B. S. Chhikara et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 53 (2012) 5335–5337
5337
tration because this strategy provides a non-invasive mode of
administration minimizing the effects of organic solvents. Trans-
dermal delivery offers net advantages over oral administration in
terms of lowered systemic side effects associated with organic sol-
vents. Gel components could be chosen according to their compat-
ibility with intended applications, such as using non-toxic solvents
for pharmaceutical applications. It is envisioned that organogel for-
mation by 4 provides preliminary results for the potential use of
nucleoside analogue organogels as topical anti-HIV microbicide
applications. Optimization of the solvents to other nontoxic sol-
vents and formulations are required to make these organogels
appropriate for pharmaceutical applications. One major advantage
of this organogel is that the active nucleoside pharmaceutical com-
ponent is a part of gelator and does not need to be mixed with an-
other drug, avoiding problems associated with the uncontrolled
release of drugs from the formulation. FLT is expected to be re-
leased from the conjugate 4 through hydrolysis by cellular esterase
as shown in other ester conjugates of nucleosides.12
In conclusion, the formation of organogels by FLT conjugation
with N-myristoylglutamic acid was investigated. FLT-myristoyl
glutamate conjugate formed organogel in dichloromethane, tolu-
ene, and xylene at 1% w/w. The formed gels were opaque and re-
mained stable at room temperature. This method can be used for
the gelation of other NRTIs conjugated with N-myristoylglutamic
acid as the organogelator. This organogel NRTI can be used for
the potential application as a topical anti-HIV microbicide. This
strategy presents major advantages as drug delivery formulations,
such as ease of preparation and route of administration.
Figure 2. UV thermal graph for the compound 4 in CHCl3 with absorbance at
265 nm. (a) Cooling graph from 50 to 5 °C; (b) heating graph from 5 to 50 °C. The
reading is average of three readings for respective graph.
Acknowledgments
We thank the US National Science Foundation, Grant Number
CHE 0748555 for the financial support and National Center for Re-
search Resources, NIH, and Grant Number 1 P20 RR16457 for spon-
soring the core facility.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found,
References and notes
1. Chhikara, B. S.; Parang, K. Exp. Opin. Drug Del. 2010, 7, 1399–1414.
2. Chhikara, B. S.; Mandal, D.; Parang, K. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 4601–4608.
3. Kumar, S.; Mishra, A. K.; Chhikara, B. S.; Chuttani, K.; Sharma, R. K. Hell. J.
Nuclear Med. 2008, 11, 91–95.
4. Agarwal, H. K.; Loethan, K.; Mandal, D.; Doncel, G. F.; Parang, K. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 1917–1921.
5. Costin, J. M. Virol. J. 2007, 4, 100.
6. Mehellou, Y.; De Clercq, E. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 53, 521–538.
7. Lederman, M. M.; Offord, R. E.; Hartley, O. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2006, 6, 371–382.
8. Kang, L.; Liu, X. Y.; Sawant, P. D.; Ho, P. C.; Chan, Y. W.; Chan, S. Y. J. Control. Rel.
2005, 106, 88–98.
9. Vintiloiu, A.; Leroux, J.-C. J. Control. Rel. 2008, 125, 179–192.
10. Agarwal, H. K.; Chhikara, B. S.; Quiterio, M.; Doncel, G. F.; Parang, K. J. Med.
Chem. 2012, 55, 2672–2687.
Figure 3. TEM of the organogel of 4 in toluene.
11. Pal, A.; Chhikara, B. S.; Govindaraj, A.; Bhattacharya, S.; Rao, C. N. R. J. Mat.
Chem. 2008, 18, 2593–2600.
12. Agarwal, H. K.; Chhikara, B. S.; Hanley, M. J.; Ye, G.; Doncel, G. F.; Parang, K. J.
Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 4861–4871.
of diclofenac, piroxicam, and indomethacin.7 Most of these formu-
lations are used for transdermal, rectal, or subcutaneous adminis-