October 2011
1231
American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, U.S.A.). The cells were
maintained in RPMI 1640 or Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM)
medium, which was supplemented with penicillin (100 units/ml), 10% fetal
bovine serum and streptomycin (50 units/ml) at 37 °C in a humidified incu-
bator with 5% CO2 atmosphere.
MTT Assay Cell viability was examined by measuring the ability of
cells to metabolize MTT to a purple formazan dye.34) Cells were seeded in
96-well tissue culture plates for 24 h and then incubated with the tested com-
pounds at different concentrations for different periods of time. After incu-
bation, 20 ml/well of MTT solution (5 mg/ml phosphate buffered saline
(PBS)) was added and incubated for 5 h. The medium was aspirated and re-
placed with 150 ml/well dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to dissolve the for-
mazan salt formed. The color intensity of the formazan solution, which re-
flects the cell growth condition, was measured at 570 nm using a microplate
spectrophotometer (VSERSA Max).
which is subsequently hydrolyzed by intracellular esterase to
form dichlorofluorescein, DCFH. The non-fluorescent sub-
strate is oxidized by the intracellular free radicals, producing
a fluorescent product DCF.30) The treatment of DSeD led to a
rapid disruption of DYm in A375 cells (Fig. 5). Therefore,
we examined the intracellular ROS generation in A375 cells
by measuring the DCF fluorescence intensity to test whether
ROS was implicated in DSeD-induced apoptosis. As shown
in Fig. 6A, DSeD treatments for 3 h resulted in dose-depen-
dent decrease in DCF fluorescence intensity, indicating the
down-regulation of intracellular ROS generation by DSeD.
The total antioxidant activity of DSeD was thus evaluated by
1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scaveng-
ing assay. The results showed that DSeD dramatically inhib-
Flow Cytometric Analysis The cell cycle distribution was examined by
flow cytometry according to Li et al.35) Briefly, the cells cultured with or
ited the formation of DPPH free radicals in a dose-dependent without DSeD were trypsinized, washed with PBS and fixed with 70%
ethanol overnight at ꢅ20 °C. The fixed cells were washed with PBS and
stained with PI working solution (1.21 mg/ml Tris, 700 U/ml RNase,
50.1 mg/ml PI, pH 8.0) for 4 h in darkness. The stained cells were analyzed
with Epics XL-MCL flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Miami, FL, U.S.A.).
manner (Fig. 6B), demonstrating the potent antioxidant activ-
ity of DSeD. Moreover, a thiol-reducing antioxidant N-
acetylcysteine (NAC) failed to prevent the cells from DSeD-
induced apoptosis (Fig. 6C) and growth inhibition (Fig. 6D).
These results indicate that DSeD-induced apoptosis in A375
cells is independent of ROS generation.
Cell cycle distribution was analyzed using MultiCycle software (Phoenix
Flow Systems, San Diego, CA, U.S.A.). The proportion of cells in G0/G1, S,
G2/M phases was represented as DNA histograms. Apoptotic cells with hy-
podiploid DNA content were measured by quantifying the sub-G1 peak in
the cell cycle pattern. For each experiment, 10000 events per sample were
recorded.
TUNEL Assay and DAPI Staining Apoptotic DNA fragmentation in-
duced by ASDO was examined by using an in situ cell death detection kit
following the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, cells cultured in chamber
slides were fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde for 10 min and permeabilized
with 0.1% triton X-100 in PBS. After then, the cells were incubated with
100 ml/well of TUNEL reaction mixture at 37 °C for 1 h. The nuclei of the
cells were double stained with 1 mg/ml of DAPI for 15 min. Stained cells
were examined on a fluorescence microscope (Nikon Eclipse 80i).
Caspase Activity Assay Harvested cell pellets were suspended in cell
lysis buffer and incubated on ice for 1 h. After centrifugation at 11000ꢇg
Experimental
Materials Furan (AR, Aldrich), thiophene (AR, Aldrich), selenophene
(AR, Sigma), AlCl3 (AR, Aldrich) and succinyl chloride (AR, Sigma) were
purchased commercially. DPPH, thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide (MTT),
DAPI, propidium iodide (PI) and NAC were obtained from Sigma. Caspase-
3 substrate (Ac-DEVD-AFC), caspase-8 substrate (Ac-IETD-AFC) and Cas-
pase-9 substrate (Ac-LEHD-AFC) were purchased from Calbiochem. The
general caspase inhibitor (z-VAD-fmk) was purchased from Calbiochem.
The caspase-8 inhibitor (z-IETD-fmk) and caspase-9 inhibitor (z-LEHD-
fmk) were obtained from Merck. Air-sensitive reagents were manipulated in
an argon atmosphere. All solvents were dried and purified by standard pro-
cedures.
Synthesis and Characterization The schematic route for the synthesis for 30 min, supernatants were collected and immediately measured for pro-
of DOD, DSD and DSeD was showed in Chart 1.
