Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditionsa
Scheme 1
entry
conditions
yield (%)b
1
2
2 equiv of BF3‚OEt2, CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 2 h
20 mol % Sc(OTf)3, H3CCN,
4Å sieves, 0 °C, 3 h
51
45
3
4
5
20 mol % Sc(OTf)3, CH2Cl2, CaSO4,c
-20 °C, 3 h
93
80
79
of dioxinones as nucleophiles is exceedingly rare.7 From a
practical perspective, the â-hydroxy-dioxinones employed
in this strategy are more stable than related â-keto esters
and can be directly accessed from catalytic asymmetric
additions of dienolates to aldehydes.8 Finally, the addition
of nucleophilic alkoxides directly to the reaction flask would
then convert intermediate 3 to the targeted 2,6-disubstituted
tetrahyrdropyran-4-ones with an appended carboxy substitu-
ent.
Our initial investigations focused on identifying optimal
carbon-carbon bond-forming conditions to generate stable
species with the general structure of 3 (Table 1, eq 2). While
stoichiometric quantities of BF3‚OEt2 promoted the cycliza-
tion of â-hydroxy-dioxinone 1a and aldehyde (2a, entry 1),
we were delighted to discover that catalytic amounts of
scandium(III) trifluoromethanesulfonate afforded high yields
of the desired heterocycle 3a (entries 2-5). Gratifyingly,
the diastereoselectivity of the overall process is excellent (20:
1), affording the 2,6-cis relative stereochemistry.9 A survey
of the catalyst loadings indicated that 10 mol % of Sc(OTf)3
was optimal in terms of yield and reaction time. The use of
other metal triflate salts in the reaction, such as Sm(OTf)3,
La(OTf)3, Mg(OTf)2, and Zn(OTf)2, did not provide signifi-
cant quantities of the desired cyclizied product, 3a. It is
important to note that the choice of dehydrating agent
(CaSO4) is crucial for obtaining high yields of the pyrone
products under catalytic conditions.10 Utilizing molecular
sieves or anhydrous magnesium sulfate consistently afforded
lower yields of 3a in a variety of solvents.
10 mol % Sc(OTf)3, CH2Cl2, CaSO4,c
-20 °C, 4 h
5 mol % Sc(OTf)3, CH2Cl2, CaSO4,c
-20 to 23 °C, 24 h
a Reactions performed at 0.2 M. b Isolated yield. c Anhydrous.
With efficient Lewis acid catalyzed conditions identified,
the influence of aldehyde structure on the transformation to
3 was probed (Table 2, eq 3). Saturated aldehydes participate
in the cyclization, with linear systems (entries 1, 2, and 8)
being superior to R-branched substrates (entry 9) in terms
of yield. The overall diastereoselectivity of the reaction is
dependent on the structure of the aldehyde. For example,
p-anisaldehyde, 1-naphthaldehyde, and isobutyraldehyde
provide reduced levels of selectivity compared to unbranched
saturated or electron-deficient substrates. Various dioxinones
(1) with alkyl chains (linear and branched) or aromatic rings
(such as phenyl) flanking the hydroxyl group are good
substrates and do not adversely impact diastereoselectivity
of the resulting bicyclic compounds.
Table 2. Scope of Sc(OTf)3-Catalyzed Cyclization
(6) For dioxinone enolate additions to carbonyl compounds, see: See-
bach, D.; Misslitz, U.; Uhlmann, P. Chem. Ber. 1991, 124, 1845-1852.
For organomagnesium reagents from dioxinones, see: Vu, V. A.; Berillon,
L.; Knochel, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 6847-6850. For a photocy-
cloaddition/fragmentation approach to tetrahydropyrones utilizing dioxino-
nes, see: Dritz, J. H.; Carreira, E. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 5579-
5582.
(7) For the only example of trapping an N-acyliminium electrophile with
a dioxinone ring, see: Teerhuis, N. M.; Hiemstra, H.; Speckamp, W. N.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 159-162. For related cyclizations that utilize
δ-hydroxy-â-keto esters and stoichiometric quantities of harsh Lewis acids,
see: (a) Clarke, P. A.; Martin, W. H. C. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4527-4529
(BF3‚OEt2). (b) Sabitha, G.; Reddy, G. S. K. K.; Rajkumar, M.; Yadav, J.
S.; Ramakrishna, K. V. S.; Kunwar, A. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44,
7455-7457 (TMSI).
entry
R
R1
yield (%)b dr (cis:trans)c product
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Ph(CH2)2 Ph(CH2)2
Ph(CH2)2 n-hexyl
Ph(CH2)2 Ph
Ph(CH2)2 4-Cl-Ph
Ph(CH2)2 4-Fl-Ph
Ph(CH2)2 4-MeO-Ph
Ph(CH2)2 1-Naphthyl
Ph(CH2)2 BnO(CH2)3
Ph(CH2)2 i-Pr
80
85
71
73
83
54
81
80
75
64
70
20:1
20:1
6:1
20:1
20:1
2:1
3:1
20:1
2:1
3a
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
(8) (a) Singer, R. A.; Carreira, E. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117,
12360-12361. (b) Krueger, J.; Carreira, E. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 837-838. (c) Denmark, S. E.; Beutner, G. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 7800-7801.
10 Ph
11 cyclohexyl Ph(CH2)2
Ph(CH2)2
20:1
20:1
a Reactions performed at 0.2 M. b Isolated yield after chromatographic
1
(9) As determined by H NMR (500 MHz) NOE experiments.
purification. c As determined by H NMR (500 MHz).
1
(10) Ben, A.; Yamauchi, T.; Matsumoto, T.; Suzuki, K. Synlett 2004,
225-230.
1114
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 6, 2005