302
X.-Z. Xiao, B. Yan / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 448 (2008) 298–302
observed and the optimum concentrations for Tb3+, Er3+, Sm3+
are 5, 1, 3 mol%, respectively.
Acknowledgements
The work was supported by the Science Fund of Shanghai
University for Excellent Youth Scientists and National Natural
Science Foundation of China (20301013).
References
[1] V. Buissette, A. Huignard, K. Lahlil, T. Gacoin, J.P. Boilot, A.C. Franville,
R. Mahiou, Proc. Spie 52222 (2003) 140.
[2] V.A. Bolchouchine, E.T. Goldburt, B.N. Levonovitch, V.N. Litchmanova,
N.P. Sochtine, J. Lumin. 87–89 (2000) 1277–1279.
[3] K. Morimoto, in: S. Shinoya, W.M. Yen (Eds.), Phosphor Handbook, CRC
Press, Boca Raton, 1999, pp. 573–580.
[4] A.K. Levine, F.C. Papilla, Appl. Phys. Lett. 5 (1964) 118.
[5] A.K. Levine, F.C. Papilla, Electrochem. Technol. 4 (1996) 16.
[6] J. Dexpert-Ghys, R. Mauricot, M.D. Faucher, J. Lumin. 69 (1996) 203.
[7] M.A. Aia, J. Electrochem. Soc. 114 (4) (1967) 367.
[8] U. Rambabu, K. Annapurna, T. Balaji, J.V. Satyanarayan, K.R. Reddy, S.
Buddhudu, Spectrosc. Lett. 29 (5) (1996) 833.
Fig. 8. Emission spectra of YNb0.5V0.5O4:Er3+ (λex = 243 nm).
[9] N. Hashimoto, Y. Takada, K. Sato, S. Ibuki, J. Lumin. 48–49 (1991) 893.
[10] N. Arul Dhas, K.C. Patil, J. Alloys Compd. 202 (1993) 137.
[11] Y. Fujishiro, H. Ito, T. Sato, A. Okuwaki, J. Alloys Compd. 252 (1997)
103.
[12] M. Yu, J. Lin, Z. Wang, J. Fu, S. Wang, H.J. Zhang, Y.C. Han, Chem. Mater.
14 (2002) 2225.
[13] J. Hess, G.J. Exarhos, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 178 (1994) 91.
[14] A. Polman, J. Appl. Phys. 82 (1997) 1.
[15] E. Cavalli, M. Bettinell, A. Belletti, A. Speghini, J. Alloys Compd. 341
(2002) 107.
[16] S.J. Yang, L.J. Yuan, J.T. Sun, Rare Met. 22 (2003) 95.
[17] A.M.G. Massabni, G.J.M. Montandon, M.A. Couto dos Santos, Mater. Res.
1 (1998) 1.
[18] B. Yan, H.H. Huang, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 39 (2004) 3529.
[19] B. Yan, W.G. Zhao, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 110 (2004) 23.
[20] H.H. Huang, B. Yan, Inorg. Chem. Commun. 7 (2004) 595.
[21] H.H. Huang, B. Yan, Inorg. Chem. Commun. 7 (2004) 717.
[22] B. Yan, L. Zhou, J. Alloys Compd. 372 (2004) 238.
[23] A.M.G. Massabni, G.J.M. Montandon, M.A. Couto dos Santos, Mater. Res.
1 (1998) 1.
cence quenching. It is worth to point out that the luminescent
intensity of Tb3+ in YNb0.5P0.5O4 is stronger than that of Tb3+
in YNbO4 and YPO4 phosphors and the intensity of Er3+ and
Sm3+ in YNb0.5V0.5O4 is stronger than that of Er3+ and Sm3+
in YNbO4, while weaker than that of YVO4:Er3+/Sm3+. It is
possible that the incorporation of Nb in YPO4, which could act
as a bridge between the host absorption and the activator cen-
ter. Such a bridging effect could facilitate the energy-transfer
process. Namely, the incorporation of the Nb in PO4 enhances
the luminescence of Tb3+ center with the assistance of NbO4
bridges [26]. For YNb0.5V0.5O4, it was reported that almost all
the energy transfers which occur after the absorption of light
all the more favored when the wave function overlaps are effi-
cient. It was proved in bulk YVO4:RE3+ phosphors, which have
the V–O–Y angle of 170◦ making the bonding overlap almost
optimum [28,35,36]. Thus, the Er3+ and Sm3+ in YNb0.5V0.5O4
is stronger than that of Er3+ and Sm3+ in YNbO4, while weaker
than that of YVO4:Er3+/Sm3+.
[24] S.H. Shina, D.Y. Jeon, J. Appl. Phys. 90 (2001) 5986.
[25] X.Q. Zeng, G.Y. Hong, H.P. You, X.Y. Wu, Chin. J. Lumin. 22 (2001) 58.
[26] K.S. Sohn, I.W. Zeon, H. Chang, S.K. Lee, H.D. Park, Chem. Mater. 14
(2002) 2140–2148.
[27] X.H. Chuai, H.J. Zhang, F.S. Li, Mater. Lett. 46 (2000) 244.
[28] A. Huignard, T. Gacoin, J.P. Boilot, Chem. Mater. 12 (2000) 1090.
[29] T.R.N. Kutty, Mater. Res. Bull. 25 (1990) 485.
[30] Z. Pei, Q. Su, S. Li, J. Lumin. 50 (1991) 123.
[31] G. Blasse, J. Solid State Chem. 7 (1973) 169.
[32] R.C. Ropp, Luminescence and the Solid State, Elsever Science, Amster-
dam, 1991.
[33] H.B. Liang, Y. Tao, J.H. Xu, H. He, H. Wu, W.X. Chen, S.B. Wang, Q. Su,
J. Solid State Chem. 177 (2004) 901–908.
[34] S.H. Zhou, Z.L. Fu, J.J. Zhang, S.Y. Zhang, J. Lumin. 118 (2006) 179.
[35] L.G. Van Uitert, L.F. Johnson, J. Chem. Phys. 44 (9) (1966) 3514.
[36] G. Blasse, J. Chem. Phys. 45 (7.) (1966).
4. Conclusions
In summary, YNb0.5V0.5O4:RE3+ and YNb0.5P0.5O4:RE3+
(RE = Tb, Er, Sm) phosphors have been achieved by a novel
in situ assembling hybrid precursor co-precipitation tech-
nology. Both XRD and SEM results indicate that these
phosphor particles exhibit novel crystal morphology, especially
YNb0.5V0.5O4:RE3+ due to the similar chemical and physical
surroundings of Nb and V. Upon UV excitation in the host,
the characteristic luminescence of the three rare earth ions is