Synthesis of DOD A CH2Cl2 solution containing furan (5 ml) and suc-
tein concentration and caspase activities. The cell lysates were placed in
96-well plates and then specific caspase substrates (Ac-DEVD-AFC for
cinyl chloride (1 g) was added dropwise to an anhydrous CH2Cl2 solution caspase-3, IETD-AFC for caspase-8 and Ac-LEHD-AFC for caspase-9
(100 ml) containing AlCl3 (5 g) under Ar2 at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was substrate) were added. Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h and caspase
stirred at 0 °C for 2 h, slowly warmed to room temperature, and stirred for
12 h. Then the mixture was poured into a beaker containing ice. Ethyl ac-
etate was added and the organic layer was in a separatory funnel. After
removing the solvent under vacuum, the residue crystallised with
activity was determined by fluorescence intensity with the excitation and
emission wavelengths set at 380 and 440 nm, respectively.
Evaluation of Mitochondrial Membrane Potential (DYm) Cells in
6-well plates were trypsinized and resuspended in 0.5 ml of PBS buffer
hexanes : ethyl acetate (7 : 3). Yields, 25%.31) 1H-NMR (CDCl3) d: 7.61 (2H, containing 10 mg/ml of JC-1. After incubation for 10 min at 37 °C in the in-
dd, Jꢄ1.7 Hz, 5-H), 7.25 (2H, dd, Jꢄ3.6 Hz, 3-H), 6.55 (2H, dd, Jꢄ3.6 Hz,
4-H) and 3.30 (4H, s, CH2); IR (KBr) cmꢅ1: 1661 (CꢄO), 1651, 1574, 1496,
1324 and 1036; MS (EI) m/z: 218 [MꢆH]ꢆ.
cubator, cells were immediately centrifuged to remove the supernatant. Cell
pellets were suspended in PBS and then analyzed by flow cytometry. The
percentage of the green fluorescence from JC-1 monomers was used to
represent the cells that lost DYm.
Synthesis of DSD DSD was prepared in a method similar to that of
DOD, except, the residue crystallized from hexanes. Yields, 50%.32) 1H-
Measurement of ROS Generation The effects of DSeD on ROS-initi-
NMR (CDCl3) d: 3.41 (4H, s, COCH2), 7.16 (2H, dd, Jꢄ3.8, 1.1 Hz, H- ated intracellular oxidation were evaluated by DCF fluorescence assay.16)
4,4ꢀ), 7.66 (2H, dd, Jꢄ3.8, 5.0 Hz, H-3,3ꢀ), 7.83 (2H, dd, Jꢄ1.1, 5.0 Hz H- Briefly, collected cells were incubated with DCFH-DA at a final concentra-
5,5ꢀ); IR (KBr) cmꢅ1: nꢄ3100, 2920, 1648 ; MS (EI) m/z: 250 [MꢆH]ꢆ.
Synthesis of DSeD DSeD was synthesized in an approach similar to
that of DOD, with the crude product was purified by crystallizing from pe-
troleum. Yields, 25%.33) 1H-NMR (CDCl3) d: 8.36 (2H, dd, Jꢄ5.2, 0.8 Hz),
8.02 (H, dd, Jꢄ4, 1.2 Hz), 7.40 (2H, dd, Jꢄ5.6, 4.4 Hz), 3.39 (4H, s); IR
(KBr) cmꢅ1: 1652 (CꢄO); MS (EI) m/z: 345.9 [MꢆH]ꢆ.
tion of 10 mM at 37 °C for 30 min. The loaded cells were then washed twice
with PBS and ROS level was determined by measuring the fluorescence in-
tensity on a Tecan SAFIRE fluorescence reader.
DPPH Free Radical Scavenging Assays DPPH free radical scavenging
activity of DSeD was measured according to the method as previously de-
scribed.36) Briefly, 20 ml of test samples at different concentrations was
mixed with 180 ml of DPPH solution (60 mM in methanol) for 30 min in the
Cell Culture The cell lines used in this study, including human
melanoma A375 cells, human liver cancer HepG2 cells, human breast carci- dark, and then, the change in absorbance at 517 nm was measured. DMSO
noma MCF-7 cells, human cerical cancer HeLa299 cells, mouse neuroblas-
toma Neuro-2a cells, human Prostate cancer PC-3 cells, human proximal tu-
bular epithelial HK-2 cells and human HS68 fibroblast were obtained from
was used as a negative control.
Statistical Analysis Experiments were carried out at least in triplicate
and results were expressed as meanꢂS.D. Statistical analysis was performed
using SPSS statistical program version 13 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, U.S.A.).
Difference with ∗pꢃ0.05 or ∗∗ pꢃ0.01 was considered statistically significant.
Acknowledgements This work was supported by Natural Science Foun-
dation of China and Guangdong Province, Key Project of Science and Tech-
nology Department of Guangdong Province, the Fundamental Research
Funds for the Central Universities and Program for New Century Excellent
Talents in University.
Chart 1. Schematic Route for Synthesis of DOD, DSD and DSeD