Macromolecules, Vol. 35, No. 9, 2002
2-Deoxydextrans 3403
Services; Mp ) 400-1 000 000; Mw/Mn < 1.10). 1H NMR
spectra (300 MHz) and 13C {H} spectra (75 MHz) were recorded
using a Varian Inova Mecury-300 NMR spectrometer. Chemi-
cal shifts (δ, ppm) were referenced to the residual proton or
carbon signal of the solvent. Melting points were measured
using a MEL-TEMP II instrument and are uncorrected.
Polymerization conversions were determined from 1H NMR
spectra by calculating the ratio of peak integrations for the
C-2 protons of the monomer (δ ) 1.90-2.10) and polymer
(δ ) 1.56-1.80 and δ ) 2.22-2.43).
Ma ss Sp ectr om etr y. Mass spectra were recorded on an
external source HiResMALDI (IonSpec Corp., Irvine, CA)
equipped with a 4.7 T magnet. The HiResMALDI was equipped
with an LSI 337 nm nitrogen laser. Mass spectra were also
recorded on a Proflex III MALDI-TOF (Bruker-Daltonics,
Billerica, MA) with a 337 nm nitrogen laser under the same
conditions. The matrix used was 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (5
mg/100 µL in ethanol). A 0.01 M solution of NaCl in methanol
was used as dopant. The solution of the polysaccharide (1 µL)
was applied to the MALDI probe followed by sodium dopant
(1 µL) and matrix solution (1 µL). The sample was dried under
a stream of hot air and subjected to mass spectrometric
analysis. For the collision-induced dissociation (CID) experi-
ment, the appropriate isolation pulses were programmed
starting at 3 s after the initial ionization and followed by
sustained off-resonance irradiation (SORI) excitation at 6 s (1
s, 5 V base to peak, +1000 Hz off-resonance). At a background
pressure of 10-10 Torr, argon gas was administered through a
pulsed valve at 6 and 6.5 s (peak pressure 5 × 10-5 Torr). Final
excitation for detection was performed 12 s after the initial
laser pulse.
4.63 (1H, m, 5-H), 4.23 (1H, dd, 6-Hendo), 3.95 (1H, m, 2-H),
3.82(1H, dd, 6-Hexo), 2.21 and 2.12 (6H, 2s, 2 × CH3CO2-).
3,4-Di-O-a cetyl-1,6-a n h yd r o-2-d eoxy-â-D-glu cose, Com -
p ou n d 4.12 A solution of compound 3 (8.60 g, 24.0 mmol) and
R,R′-azobis(isobutyronitrile) (0.640 g, 3.80 mmol) in dry ben-
zene (500 mL) was degassed by bubbling N2 through the
solution for 20 min. Tri-n-butyltin hydride (14.0 g, 48.0 mmol)
was added to the solution, and the solution was heated at
reflux for 2 h. TLC (3:2 petroleum ether-ethyl acetate) showed
complete conversion of compound 3 (Rf ) 0.4) into compound
4 (Rf ) 0.3). The mixture was concentrated, and the residue
was dissolved in acetonitrile (200 mL). The solution was
washed with petroleum ether (3 × 200 mL) and then evapo-
rated to give compound 4 (4.70 g, 85% yield). This material
was used in the next step without further purification.1H NMR
(CDCl3): δ (ppm) 5.57 (1H, s, H-1), 4.86 (1H, ddd, H-3), 4.69
(1H, s, H-4), 4.58 (1H, m, H-5), 4.19 (1H, dd, H-6endo), 3.78 (1H,
dd, H-6exo), 2.2-2.1 (1H, m, H-2ax), 2.14 and 2.08 (6H, 2s, 2 ×
CH3CO2-), 1.82 (1H, d, H-2eq).
1,6-An h yd r o-2-d eoxy-â-D-glu cose, Com p ou n d 5. A solu-
tion of compound 4 (4.60 g, 20 mmol) in 10:10:1 CH3OH-H2O-
Et3N (500 mL) was stirred for 5 h at room temperature and
then concentrated. The residue was dried by repeated distil-
lation with absolute EtOH (at least five times) and then by
placing the residue under vacuum in the presence of P2O5 to
give compound 5 (2.90 g, 98% yield). This material was used
in the next step without further purification.
1,6-An h ydr o-3,4-di-O-ben zyl-2-deoxy-â-D-glu cose, Mon o-
m er 1. A solution of compound 5 (1.46 g, 10 mmol) in 40 mL
of dry DMF was cooled to 0 °C, and benzyl bromide (2.85 mL,
24 mmol) was added. Next, NaH (60% dispersion in mineral
oil, 1.60 g, 40.0 mmol) was added in portions with stirring at
0 °C. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 h
and then cooled to 0 °C. Next, CH3OH (15 mL) was added to
decompose the excess NaH. Chloroform (30 mL) was then
added to the mixture, which was washed with deionized water
(3 × 40 mL). The residue was added to 20 mL of CH3OH, and
the mineral oil was removed by separating the precipitate. The
precipitate, monomer 1, was recrystallized from CH3OH to
yield pure 6 (2.30 g, 71% yield); mp ) 56 °C. 1H NMR
(CDCl3): δ (ppm) 1.90-2.10 (1H, dd, 2-Heq), 2.00-2.10 (1H,
dd, 2-Hax), 3.41 (1H, s, 4-H), 3.63-3.73 (1H, dd, 6-Hex), 4.20
(1H, dd, 6-Hendo), 3.75 (1H, s, 3-H), 4.45 (1H, d, 5-H), 5.70 (1H,
s, 1-Heq), 4.5-4.6 (4H, m, C6H5CH2-), 7.35 (10H, m, 2 ×
C6H5-). 13C {1H} NMR (CDCl3): δ (ppm) 33.5 (C-2), 64.7
(C-6), 71.8 (C-5), 72.5 (-CH2-C6H5), 74.2 (C-4), 76.1 (C-3),
127.8 and 128.2 (-C6H5), 138.2 (C-1 of -C6H5).
