Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 4 of 5
Strittmatter, A. W.; Gottschalk, G.; Sussmuth, R. D.; Borriss, R. J.
erated by MupMT1 to the corresponding (2S,3S)-2-
methyl-3-hydroxybutyryl-ACP product (epimerizing A2-
type KR domain). Interestingly, in sequence alignments
MupKR1 lacks the characteristic A2-type sequence
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 4024-4036. b) Moldenhauer, J.; Chen, X. H.;
Borriss, R.; Piel, J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2007, 46, 8195-8197.
c) Butcher, R. A.; Schroeder, F. C.; Fischbach, M. A.; Straight, P. D.;
Kolter, R.; Walsh, C. T.; Clardy, J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 2007,
104, 1506-1509.
7d,7e
markers
and appears to cluster instead with EryKR6
(5) El-Sayed, A. K.; Hothersall, J.; Cooper, S. M.; Stephens, E.;
Simpson, T. J.; Thomas, C. M. Chem. Biol. 2003, 10, 419-430.
and other non-epimerizing A1-type domains that gener-
ate (2R,3S)-2-methyl-3-hydroxybutyryl-ACP products
(
6) a) Garg, A.; Xie, X.; Keatinge-Clay, A.; Khosla, C.; Cane, D.
(
Figure S15).
E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 10190-10193. b) Xie, X.; Garg, A.;
Khosla, C.; Cane, D. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 3283-3292.
(7) a) Castonguay, R.; He, W.; Chen, A. Y.; Khosla, C.; Cane, D.
E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 13758-13769. b) Castonguay, R.;
Valenzano, C. R.; Chen, A. Y.; Keatinge-Clay, A.; Khosla, C.; Cane,
D. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 11598-11599. c) Valenzano, C.
R.; Lawson, R. J.; Chen, A. Y.; Khosla, C.; Cane, D. E. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2009, 131, 18501-18511. d) You, Y. O.; Khosla, C.; Cane, D. E.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 7406-7409. e) Keatinge-Clay, A. T.
Chem. Biol. 2007, 14, 898-908.
In bongkrekic acid (1), the configuration of the inter-
mediate 2-methyl-3-hydroxy-4-methylhex-3-enoyl-ACP
generated by BonKR2 is obscured in the final product
by the BonDH2-catalyzed dehydration. To address this
issue, we have recently expressed BonKR2 and estab-
lished that it is a non-epimerizing A1-type KR that ste-
reospecifically converts (2R)-2-methylpentanoyl-ACP to
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
the
corresponding
(2R,3S)-2-methyl-3-hydroxy-
(8) Stevens, D. C.; Wagner, D. T.; Manion, H. R.; Alexander, B.
K.; Keatinge-Clay, A. T. J. Antibiot. 2016, 69, 567-570.
18
pentanoyl-ACP. Notably, syn dehydration by BonDH2
would be expected to generate the (Z)-3-methyl-2-enoyl-
ACP intermediate from which bongkrekic acid (1) is
directly derived. This and related transformations are
currently under investigation.
(
9) Skiba, M. A.; Sikkema, A. P.; Fiers, W. D.; Gerwick, W. H.;
Sherman, D. H.; Aldrich, C. C.; Smith, J. L. ACS Chem. Biol. 2016,
1, 3319-3327. These authors stated that the acidity of the H-2 proton
1
of the 2-methyl-3-ketoacyl-ACP generated by CurJ precludes che-
moenzymatic assignment of the C2-methyl stereochemistry.
(
10) Hendricks, C. L.; Ross, J. R.; Pichersky, E.; Noel, J. P.; Zhou,
Z. S. Anal. Biochem. 2004, 326, 100-105.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
(11) The use of the ACP-conjugated substrate is essential since the
rate of epimerization of the 2-methyl-3-ketoacyl-ACP has been shown
Supporting Information.
-1
to be <0.003 min , compared to a kepim for the considerably more
Experimental methods, including C-MT design and expres-
sion, coupled KR assays, kinetic assays, and GC-MS and
ESI-MS analysis. This material is available free of charge
at http://pubs.acs.org.
