2
044
F.W.P. Ribeiro et al. / Electrochimica Acta 56 (2011) 2036–2044
Table 2
HP concentrations recovered using SWV on HMDE and UV–vis procedures, in two commercial formulations. The [HP]added is related to the sample solution prepared from
commercial dosage.
SWV
UV–vis
Tablets
Oral solution
2 mg/mL
Tablets
Oral solution
2 mg/mL
Nominal dosage
1 mg/tablet
1 mg/tablet
−
−7
−1
−7
−1
)
[
[
[
HP]added (mg L 1)
0.372 (9.90 × 10 mol L
)
0.469 (12.50 × 10 mol L
−1
HP]found (mg L
HP]found (mol L
)
0.332
0.374
0.513
0.337
−
1
−7
−
−7
−7
−7
−7
−7
−7
)
8.84 × 10
9.96 × 10
13.66 × 10
9.49 × 10
7
Confidence interval
Recovery (%)
RSD (%)
± 0.98 × 10
± 0.97 × 10
± 0.48 × 10
± 1.72 × 10
89.24
100.54
3.96
109.38
1.43
76.12
6.34
4.48
BIAS (%)
−10.68
0.61
9.28
−28.36
the theoretical value, there were no significant differences between
proposed and standard procedure, considering the reproducibility
data. For t-test, considering t critical as 4.30, the t calculated values
were 2.04 and 3.56 for tablet and oral solutions, respectively. In
these samples, the calculated t values were lower than the critical
value.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the Brazilian research funding insti-
tutions CNPq, CAPES, FINEP for their financial support. Djenaine De
Souza also wishes to thank the CNPq (process 35.0014/2010.8) and
FUNCAP (process DCR-0039-1.06/09) for the PhD grant.
As can be observed there is a good agreement between the two
methods (statistically proved according to the paired t-test), indi-
cating that the proposed voltammetric method was found to be
more sensitive than the spectrophotometric method.
References
[
1] F.W.P. Ribeiro, A.S. Cardoso, R.R. Portela, J.E.S. Lima, S.A.S. Machado,
P. de Lima-Neto, D. De Souza, A.N. Correia, Electroanalysis 18 (2008)
2
031.
4
. Conclusions
[2] A.N.S. Dantas, D. De Souza, J.E.S. Lima, P. de Lima-Neto, A.N. Correia, Elec-
trochim. Acta 55 (2010) 9083.
[
[
3] S.A. Özkan, B. Uslu, H.Y. Abould-Enein, Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 33 (2007) 155.
4] S.A. Özkan, Curr. Pharm. Anal. 5 (2009) 127.
The voltammetric responses obtained by CV and SWV tech-
niques has shown that the HP can be reduced on HMDE. The
reduction of HP is pH-dependent, and the maximum voltammetric
responses were observed in basic medium, with pH values above
the pKa reported in the literature. Therefore, in pH 10.0 the voltam-
metric responses demonstrated that the redox process involves the
transfer of two electrons, in two consecutives steps; the first is a fast
and reversible transfer of one electron with an anion-radical for-
mation, and the second involves the irreversible reduction of the
anion-radical involving one electron, converting a carbonyl group
to a hydroxyl group, where both steps present a strong adsorption
process on the electrode surface.
[5] S.H.P. Serrano, R.C.M. Barros, M.S.S. Julião, F.R. Paula, in: J.A. Squella, S.
Bollo (Eds.), Electroanalytical Aspects of Biological Significance Compounds,
Transworld Research Network, Kerala, 2006, p. 51.
[
6] V. Mir cˆ eski, S. Komorsky-Lovri c´ , M. Lovri c´ , Square Wave Voltammetry – Theory
and Applications, Springer, Berlin, 2007.
[7] D. De Souza, L. Codognoto, R.A. Toledo, V.A. Pedrosa, R.T.S. Oliveira, L.H. Mazo,
L.A. Avaca, S.A.S. Machado, Quim. Nova 27 (2004) 790.
[
8] D. De Souza, R.A. Toledo, L.H. Mazo, L.A. Avaca, S.A.S. Machado, Electroanalysis
7 (2005) 2090.
1
[9] J. Wang, Analytical Electrochemistry, 2nd ed., Wiley VCH, New York, 2001.
10] W. Martindale, in: J.E.F. Reynolds (Ed.), Martindale: The Extra Pharmacopeia,
The Pharmaceutical Press, London, 1989.
11] J.C. Vire, M. Fisher, G.J. Patriarche, Talanta 28 (1981) 313.
