ChemComm
Communication
Fig. 3 Partial 1H NMR spectrum of 6 in the range of 213–313 K, CDCl3,
500 MHz (methylene part of the spectrum).
In conclusion, a simple and scalable synthesis of 2,14-
dithiacalix[4]arene with alternating bridges (–CH2– and –S–) is
reported. Interestingly, using the same bisphenol-based start-
ing building blocks under modified reaction conditions, novel
homooxa analogues possessing three different bridging units
(–CH2–, –S– and –CH2–O–CH2–) in the molecule could be
isolated selectively. These systems exhibited interesting con-
formational behaviour enabling study of the flip-flop motion of
the circular HB arrays using dynamic NMR techniques.
This research was supported by the Czech Science Founda-
tion (P207/12/2027).
Fig. 2 (a) Partial 1H NMR spectrum of 5 in the range of 213–273 K, CDCl3,
500 MHz (aromatic and hydroxy part of the spectrum), (b) partial 1H NMR
spectrum of 5 in the range of 213–298 K in CDCl3 and 313–363 K in
C2D2Cl4, 500 MHz (methylene part of the spectrum).
These two processes could be clearly demonstrated on
macrocycle 5 possessing the smallest cavity. Thus, by cooling
down the temperature to 213 K, the broad time-averaged signal
of methylene bridges split under slow exchange conditions into
two doublets (at 4.26 and 3.61 ppm) typical for axial and
equatorial methylene bridges of the cone conformation. The
coalescence temperature (Tc E 298 K) of this motion enabled
us to calculate the activation free energy DG* of the cone–cone
equilibrium of 57 kJ molÀ1, which was in good accordance with
the published data.7
An unexpected conformational behaviour was revealed for
the hydroxyl and aromatic protons. As can be seen (Fig. 2a),
the time-averaged signals (10.00 ppm for OH, 7.50 ppm and
7.25 ppm for the H–Ar atom (with meta coupling J = 2.4 Hz)) were
visibly doubled at the lowest temperature (213 K). This behaviour
can be attributed to the flip-flop motion of the circular HB arrays
where the direction of the hydrogen bonds leads to non-equivalent
signals of the OH groups and the aromatic protons. As this splitting
of signals is not possible for common thiacalix[4]arene, due to the
symmetry, the presence of mixed bridges made our systems ideal
candidates for a model study of this phenomenon which could be
seen even in 13C aromatic resonances (see ESI†). The DG* value for
5 (50 kJ molÀ1, Tc E 240 K for OH protons, Tc E 230 K for H–Ar)
corresponded with that published for the parent thiacalix[4]arene
(43 kJ molÀ1).11
Notes and references
1 C. D. Gutsche, Calixarenes an Introduction, The Royal Society of
Chemistry, Thomas Graham House, Cambridge, 2008.
2 (a) Calixarenes in the Nanoworld, ed. J. Vicens, J. Harrowfield and
L. Backlouti, Springer, Dordrecht, 2007; (b) L. Mandolini and
R. Ungaro, Calixarenes in Action, Imperial College Press, London,
2000.
3 For recent reviews on thiacalixarenes see: (a) R. Kumar, Y. O. Lee,
V. Bhalla, M. Kumar and J. S. Kim, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014, 43, 4824;
(b) N. Morohashi, F. Narumi, N. Iki, T. Hattori and S. Miyano, Chem.
Rev., 2006, 106, 5291; (c) P. Lhotak, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2004, 1675.
4 The term ‘‘heteracalixarene’’ indicates the presence of heteroatoms
in the bridging positions (instead of common CH2 groups), while
‘‘heterocalixarene’’ shows that calixarene walls are built up from
heterocycles instead of phenols (e.g. calixpyrroles).
5 For some recent reviews or papers, see e.g.: (a) H. Tsue, K. Ishibashi,
T. Koichi and R. Tamura, Top. Heterocycl. Chem., 2008, 17, 73;
(b) W. Maes and W. Dehaen, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2008, 37, 2393;
(c) J. Thomas, W. Van Rossom, K. Van Hecke, L. Van Meervelt,
M. Smet, W. Maesac and W. Dehaen, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 43.
¨
6 (a) O. Kundrat, I. Cisarova, B. Bohm, M. Pojarova and P. Lhotak,
J. Org. Chem., 2009, 74, 4592; (b) O. Kundrat, H. Dvorakova, V. Eigner
and P. Lhotak, J. Org. Chem., 2010, 75, 407; (c) O. Kundrat, J. Kroupa,
¨
S. Bohm, J. Budka, V. Eigner and P. Lhotak, J. Org. Chem., 2010,
´˘ ˘´
¨
´
75, 8372; (d) J. Lukasek, S. Bohm, H. Dvorakova, V. Eigner and
´
The same dynamic processes were also observed for 6, but
due to its larger cavity the flip-flop motion of the circular
hydrogen bond arrays with DG* E 40 kJ molÀ1 (Tc E 203 K)
was not so obvious (see ESI†). Similarly to 5, the methylene
resonances (A = CH2–O–CH2, B = CH2) clearly exhibited the
cone–inverted cone equilibrium with DG* = 50 kJ molÀ1 (Tc E
263 K) (Fig. 3). The lower DG* values for both processes
reflected the expanded cavity of 6. Unfortunately, due to the
increased flexibility of macrocycle 7, it was not possible to prove
the above described effects unambiguously.
P. Lhotak, Org. Lett., 2014, 16, 5100.
7 T. Sone, Y. Ohba, K. Moriya, H. Kumada and K. Ito, Tetrahedron,
1997, 53, 10689.
8 N. Kon, N. Iki, Y. Yamane, S. Shirasaki and S. Miyano, Tetrahedron
Lett., 2004, 45, 207.
9 Y. Ohba, K. Moriya and T. Sone, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1991, 64, 576.
10 See e.g.: (a) B. Dhawan and C. D. Gutsche, J. Org. Chem., 1983,
48, 1536; (b) B. Masci, Tetrahedron, 2001, 57, 2841; (c) B. Masci, in
¨
Calixarenes 2001, ed. Z. Asfari, V. Bohmer, J. Harrowfield and
J. Vicens, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2001, p. 235.
11 The DG* for the flip-flop motion of hydrogen bonds was assessed by
means of measurements of nuclear spin relaxation: J. Lang,
´
´
´
K. Vagnerova, J. Czernek and P. Lhotak, Supramol. Chem., 2006, 18, 371.
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
Chem. Commun.