-1
labile -SNAC derivative of ~0.15 min (refs 7a and 7c).
(
12) Quadri, L. E.; Weinreb, P. H.; Lei, M.; Nakano, M. M.; Zuber,
P.; Walsh, C. T. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 1585-1595.
(13) Zheng, J.; Piasecki, S. K.; Keatinge-Clay, A. T. ACS Chem.
Biol. 2013, 8, 1964-1971.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
(14) Garg, A.; Khosla, C.; Cane, D. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013,
1
35, 16324-16327.
(15) Although competing reduction of non-methylated 3-
ketopentanoyl-ACP would not have affected the validity of the as-
signment of the stereochemistry of the C2-methylation using the cou-
pled KR assay, the corresponding 3-hydroxypentanoyl-ACP was
notably absent from the assay products, as analyzed by chiral GC-MS
of the derived methyl esters. Control kinetic assays and stereochemi-
cal analysis showed that while each of the KR domains used in the
assay was capable of reducing the unmethylated 3-ketopentanoyl-
David E. Cane, David_Cane@brown.edu
Notes
No competing financial interests have been declared.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by grants from the U. S. National
Institutes of Health, GM022172 to D.E.C. and GM087934
to C.K. We thank Prof. Adrian Keatinge-Clay and Drew T.
Wagner of the University of Texas, Austin for a generous
gift of the expression plasmids for BaeMT9, DifMT1, and
MupMT1.
SNAC substrate, the relative kcat/K
ketopentanoyl-SNAC by TylKR1, EryKR6, or EryKR1 was typically
-5 times greater than that for reduction of 3-ketopentanoyl-SNAC,
with the relative kcat/K values for the (2S)-methyl-specific EryKR6-
m
for reduction of (±)-2-methyl-3-
3
m
G324T/L333H and AmpKR2-G355T/Q364H being 55 and 2, respec-
tively (Tables S4, S5, and S8, Figures S5-S7, S11-S13). Both TylKR1
and AmpKR2-G355T/Q364H reduced 3-ketopentanoyl-SNAC exclu-
sively to (3R)-3-hydroxypentanoyl-SNAC, while reduction by either
EryKR6 or EryKR6-G324T/L333H gave essentially racemic 3-
hydroxypentanoyl-SNAC. A further control showed that the 3-
ketopentanoyl-ACP intermediate was generated continuously over the
REFERENCES
(1) a) Cane, D. E. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 27517-27523. b)
Hopwood, D. A. Methods in Enzymology. Complex enzymes in mi-
crobial natural product biosynthesis, part B: polyketides, aminocou-
marins and carbohydrates; Academic Press: United States, 2009; Vol.
1
-h time course of the ketoreductase assay.
16) Marsden, A. F.; Caffrey, P.; Aparicio, J. F.; Loughran, M. S.;
(
Staunton, J.; Leadlay, P. F. Science 1994, 263, 378-380.
(17) The kinetics and relative substrate specificity of the competi-
tion between C-MT and KR domains have been analyzed in detail for
the iterative fungal PKS lovastatin synthase: Cacho, R. A.; Thuss, J.;
Xu, W.; Sanichar, R.; Gao, Z.; Nguyen, A.; Vederas, J. C.; Tang, Y. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 15688-15691.
4
59.
(2) a) Cheng, Y. Q.; Tang, G. L.; Shen, B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U
S A 2003, 100, 3149-3154. b) Helfrich, E. J.; Piel, J. Nat. Prod. Rep.
016, 33, 231-316.
3) Moebius, N.; Ross, C.; Scherlach, K.; Rohm, B.; Roth, M.;
2
(
(18) X. Xie, unpublished observation.
Hertweck, C. Chem. Biol. 2012, 19, 1164-1174.
(4) a) Chen, X. H.; Vater, J.; Piel, J.; Franke, P.; Scholz, R.;
Schneider, K.; Koumoutsi, A.; Hitzeroth, G.; Grammel, N.;
ACS Paragon Plus Environment