[12] H.S. El-Desoky, M.M. Ghoneim, J. Pharm. Biom. Anal. 38 (2005) 543.
[13] P. Tuzhi, Y. Zhongping, L. Rongshan, Talanta 38 (1991) 741.
[
[
−
1
The best voltammetric responses were obtained in 0.04 mol L
[
[
14] E. Bishop, W. Hussein, Analyst 109 (1984) 139.
15] S. Ozkan, I. Byriol, S.T.P. Pharm. Sci. 5 (1995) 347.
−1
BR buffer (pH 10.0), with f = 100 s , a = 30 mV, ꢀEs = 2 mV. Analysis
of a purified laboratory electrolyte using the HMDE allowed for a
[16] F. Huang, Y.Y. Peng, G.Y. Jin, S. Zhang, J.L. Kong, Sensors 8 (2010) 1879.
[17] B. Uslu, S.A. Ozkan, Anal. Lett. 40 (2007) 817.
−1
very low detection limit of 1.78 g L associated with a high level
of repeatability and reproducibility. The comparison between the
analytical data obtained for the determination of HP using SWV
on the HMDE and UV–vis led to very coherent results, indicating
that the proposed electroanalytical procedure is an important tool
to detect HP in small concentrations. This fact can be observed by
applying the paired t-test and the variance ratio F-tests, where the
calculated values did not exceed the theoretical ones at P = 0.05,
demonstrating that the proposed method is as accurate and precise
as the reference spectrophotometric methods.
Finally, this work demonstrated that the proposed procedure
can be considered as a very interesting alternative for mechanistic
studies and the analytical determination of HP. Despite the haz-
ardous effects of mercury, unlike solid electrodes which need to be
cleaned and polished before each experiment, the self-renewing
HMDE can simply release the contaminated drop and grow a clean
drop between each experiment.
[
[
18] H.T.S. Britton, R.A. Robinson, J. Chem. Soc. 458 (1931) 1456.
19] J. Mocak, A.M. Bond, S. Mitchel, G. Scollary, Pure Appl. Chem. 69 (1997)
297.
[
[
20] Analytical Methods Committee, Analyst 112 (1987) 199.
21] R.G. Compton, C.E. Banks, Understanding Voltammetry, World Scientific, Lon-
don, 2007.
[22] D.R. Lide, Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, CRC Press, New York, 2008.
[23] J. Grimshaw, Electrochemical Reactions and Mechanisms in Organic Chemistry,
Elsevier, New York, 2000.
[
24] A.J. Fry, Synthetic Organic Electrochemistry, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Canada,
989.
1
[25] K.D. Gosser Jr., Cyclic Voltammetry: Simulation and Analysis of Reaction Mech-
anisms, VCH Publishers, New York, 1993.
[
[
26] R.S. Lawton, A.M. Yacynych, Anal. Chem. 53 (1981) 1523.
27] M. Noel, K.I. Vasu, Cyclic Voltammetry and the Frontiers of Electrochemistry,
Aspect Publications Ltd., London, 1990.
[
[
28] V. Mir cˆ eski, M. Lovri c´ , Electroanalysis 9 (1997) 1283.
29] V. Mir cˆ eski, V. Gulaboski, B. Jordanoski, Sˇ . Komorsky-Lovri c´ , J. Electroanal.
Chem. 490 (2000) 37.
[30] Sˇ . Komorsky-Lovri c´ , M. Lovri c´ , Anal. Chim. Acta 305 (1995) 248.
[
[
[
31] Sˇ . Komorsky-Lovri c´ , J. Electroanal. Chem. 219 (1987) 281.
32] M. Lovri c´ , Sˇ . Komorsky-Lovri c´ , J. Electroanal. Chem. 248 (1988) 239.
In addition to presenting good sensitivity and analytical stabil-
ity, this technique also presents the great advantages of eliminating
the interference from excipients from commercial formulations
minimising the steps of preparation of the samples and also limiting
the adsorptive problems related to the use of other solid surfaces.
33] J.J. O’dea, A. Ribes, J.G. Osteryoung, J. Electroanal. Chem. 345 (1993) 287.
[34] J.N. Miller, J.C. Miller, Statistics and Chemometrics for Analytical Chemistry,
Pearson Prentice Hall, United Kingdom, 2005.
[
[
35] A.R. Lea, D.M. Hailey, P.R. Duguid, J. Chromatogr. 250 (1982) 35.
36] E. Prichard, V. Barwick, Quality Assurance in Analytical Chemistry, Wiley Inter-
science, New York, 2007.