´
GONZALEZ-ALATORRE ET AL.
274
been found between carcinogenic activity and water–
hexane partition coefficients [5]. As far as the authors
are aware, there is no published data regarding a cor-
relation between partition coefficients and the biologi-
cal activity of nitrosoalkylureas. This lack of data is
possibly due to the difference between the carcino-
genesis mechanism of nitrosamides and that of ni-
trosamines. In nitrosamines, which are more stable in
aqueous solutions than nitrosoalkylureas [6], the re-
quirements for carcinogenic potency appear dominated
by the structure of the unmetabolized precarcinogen
[5]. Therefore, the transport of the original molecule
to its active site has an important effect on its potency.
Nitrosoalkylureas, unstable in an aqueous medium [3],
and therefore direct carcinogenic agents, are unlikely
to have the transport of molecules to their active sites as
the rate limiting step in the carcinogenesis mechanism.
The mechanistic model for the biological activity of
nitrosoureas is based on the relative ease with which
these compounds decompose, giving way to the diazo-
nium ions responsible for the alkylation of the DNA
molecules [4–6]. Diverse studies have been conducted
to relate the chemical structure of the nitrosoureas (ni-
trosomonoalkylureas and nitrosodialkylureas) to their
biological activity to form a more solid base for this
model [2,3]. The experiments were carried out using
different experimental animals and nitrosoureas with
different stabilities and chemical structures [7–9]. It
has not been possible to establish a simple pattern that
indicates that the observed mutagenic power is the sole
consequence of the stability of the associated nitroso-
compound; rather, it depends on sex and type of ex-
perimental animal, application form, dose and func-
tional group linked to the N-nitroso compound, among
others.
EXPERIMENTAL
Solutions of 1,3-dimethylurea (DMU), 1,3-diethylurea
(DEU), 1,3-dipropylurea (DPU), 1,3-dibuthylurea
(DBU), 1,3-diallylurea (DAU), and sodium nitrite
(NaNO2) were prepared from analytical reagents
(Aldrich Co. Mexico). Ionic strength (I) was main-
tained with NaClO4 monohydrate (Aldrich Co.
Mexico).
It was found that N-nitrosodimethylurea, N-
nitrosodimethylurea, N-nitrosodipropylurea, and N-
nitrosodibuthylurea products showed a maximum ab-
sorbance of 249 nm whereas the N-nitrosodiallylurea
had 238 nm. At these wavelengths, the nitrite mo-
lar absorption coefficient is negligible with respect
to the nitrosoalkylureas (e.g., for nitrosomethylurea
ε240 = 3500 M−1 cm−1 and ε240 = 8 M−1 cm−1 for
nitrite).
Nitrosation kinetics were recorded using a Perkin-
Elmer UV/vis spectrophotometer lambda 25 equipped
with a thermoelectric cell holder thermostat Haake
DC1 maintaining the temperature within 0.1◦C.
Acidity was measured with an Ultra Basic Bench top
Denver pH meter.
The initial rate method was applied to the nitrosation
of diureas.
RNHCONHR + NaNO2
(DRU)
(nitrite)
H3+
O
−→ RN(NO)CONHR + Na+ + 2H2O
(NDRU)
where R = Methyl, Ethyl, Propyl, Buthyl, and Allyl
groups.
Studies have been undertaken on the reactions of
the nitrosation of ureas [10–15] and as a result, a reac-
tion mechanism for the nitrosation of monoureas with
the general formula RNHCONH2 (R = Methyl, ethyl,
propyl, buthyl, and allylurea) has been proposed [11].
The results of the kinetic study on a series of diureas
with the general formula RNHCONHR (R = Methyl,
ethyl, propyl, buthyl, and allylurea), in an aqueous-
perchloric acid medium, using the initial rate method,
are presented in this work. By using this method it was
possible to carry out the kinetic study at slow reaction
rates where it would have been impossible to use the
integral method [10,11]. This study produced an ex-
perimental rate equation consistent with the reaction
mechanism proposed in previous works [10–15].
The kinetic study yielded the reactivity order associ-
ated with the five nitrosation reactions and was related
to the structure of the substrate to be nitrosated and the
N-nitroso compound produced.
The rate expression is
ro = k[DRU]αo [nitrite]βo
(1)
In order to determine the reaction orders, Eq. (1)
became
ꢀ
ꢁꢀ
ꢁ
1
εNDRU
dA
dt
ro =
= k[DRU]αo [nitrite]βo (2)
t→0
where εNDRU is the molar absorption coefficient of the
corresponding nitrosodiurea and A is the absorbance of
the NDRU at the wavelength of maximum absorption.
In the determination of the influence of acidity on
k, all the variables involved in the nitrosation, such
as nitrite concentrations and DRU, ionic strength, and
temperature, were kept constant whereas the proton
concentration was varied in the interval 1 × 10−4
<
[H+] < 1.7 × 10−3 M. The following expression,