052108-3
H. Liu and P. D. Ye
Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 052108 (2011)
a 20 V step. We achieve the highest modulation rate of 76.1%
for Device 1 and 61.8% for Device 2. All these indicate a sig-
nificant enhancement in modulation for Bi Te thin flakes at
2
3
room temperature, using Al O high-k as a top-gate dielectric
2
3
and dual gate control. Development of a perfect high-k/TI
interface is a must to realize real device applications based on
TI FETs. In particular, the truly attractive property of TI as a
channel material for device applications is its surface channel
with high carrier mobility and velocity. Any formation of top-
gate dielectric on semiconductors cannot be as important as on
TI since the conducting channel is on the surface.
FIG. 3. (Color online) Drain current vs dual gate modulation of two Bi
TI FETs. (a) Bi Te TI FET with a 10 nm Al deposited by TMA and
O and (b) Bi Te TI FET with 10 nm Al deposited by TMA and O
2 3
Te
2
3
2 3
O
H
2
2
3
2
O
3
3
.
particular, the top interface. Poor interface conditions easily
result in a strong degradation of field-effect modulation effi-
In conclusion, we have investigated ALD high-k oxide
formation on Bi Te as a top-gate dielectric. AFM studies
2
3
19
ciency as demonstrated in ALD high-k/III-V MOSFETs.
Compared to III-V MOSFETs, such interface degradation in
Bi Te could impose more serious problems in device per-
reveal the feasibility of direct ALD of high-k dielectrics on
this layered material. Electrical characterization shows a pro-
nounced modulation by both top-gate and back-gate with the
highest modulation of 76.1% achieved with simultaneous dual
gate control. However, at this point, the top-gate modulation
is not as effective as the back-gate modulation at the same
electrical field due to the degraded interface between the ALD
dielectric and the TI. Further studies on protecting the TI sur-
2
3
formance due to its unique carrier transport properties. It has
been stated in previous studies that the conductance of those
topological insulators is composed of two parts: the bulk con-
ductance and the surface conductance, including the top sur-
10
face conductance and bottom surface conductance. The two
surface conducting channels are of interests due to its high
mobility and non-scattering carrier transport. Considering the
large intrinsic carrier density in its bulk, the top surface is
more sensitive to the top gate control than the bottom surface,
so the two surfaces do not play symmetric roles under gate
bias. The bottom surface has a better interface condition with
21–23
face during ALD dielectric formation are on-going.
The authors would like to thank X. Xu, C. Liu, G. Q. Xu,
Y.P. Chen, A.T. Neal, and N. Conrad for valuable discussions
and E. Milligan, W.J. Qian, J.F. Tian, and M. Xu for technical
assistance. The work is supported by DARPAMESO program.
the back SiO dielectric as it has been left intact during the
2
1
fabrication process, resulting in better back-gate control at the
same electrical field. However, the top surface condition of
the flakes had been changed to some extent due to Al O dep-
2
3
2
3
D. X. Qu, Y. S. Hor, J. Xiong, R. J. Cava, and N. P. Ong, Science 329,
ꢀ
20
osition, reacting with H O at 200 C. This reaction might
2
4
5
6
not be severe enough to completely damage the material, as
there was only a tiny trace of water vapor as one precursor in
one of the alternating ALD pulses. In addition, this water cor-
rosion could only take place in the first several cycles of
Al O deposition and would naturally cease when the flake is
5993 (2010).
7
T. Zhang, P. Cheng, X. Chen, J. F. Jia, X. Ma, K. He, L. Wang, H. Zhang, X.
D. Teweldebrhan, V. Goyal, and A.A. Balandin, Nano Lett. 10, 1209 (2010).
F. Xiu, L. He, Y. Wang, L. Cheng, L. T. Chang, M. Lang, G. Huang, X.
H. Steinberg, D. R. Gardner, Y. S. Lee, and P. J. Herrero, Nano Lett. 10,
5032 (2010).
S. Cho, N. P. Butch, J. Paglione, and M. S. Fuhrer, Nano Lett. 11, 1925
8
9
2
3
covered with Al O . But then again, the water corrosion could
2
3
considerably impact on the interface quality, resulting in a sig-
nificant decrease in surface modulation under field-effect.
In the same Figures 2(a) and 2(b), the counterparts of
top-gate and back-gate control of Device 1 are also shown.
Compared to Device 1, Device 2 shows similar back-gate
control, with a maximum modulation of 55.8% for a gate
sweep of À50 V to 50 V. However, the two devices differ in
top-gate control. Device 1 has a maximum modulation of
1
1
0
1
(2011).
12
1
1
1
1
3
4
5
6
16.7% with a smoother curve, whereas Device 2 has a modu-
(
1977).
lation of only 5.9% with a noisier curve, with the top-gate
voltage ranging from À5 V to 5 V. The weaker top gate
modulation in Device 2 further supports our conclusion that
ALD precursors are chemically absorbed to the top surface
of Bi Te . In Device 2, the use of ozone as an oxidant ALD
P. Walker and W. H. Tarn, CRC Handbook of Metal Etchants (CRC, Cul-
ver City, CA, 1990), p.163.
17
2
3
1
1
8
9
precursor leads to greater top surface damage during the first
several cycles of ALD growth because ozone is a stronger
oxidant than H O. As a consequence, the top interface of De-
20
2
2
2
2
1
2
3
vice 2 is more defective and the top-gate shows weaker chan-
nel modulation and much noisy curves.
Finally, the simultaneous dual gate modulations of Bi Te3
D. Kong, J. J. Cha, K. Lai, H. Peng, J. G. Analytis, S. Meister, Y. Chen, H.-J.
Zhang, I. R. Fisher, Z.-X. Shen, and Y. Cui, e-print arXiv:1102.3935v1 (2011).
D. Kim, S. Cho, N.P. Butch, P. Syers, K. Kirshenbaum, J. Pagolione, and
M.S. Fuhrer, e-print arXiv:1105.1410v1 (2011).
2
are shown in Figure 3. The top gate voltage is swept from À5
H. M. Benia, C. Lin, K. Kern, and C.R. Ast, e-print arXiv:1105.2664v1
(2011).
V to 5 V while the back gate ranges from À50 V to 50 V with
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
29.120.242.61 On: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 19:07:37
1