ChemComm
Communication
Table 2 Synthesis of various cyclic carbonates catalysed by complex 4 decreased concentration of the substrate. In addition, reasonable
a
and NBu
4
I
À1
À1
TOF values were obtained for 1c (180 h ) and 1e (175 h ). Thus,
4f,5f
b,c
our system achieves good initial TOFs at atmospheric pressure,
Entry
Substrate
Product
Yield (%)
À1
while a much higher initial TOF value of 36 000 h has been
5
g
reported by Kleij et al. under 10 bar CO2.
Overall, complex 4 is among the most active catalysts that
catalyze the formation of cyclic carbonates from CO and a broad
1
2
95
96
2
range of epoxides with a low catalyst loading under relatively low
pressure compared with other catalytic systems. Both terminal and
3
non-terminal substrates bearing different types of functional groups
were transformed into cyclic carbonates in good yields. It is also
noteworthy that all substrates were used as received without prior
removal of either oxygen or moisture, implying that lanthanide
complex 4 is relatively robust. These results strongly suggest that
organolanthanide complexes have great potential as catalysts for
d
3
93 (35 )
4
5
6
97
60
84
chemical fixation of CO
designing efficient organometallic catalysts in this field. Further
studies of these lanthanide complexes on the transformation of CO
2
, which provides some new insights for
2
are in process in our laboratory.
Financial support from the National Natural Science Foun-
dation of China (Grants 21174095, 21132002, and 21372172),
PAPD, and the Qing Lan Project is gratefully acknowledged. We
thank Professor Pierre H. Dixneuf and Professor Evgeny Kirillov
for helpful suggestions.
7
85
8
9
95
95
Notes and references
1
Reviews about transformations of CO
B. Rieger, W. A. Herrmann and F. E. K u¨ hn, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
011, 50, 8510–8537; (b) M. Peters, B. K ¨o hler, W. Kuckshinrichs,
W. Leitner, P. Markewitz and T. E. M u¨ ller, ChemSusChem, 2011, 4,
216–1240; (c) Z.-Z. Yang, L.-N. He, J. Gao, A.-H. Liu and B. Yu, Energy
2
: (a) M. Cokoja, C. Bruckmeier,
2
e
1
0
1
97
1
Environ. Sci., 2012, 5, 6602–6639; (d) X.-B. Lu, W. M. Ren and
G. P. Wu, Acc. Chem. Res., 2012, 45, 1721–1735; (e) I. Omae, Coord.
Chem. Rev., 2012, 256, 1384–1405; ( f ) M. Aresta, A. Dibenedetto and
A. Angelini, Chem. Rev., 2014, 114, 1709–1742.
e,g
1
66
2
Applications of cyclic carbonates: (a) B. Sch ¨a ffner, F. Sch ¨a ffner,
S. P. Verevkin and A. B ¨o rner, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 4554–4581;
(
b) E. Balaraman, C. Gunanathan, J. Zhang, L. J. W. Shimon and
e,h
1
2
3
84
D. Milstein, Nat. Chem., 2011, 3, 609–614; (c) P. H. Dixneuf, Nat.
Chem., 2011, 3, 578–579; (d) Z. Han, L. Rong, J. Wu, L. Zhang, Z. Wang
and K. Ding, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 13041–13045;
(e) S. Fukuoka, M. Kawamura, K. Komiya, M. Tojo, H. Hachiya,
K. Hasegawa, M. Aminaka, H. Okamoto, I. Fukawa and S. Konno,
Green Chem., 2003, 5, 497–507.
d e,h
1
75 (31 )
3
4
Reviews about synthesis of cyclic carbonates: (a) T. Sakakura and
K. Kohno, Chem. Commun., 2009, 1312–1330; (b) M. North,
R. Pasquale and C. Young, Green Chem., 2010, 12, 1514–1539;
(c) A. Decortes, A. M. Castilla and A. W. Kleij, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2010, 49, 9822–9837; (d) P. P. Pescarmona and M. Taherimehr,
Catal. Sci. Technol., 2012, 2, 2169–2187; (e) X.-B. Lu and
D. J. Darensbourg, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 1462–1484.
a
Reaction conditions: 0.2 mol% catalyst, 0.8 mol% NBu
4
I, 24 h, 1 bar
b
c
CO
2
(balloon), 85 1C. Isolated yield. Selectivity for the cyclic carbonate
d
e
were all 499%. Conversions in the absence of 4. 0.8 mol% NBu
4
Br,
2
5 h, 10 bar CO was used for 1k–n. 78% trans and 22% cis isomers.
f
4
g
h
8
1% trans and 19% cis isomers. Only cis-carbonate products are
formed.
(a) X.-B. Lu, B. Liang, Y.-J. Zhang, Y.-Z. Tian, Y.-M. Wang, C.-X. Bai,
H. Wang and R. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 3732–3733;
(
(
b) T. Chang, L. Jin and H. Jing, ChemCatChem, 2009, 1, 379–383;
c) A. Decortes, M. M. Belmonte, J. Benet-Buchholz and A. W. Kleij,
report shows that the stereochemistry can be controlled by the
4
g
co-catalyst loading and other factors.
To further evaluate the Ln-based catalyst 4, the initial TOF which
Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 4580–4582; (d) C. J. Whiteoak, E. Martin,
M. M. Belmonte, J. Benet-Buchholz and A. W. Kleij, Adv. Synth. Catal.,
2
012, 354, 469–476; (e) A. Coletti, C. J. Whiteoak, V. Conte and
5h
was considered as a measurement for the potential of a catalyst
A. W. Kleij, ChemCatChem, 2012, 4, 1190–1196; ( f ) H. V. Babu and
K. Muralidharan, Dalton Trans., 2013, 42, 1238–1248; (g) C. J.
Whiteoak, E. Martin, E. Escudero-Ad ´a n and A. W. Kleij, Adv. Synth. Catal.,
was then studied under atmospheric pressure using 1b as a bench-
À1
mark substrate. A good initial TOF of 220 h was obtained within
2
013, 355, 2233–2239; (h) D. Adhikari, S. T. Nguyen and M.-H. Baik, Chem.
1
h (Table S1, ESI†). However, the TOF decreased along with
Commun., 2014, 50, 2676–2678; (i) W.-Y. Gao, L. Wojtas and S. Ma, Chem.
Commun., 2014, DOI: 10.1039/c3cc47542e.
the increase of the conversion, mainly because of the obviously
10954 | Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 10952--10955
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014