October 2008
Communications of the American Ceramic Society
3467
nanoparticle increases with the increase of heating temperature.
The average crystalline sizes of the obtained NiO nanoparticles
are calculated using the Debye–Sherrer equation to be 6.7, 8.8,
and 17.6 nm for 3201, 3501, and 4001C, respectively.
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
25
20
15
10
5
In the FT-IR spectra of rod-like precursor (Fig. 3(a-I)), the
vibrational bands of CH2 at 2946 and 2869 cmꢁ1 as well as the
stretching band of C–OH at 1061 cmꢁ1 from ethylene glycol unit
are observed; simultaneously, the strong absorption bands of
C5O in acetate ion at 1569 and 1445 cmꢁ1 are also detected.
The three bands appearing around 1034, 883, and 682 cmꢁ1
should be assigned to the stretching and bending vibrations of the
C–O species in the precursor, also further confirming the presence
of acetate ions.20 Therefore, the chemical structure of rod-like
precursor is likely CH3COO–Ni–OC2H4OH. The curve (Fig. 3(a-
II)) of NiO nanorod obtained after 3501C shows no such bands
of rod-like precursor, indicating the complete decomposition of
rod-like precursor. Furthermore, the peak at about 475 cmꢁ1 as-
signed to Ni–O stretching vibration is clearly observed.
The thermogravimetric and differential thermogravimetry
analysis results (Fig. 3(b)) further confirm that the rod-like pre-
cursor formula is CH3COO–Ni–OC2H4OH. The TG curve of
rod-like precursor shows two weight loss (21.2% and 45.6%),
corresponding to the departure of water or excess polyol mol-
ecules and the decomposition of the precursor, respectively. The
formula weight calculated from the weight loss of 45.6% is 178
g/mol, which is very close to the formula weight of CH3COO–
Ni–OC2H4OH (179 g/mol).
0
1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
Ep/eV
300
400
500
600
700
800
Wavelength (nm)
Fig. 4. UV-vis spectrum and (aEp)2 vs Ep curve (inset) for polycrystal-
line NiO nanorod calcined at 3501C.
1/2 for an indirect transition.21 Hence, the optical band gap for
the absorption peak can be obtained by extrapolating the linear
portion of the (aEp)2 vs Ep curve to zero (the inset of Fig. 4). The
value of band gap of the polycrystalline NiO nanorod is about
3.7 eV, which is smaller than the value of bulk material
(4.0 eV).22 It is well known that semiconductors with nanoscale
size show a blue shift in their spectra due to the quantum con-
finement effects. However, the as-obtained samples have an Eg
smaller than the bulk one. This effect is likely due to the chem-
ical defects or vacancies present in the intergranular regions
generating new energy level to reduce the band gap energy.23,24
UV-vis spectrum of polycrystalline NiO nanorods is shown in
Fig. 4. A strong absorption in the UV region is observed at
wavelength smaller than 375 nm, which should be attributed to
band gap absorption of NiO nanoparticles assembling the poly-
crystalline NiO nanorods. The optical transition type and the
optical band gap (Eg) can be calculated by using the following
equation:
n
IV. Conclusions
ðaEpÞ / KðEp ꢁ EgÞ
The microwave-assisted method has been successfully used for
fast synthesis of rod-shaped CH3COO–Ni–OC2H4OH that can
be transformed into polycrystalline NiO nanorods at different
temperature of 3201, 3501, and 4001C. While increasing the
heating temperature, the size of NiO nanoparticles becomes
larger. The optical absorption band gap of the polycrystalline
NiO nanorod is determined to be 3.7 eV. This method is simple,
fast, and low cost for the preparation of polycrystalline NiO
nanorods.
where K is a constant, Ep is the discrete photon energy, a is the
absorbance coefficient, and n is either 2 for direct transition or
II
Ni-O
I
References
1Y. N. Xia, P. D. Yang, Y. G. Sun, Y. Y. Wu, B. Mayers, B. Gates, Y. D. Yin,
F. Kim, and H. Q. Yan, ‘‘One-Dimensional Nanostructures: Synthesis, Charac-
terization, and Applications,’’ Adv. Mater., 15, 353–89 (2003).
(a)
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
2J. Park, E. Kang, S. U. Son, H. M. Park, M. K. Lee, J. Kim, K. W. Kim,
H. J. Noh, J. H. Park, C. J. Bae, J. G. Park, and T. Hyeon, ‘‘Monodisperse
Nanoparticles of Ni and NiO: Synthesis, Characterization, Self-Assembled Super-
lattices, and Catalytic Applications in the Suzuki Coupling Reaction,’’ Adv.
Mater., 17, 429–33 (2005).
-1
Wavenumber cm
0.5
100
0.0
–0.5
–1.0
–1.5
–2.0
–2.5
–3.0
–3.5
–4.0
3X. Wang, L. Li, Y. G. Zhang, S. T. Wang, Z. D. Zhang, L. F. Fei, and
Y. T. Qian, ‘‘High-Yield Synthesis of NiO Nanoplatelets and their Excellent
Electrochemical Performance,’’ Cryst. Growth Des., 6, 2163–6 (2006).
4M. C. A. Fantini, F. F. Ferreira, and A. Gorenstein, ‘‘Theoretical and Exper-
imental Results on Au–NiO and Au–CoO Electrochromic Composite Films,’’
Solid State Ionics, 152–153, 867–71 (2002).
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
5J. Bandara and H. Weerasinghe, ‘‘Solid-State Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell with
P-Type NiO as a Hole Collector,’’ Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 85, 385–90 (2005).
6X. Wang, J. M. Song, L. S. Gao, J. Y. Jin, H. G. Zheng, and Z. D. Zhang,
‘‘Optical and Electrochemical Properties of Nanosized NiO via Thermal Decom-
position of Nickel Oxalate Nanofibres,’’ Nanotechnology, 16, 37–9 (2005).
7Y. R. Park and K. J. Kim, ‘‘Sol–Gel Preparation and Optical Characterization
of NiO and Ni1ꢁxZnxO Thin Films,’’ J. Cryst. Growth, 258, 380–4 (2003).
8Y. D. Wang, C. L. Ma, X. D. Sun, and H. D. Li, ‘‘Preparation of Nanocrys-
talline Metal Oxide Powders with the Surfactant-Mediated Method,’’ Inorg. Chem.
Commun., 5, 751–5 (2002).
(b)
100
200
300
400
500
600
Temperature ( c)
9S. A. Needham, G. X. Wang, and H. K. Liu, ‘‘Synthesis of NiO Nanotubes
for Use as Negative Electrodes in Lithium Ion Batteries,’’ J. Power Sources, 159,
254–9 (2006).
Fig. 3. (a) Fourier-transformed infrared spectra of the as-obtained
rod-like precursor (I) and as-annealed polycrystalline NiO nanorod
(II); (b) the curves of thermogravimetric analysis and differential
thermogravimetry analysis of the rod-shaped precursor.
10V. G. Pol, Y. Langzam, and A. Zaban, ‘‘Application of Microwave Super-
heating for the Synthesis of TiO2 Rods,’’ Langmuir, 23, 11211–6 (2007).