Inorganic Chemistry
Communication
a
a
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditions
Table 2. EuII-Catalyzed Hydrosilylation with 5
b
loading
(%)
conv
b
7a/7a′/7aa or 8a/8a′/
yield
c
b
entry catalyst
(%)
8aa
(%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2
3
3
EuN
1
3
3
2
1
1
72
>99
>99
40
0
49
94
0
94/4/2
99/0/1
99/0/1
99/0/1
55
87
87
30
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1
d
e
f
93/0/7
91/0/9
37
73
f
1
a
0.01 mmol of catalyst, 0.4 mL of solvent, 1.0−2.0 mmol of 4a, and
1.2−2.4 mmol of silane (5 for entries 1−6 and 6 for entries 7 and 8),
b
23 °C, 0.5 h. The conversions of 4a and selectivity were determined
by gas chromatography (GC)−mass spectrometry (MS) with a crude
c
d
reaction mixture. Isolated yields of 7a and 8a. EuN = Eu[N-
e
f
(SiMe3)2]2(THF)2. THF as the solvent. 80 °C, 6 h.
besides the major Markovnikov product (7a). Under the same
reaction conditions, 3 (entry 2) could enable highly efficient
and selective hydrosilylation reaction, leading to the
quantitative production of 7a in 99% selectivity even in 0.5
mol % catalyst loading (entry 3). For comparison, EuN and 1
were also examined as catalysts. Although EuN displayed high
selectivity (99%), only 40% of 4a could be hydrosilylated
(entry 4), while CAAC was inactive for this hydrosilylation
(entry 5). 4a was hydrosilylated in moderate conversion (49%)
in THF (entry 6) probably because of the interactions of the
solvent molecules with Eu ion, which suppresses the
coordination−insertion process of alkenes. To our delight,
catalytic hydrosilylation of 4a with the secondary silane
Ph2SiH2 (6) was also carried out efficiently (94% conversion
and 91% selectivity) to yield the Markovnikov product 8a
(entry 7). In sharp contrast, 2 has no activity for the same
reaction (entry 8). Other silanes were tested in 4a hydro-
silylation (Table S1). n-C6H13SiH3 and PhMeSiH2 exhibited
moderate activity (62 and 70% conversions) and good-to-poor
selectivity (94 and 74%). Et2SiH2 was inactive with catalyst 3.
Under the optimized conditions with 5 as the silylation
reagent, a range of aryl- and silylalkenes (4a−4t) were
examined. As shown in Table 2, the secondary silane products
(7a−7t) were generated in good-to-high yields (62−95%) and
high Markovnikov selectivity (from 90 to >99%). The
regioselectivity of the arylalkenes is attributed to η3
coordination between the Ln ion and aromatic fragment,16
whereas that of silylalkenes might arise from polarization of the
Si−C bond, in which the α-C atom with higher electron
density leads to bonding with the Ln ion.17 The catalytic
protocol tolerated alkoxy (7f−7h), amino (7i), alkylsilyl (7m−
7p), arylsilyl (7q and 7r), and hydrosilyl (7s and 7t) groups.
Although the selective hydrosilylation of arylalkenes can be
realized by a number of metal complex catalysts, the reaction
for silylalkenes could only be achieved with a couple of metal
catalysts.18 Furthermore, because the alkenes containing two
functional groups, like Si−H bond and double bond, preferred
stepwise polymerization as monomers with transition-metal
catalysts, the hydrosilylation of hydrosilylalkene has not been
a
0.01 mmol of 3 and 0.4 mL of toluene. The percent refers to the
isolated yields. The percent in brackets refers to the regioselectivity
determined by GC−MS measurement of the crude reaction mixture.
b
c
1.0 mmol of alkene and 1.2 mmol of 5. 0.2 mmol of alkene and 0.24
d
mmol of 5. Yields determined by GC−MS measurement of the
crude product.
reported.19 The existence of the two different hydrosilyl groups
in product 7t was confirmed by the proton-coupled 29Si NMR
spectrum, in which one doublet peak and one triplet peak were
observed (Figure S22). Moreover, the bulky 1,1-disubstituted
alkenes (α-methyl 7k and α-phenyl 7l) can be smoothly
catalyzed by 3 to generate the Markovnikov products in 62 and
78% yields and excellent regioselectivity (>99%).
With the secondary silane 6 as the silylation reagent (Table
3), complex 3 enabled the hydrosilylation of aryl- and
silylalkenes (4a−i, 4l, 4q, and 4s), leading to the tertiary
silane products (8a−8l) in moderate-to-high yields (49−90%)
and high Markovnikov selectivity (from 90 to >99%). The
arylalkenes with OMe and NMe2 substituents on the phenyl
rings and silylalkene with a PhMeSiH substituent can be
hydrosilylated smoothly to give the regioselective products 8f−
8i and 8l) in good yields (61−85%). Furthermore, complex 3
also catalyzed the hydrosilylation of bulky α-phenylstyrene
with 6 (8j) in 49% yield and excellent regioselectivity (>99%).
For complex 3-catalyzed hydrosilylation (Tables 2 and 3), the
activities of the primary silane and α-alkenes were higher than
C
Inorg. Chem. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX