable precursor than Ni͑EtCp͒ for the growth of NiO films
2
by ALD, both in terms of growth rate, compositional, and structure
quality. The low density at low Tg probably results from carbon
contaminants and/or voids in the films, as confirmed by ToF-SIMS
and TEM measurements.
34. J. Niinistö, M. Putkonen, L. Niinistö, K. Arstila, T. Saiavaara, J. Lu, M. Ritala, and
M. Leskelä, J. Electrochem. Soc., 153, F39 ͑2006͒.
35. J. Niinistö, M. Putkonen, L. Niinistö, K. Kukli, M. Ritala, and M. Leskelä, J. Appl.
Phys., 95, 84 ͑2004͒.
36. J. Niinistö, A. Rahtu, M. Putkonen, M. Ritala, M. Leskelä, and L. Niinistö, Lang-
muir, 21, 7321 ͑2005͒.
Acknowledgments
37. J. Niinistö, M. Putkonen, and L. Niinistö, Chem. Mater., 16, 2953 ͑2004͒.
38. J. Niinistö, N. Petrova, M. Putkonen, L. Niinistö, K. Arstila, and T. Sajavaara, J.
Cryst. Growth, 285, 191 ͑2005͒.
This work was supported by the European Project EMMA–
Emerging Materials for Mass-Storage Architectures ͑grant no. FP6-
033751͒.
39. G. Scarel, E. Bonera, C. Wiemer, G. Tallarida, S. Spiga, and M. Fanciulli, Appl.
Phys. Lett., 85, 630 ͑2004͒.
40. E. Cianci and M. Fanciulli, Personal communication.
41. S. D. Elliott, G. Scarel, C. Wiemer, and M. Fanciulli, Chem. Mater., 18, 3764
͑2006͒.
National Laboratory MDM assisted in meeting the publication costs of
this article.
42. G. Scarel, C. Wiemer, M. Fanciulli, I. L. Fedushkin, G. K. Fukin, G. A. Dom-
rachev, Y. Lebedinskii, A. Zenkevich, and G. Pavia, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 633,
2097 ͑2007͒.
43. D. W. Berreman, Phys. Rev., 130, 2193 ͑1963͒.
44. ICSD, Inorganic Crystal Structure Database, file no. 61324 ͑2006͒.
References
1. R. J. Powell and W. E. Spicer, Phys. Rev. B, 2, 2182 ͑1970͒.
2. R. H. Kodama, S. A. Makhlouf, and A. E. Berkowitz, Phys. Rev. Lett., 79, 1393
͑1997͒.
3. H. Yamane and M. Kobayashi, J. Appl. Phys., 83, 4862 ͑1998͒.
45. S. Mochizuki and M. Satoh, Phys. Status Solidi B, 106, 667 ͑1981͒.
Downloaded on 2014-09-29 to IP 129.81.226.78 address. Redistribution subject to ECS terms of use (see ecsdl.org/site/terms_use) unless CC License in place (see abstract).