NOTE: The following synthesis is an amalgamation of parts
of three procedures. The adaptations were made to eliminate
the need for column chromatography in the purification steps,
thereby allowing for a higher throughput to the synthesis.
D-Glu ca l, Com p ou n d 1.10 A solution of tri-O-acetyl-D-glucal
(10.9 g, 40.0 mmol) in 10:10:1 CH3OH-H2O-Et3N (500 mL)
was stirred for 5 h at room temperature and then concentrated.
The residue was dried by repeated distillation with absolute
EtOH (at least five times) and then by placing the residue
under vacuum in the presence of P2O5 to give compound 1.
This material was used directly in the next step without
further purification.
1,6-An h yd r o-2-d eoxy-2-iod o-â-D-glu cose, Com p ou n d 2.
This compound was synthesized largely according to the
method of Tailler et al.11 The main steps were as follows:
compound 1 (9.66 g, 39.0 mmol) was treated with bis-tri-n-
butyltin oxide (19.1 g, 32.0 mmol) and activated, powdered 3
Å molecular sieves (16 g) in refluxing dry acetonitrile (400 mL)
for 3 h. The mixture was cooled to 5 °C under nitrogen, and
iodine (15.2 g, 60.0 mmol) was added in one portion. The dark
brown mixture was stirred for 15 min at 5 °C and then for 2
h at room temperature. TLC (1:1 toluene-acetone) showed the
complete conversion of compound 1 (Rf ) 0.14) into compound
2 (Rf ) 0.45). The mixture was filtered through Celite and
concentrated. Saturated, aqueous Na2S2O3 (200 mL) and then
hexane (200 mL) were added to the residue, and the biphasic
mixture was stirred vigorously for 3 h. Next, the aqueous phase
was continuously extracted with ethyl acetate for 8 h. The
extract was concentrated to give compound 2 (8.00 g, 78%
yield), which was used in the next step without further
P olym er iza tion . The typical polymerization procedure was
as follows: in an oven-dried Schlenk flask under nitrogen
atmosphere, a solution of monomer 1 in CH2Cl2 was prepared
using the appropriate quantities of reagents. The solution was
degassed by three cycles of freezing, evacuation, and thawing.
Sequentially, solutions of initiator in CH2Cl2 (prepared by
adding stoichiometric, dry HCl in ether to isobutyl vinyl ether)
and ZnI2 in diethyl ether were added using dry syringes. The
solution was stirred at a defined temperature. At predeter-
mined intervals, a sample of the polymerization solution was
taken using a dry syringe and quenched by addition to a
solution of Et3N/CH3OH (1:1 v/v) in 2 mL of THF. The samples
were used for both the GPC and NMR measurements. The
remainder of the polymerization solution was quenched using
Et3N/CH3OH, and the polymer was isolated by precipitating
three times from THF into CH3OH and drying under vacuum
to yield a white powder. The conversions estimated by 1H NMR
1
purification. H NMR [(CD3)2SO]: δ (ppm) 5.61 (1H, s, H-1),
5.52 (1H, d, OH-3), 5.20 (1H, d, OH-4), 4.42 (1H, m, H-5), 4.01
(1H, d, H-6endo), 3.94 (1H, m, H-3), 3.83 (1H, m, H-2), 3.52 (1H,
dd, H-6exo), 3.45 (1H, m, H-4).
1
were nearly equal to the yield of polymers. H NMR (CDCl3):
3,4-Di-O-a ce t yl-1,6-a n h yd r o-2-d e oxy-2-iod o-â-D-glu -
cose, Com p ou n d 3. Crude compound 2 (8.00 g, 30.0 mmol)
was treated overnight at room temperature with pyridine (24
mL) and acetic anhydride (16 mL). The mixture was cooled to
5 °C, treated with CH3OH (40 mL), and concentrated. The
residue was dissolved in 200 mL of ethyl acetate. The solution
was washed with water (3 × 200 mL) and concentrated to give
compound 3 (9.70 g, 92% yield). This material was used in the
next step without further purification. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ
(ppm) 5.69 (1H, s, 1-H), 5.13 (1H, m, 3-H), 4.71 (1H, m, 4-H),
δ (ppm) 0.89 (broad, end group CH3), 1.58-1.73 (broad, H-2ax),
2.15-2.42 (broad, H-2eq), 3.17-3.80 (broad multilane signal,
H-4, H-5, and H-6), 3.84-4.05 (broad singlets, H-3), 4.50-4.70
and 5.02-5.08 (broad, -CH2-C6H5), 4.90-5.01 (broad, H-1),
7.12-7.41 (broad, 2 × -C6H5). 13C {1H} NMR (CDCl3): δ (ppm)
35.5 (C-2), 66.0 (C-6), 70.8 (C-5), 75.0 (-CH2- C6H5), 77.8 (C-
4), 78.2 (C-3), 127.2 and 128.6 (-C6H5), 138.8 (C-1 of -C6H5).
The cyclization of monomer 1 was conducted using the same
procedure as the polymerization of monomer 1 except that
isobutyl vinyl ether was omitted.