G Model
CATTOD-10498; No. of Pages10
ARTICLE IN PRESS
S.L. Bhanawase, G.D. Yadav / Catalysis Today xxx (2016) xxx–xxx
Table 1
2
amine, sodium hydroxide, potassium carbonate are used in stoi-
chiometric quantities and neutralized at the end of reaction causing
environmental pollution problems. The literature review suggests
that guaifenesin synthesis has not been so far reported using het-
erogeneous catalysis. In this work, we report a novel protocol for
the synthesis of guaifenesin using guaiacol and glycidol catalyzed
by calcined hydrotalcite (CHT). The reaction is additive and 100%
atom economical. Influences of different parameters are studied
including reaction mechanism and kinetics.
TPD analysis of catalysts, PMZH, MgO, CHT, HMSSH, and Al2O3.
Catalyst
PMZH
MgO
CHT
HMSSH
Al2O3
−1
Acidity (mmol g
)
0.09
0.49
0.41
0.75
0.68
1.53
0.63
0.48
0.76
0.32
Basicity (mmol g−1)
described in preparation of hydrotalcite (Section 2.1.1). Aluminium
hydroxide was calcined at 450 C in a furnace for 6 h to get alu-
◦
minium oxide (Al O ).
2
3
2
. Experimental
2.1.5. Magnesium oxide
Magnesium hydroxide was synthesized by co-precipitation
Following catalysts were prepared and further characterized by
various techniques, details of which are included in supporting
information.
method from magnesium nitrate. The same procedure described
in preparation of hydrotalcite (Section 2.1.1) was followed. Mag-
◦
nesium hydroxide was calcined at 450 C in a furnace for 6 h to get
magnesium oxide (MgO).
2.1. Preparation of catalysts
2.1.1. Hydrotalcite (HT)
2.2. Reaction procedure
The synthesis process is different and modified from that
reported in literature [27]. HT of Mg: Al ratio 3:1 was prepared
by co-precipitation method. Solution of magnesium nitrate (7.66 g,
In a typical reaction, autoclave reactor (details included in sup-
porting information) was charged with guaiacol (0.0081 mol), gly-
cidol (0.020 mol), tetrahydrofuran (THF) (10 mL) and 0.03 g mL
−
1
0
.03 mol) and aluminium nitrate (3.79 g, 0.01 mol) in 30 mL distilled
water was prepared. Solution of sodium hydroxide (3.6 g, 0.09 mol)
and sodium carbonate (2.8 g, 0.027 mol) in 30 mL distilled water
was prepared. At constant pH (9), both the solutions were added
simultaneously to a round bottom flask (500 mL) with overhead
(0.9 g) of the catalyst. The total organic phase volume was made to
30 mL with THF. An initial sample was taken at the desired temper-
ature. The reaction mixture was stirred with mechanical stirrer at
the desired speed, and samples were collected periodically. For con-
stirrer at a speed of 300 rpm immersed in oil bath at temperature
trol reaction, speed of agitation was 1000 rpm and temperature was
◦
120 ◦C at self-generated pressure. Reaction samples were analyzed
3
0 C. White precipitate of HT was obtained and further digested
◦
by HPLC (details included in supporting information). Synthe-
sis of guaifenesin (3-(2-methoxyphenoxy)propane-1,2-diol) and
byproduct (2-(2-methoxyphenoxy)propane-1,3-diol) from con-
densation reaction of guaiacol and glycidol is shown in Scheme 1.
at 60 C for 12 h. HT obtained was washed with distilled water to
get neutral pH to the supernatant solution. HT was filtered and
then dried at 100 C for 24 h to obtain dry lumps. HT lumps were
◦
crushed in mortar to get fine powder of weight 2.8 g. HT powder
◦
was calcined at 450 C for 6 h to get calcined HT (CHT) [27].
3. Results and discussions
2
(
.1.2. Hexagonal mesoporous silica supported hydrotalcite
HMSSH)
Hexagonal mesoporous silica (HMS) was prepared by a known
3.1. Catalyst characterization
procedure [28]. HMSSH (10% w/w) of Mg: Al ratio 3:1 was prepared
by co-precipitation method. In a conical flask, solution of mag-
nesium nitrate (2.29 g, 0.009 mol) and aluminium nitrate (1.14 g,
TPD (temperature programmed desorption) analysis of the cat-
alysts PMZH, MgO, CHT, HMSSH, and Al2O3 was carried out to find
out the strength of acidic and basic sites (Table 1). Acidity (except
Al2O3) and basicity of CHT was the highest. In the case of CHT, NH3
0.003 mol) in 50 mL distilled water was prepared. In another conical
◦
flask, solution of sodium hydroxide (1.08 g, 0.027 mol) and sodium
carbonate (0.85 g, 0.008 mol) in 50 mL distilled water was prepared.
Five g of HMS was added to a round bottom flask (250 mL) with
overhead stirrer at a speed of 300 rpm immersed in oil bath at tem-
desorption peak was observed at 123 C corresponding to weak
−
1
as well as strong acidic sites of concentration 0.68 mmol g (Fig.
◦
S1). Two CO2 desorption peaks were observed, first peak at 116 C
corresponding to weak basic sites of concentration 0.95 mmol g
and second peak at 264 C corresponding to strong basic sites of
−
1
◦
◦
perature 30 C. At constant pH (9), both the solutions were added
−
1
simultaneously to the round bottom flask, white precipitate of HT
concentration 0.58 mmol g (Fig. S2) [12,17,33].
◦
was obtained, which further was digested at 60 C for 12 h. Material
All the catalysts were analyzed for surface area analysis. All
showed, type IV adsorption–desorption isotherm with hysteresis
loop of type H1, which is a characteristic of a mesoporous solid
(Fig. 1). The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area, Langmuir
surface area, pore size, and pore volume of all the catalysts are
shown in Table 2. Surface area of PMZH was the lowest. Surface
area of HMSSH was the highest while pore size was the lowest. After
calcination, surface area of hydrotalcite increases due to formation
of mixed Mg-Al metal oxides. On calcination, due to evolution of
CO2 and H2O, more porous material is formed by the formation of
pores through the layers. Hydrotalcites containing carbonates and
showing such behavior have been reported [27]. BET surface area of
so obtained was washed with distilled water to get neutral pH to
the supernatant solution. Then material was filtered and dried at
◦
1
00 C for 12 h to obtain dry powder. It was crushed in mortar to
◦
get fine powder which was calcined at 450 C for 6 h [11,29].
2.1.3. Potassium modified zirconium hydroxide (PMZH)
PMZH (8.8% w/w) was prepared by wet impregnation method.
Zirconium hydroxide was synthesized by a known procedure
30,31]. 0.25 g of potassium nitrate was dissolved in 1.5 mL of dis-
[
tilled water. This solution was added to 1 g of zirconium hydroxide
◦
under stirring to get wet material which was dried in oven at 100 C
2
−1
for 12 h. It was crushed in mortar to get fine powder which was
CHT was measured to be 240.5 m g . The pore volume and pore
◦
−1
calcined at 600 C for 3 h [32].
diameter were 0.97 mL g and 159.2 Å, respectively. Pore width of
CHT was in range of 100–600 Å (Fig. S3).
2
.1.4. Aluminium oxide
Aluminium hydroxide was synthesized by co-precipitation
22-700) corresponding to (003), (006), (012), (015), (018), (110),
◦
method from aluminium nitrate by following the same procedure
Please cite this article in press as: S.L. Bhanawase, G.D. Yadav, Activity and selectivity of different base catalysts in synthesis of guaifenesin