10.1002/anie.201712398
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
COMMUNICATION
over Ru/Ba-Ca(NH2)2 could be any formation steps of N-Hx
In summary, we have developed highly active and stable
catalysts containing a Ba-Ca(NH2)2 support and Ru or Co
nanoparticles for low-temperature NH3 synthesis. The catalytic
activity of Ru/Ba-Ca(NH2)2 is ca. 6 and 100 times higher than that
of the industrial benchmark Fe catalyst (at 340ºC) and Cs-
Ru/MgO (at 260ºC), respectively. Hydrogen pretreatment of the
species rather than the N2 dissociation step.[13]
The reaction orders with respect to N2, H2, and NH3 are also
listed in Table S3. Both the N2 and H2 reaction orders for Ru/Ba-
Ca(NH2)2 are close to unity, and the reaction order of NH3 is -0.92.
This observation suggests that N-Hx species populate the catalyst
surface more densely than N and H adatoms. This tendency is
completely distinct from that for a conventional Ru catalyst such
as Cs-Ru/MgO. The NH3 order (-0.35) was less negative than the
H2 order (-0.50), which indicates that the surface of Cs-Ru/MgO
is poisoned by hydrogen. Most Ru catalysts have a negative
reaction order with respect to H2 at low temperatures, whereas
Ru/Ba-Ca(NH2)2 has a positive H2 order, even at 260ºC. The
unusual reaction order for Ru/Ba-Ca(NH2)2 is attributed to the
unique core-shell structure shown in Figure 2C. Reversible
exchange between hydride ions and electrons occur at Ru-
Ca(NH2)2 interfaces, which imparts high tolerance to hydrogen
poisoning.[7d] A similar reaction is considered to occur between Ru
and Ba-Ca(NH2)2 shell. Next, the possibility of NH3 formation from
the Ba-Ca(NH2)2 support was investigated using isotopic 15N2 and
H2. As 15N2 decreased, the signals measured for m/z =18 and 17
increased with the intensity ratio in the range of 0.77-0.82 (Figure
4), where these signals were derived from 15NH3. On the other
hand, 14NH3 was not produced by the reaction, which confirms
that N atoms in Ba-Ca(NH2)2 are not used for NH3 formation, but
gas-phase N2 molecules are activated over the Ru catalyst by
electron donation from the Ba-Ca(NH2)2 support.
Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed
to investigate the electron-donation ability of Ba-Ca(NH2)2. Table
S4 summarizes the WFs and formation energies of NH2 defects
(ENH2def) on Ca(NH2)2 (101) and Ba(NH2)2 (101) surfaces. The
calculated WF for Ba(NH2)2 is smaller than that for Ca(NH2)2,
which indicates the superior electron donating ability of Ba(NH2)2
over Ca(NH2)2. When an NH2 unit was removed from the surface
of each amide, the WFs of Ca(NH2)2 and Ba(NH2)2 were
significantly reduced to 2.1 and 1.9 eV, respectively. Such a low
WF is attributed to the formation of anionic electrons confined at
the sites of NH2 vacancies. Similar results were observed for other
surfaces (Table S5). The calculated ENH2def for Ba(NH2)2 is much
smaller than that for Ca(NH2)2, which suggests that the formation
of anionic electrons by NH2 desorption as ammonia is much easier
for Ba(NH2)2 than for Ca(NH2)2. Thus, by combining DFT
calculations and STEM observations, low WF Ba(NH2)2-x is
formed near the Ru surface during H2 pretreatment, which
facilitates NH3 synthesis over Ru/Ba-Ca(NH2)2 via electron
donation from Ba(NH2)2-x to Ru nanoparticles. Although the WF of
anionic electrons at the Ba(NH2)2 surface is lower than that at
Ca(NH2)2, the catalytic activity of the former is much lower than
that of the latter (Table 1). No mesopore formation or epitaxial
growth of Ru nanoparticles occurred for pure Ba(NH2)2, which
could be due to the large lattice mismatch between Ru and
Ba(NH2)2.
Ru/Ba-Ca(NH2)2 catalyst provides
a mesoporous support
structure and induces the formation of Ru-Ba core-shell structures.
This unique structure is self-organized and stable for a long time.
The overlayers derived from the Ba-Ca(NH2)2 support suppress
H2 poisoning at the Ru surface at low reaction temperatures via
reversible exchange reaction between hydride ions and electrons.
In addition, the formation of low-WF Ba(NH2)2-x at the catalyst
surface promotes N2 dissociation over the Ru catalyst, which
shifts the bottleneck in NH3 synthesis from N2 dissociation to N-
Hx bond formation. The present results demonstrate that alkaline-
earth amide materials can realize the optimal potential of
transition metal catalysts for low-temperature NH3 synthesis.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a fund from the Accelerated
Innovation Research Initiative Turning Top Science and Ideas into
High-Impact Values (ACCEL) program of the Japan Science and
Technology Agency (JST), and the ENEOS Hydrogen Trust Fund.
We appreciate the technical assistance of M. Okunaka and S.
Fujimoto.
Keywords: Low-temperature ammonia synthesis • core-shell
structure • mesoporous • alkaline earth metal amide • ruthenium
[1]
[2]
J. M. Thomas, W. J. Thomas, Principles and practice of heterogeneous
catalysis, John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
a) H. Liu, Ammonia synthesis catalysts: innovation and practice, World
Scientific, 2013; b) T. Kandemir, M. E. Schuster, A. Senyshyn, M.
Behrens, R. Schlögl, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 12723-12726.
a) D. V. Yandulov, R. R. Schrock, Science 2003, 301, 76-78; b) K.
Arashiba, Y. Miyake, Y. Nishibayashi, Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 120-125; c)
K. T. Ranjit, T. K. Varadarajan, B. Viswanathan, J. Photochem.
Photobiol., A 1996, 96, 181-185; d) G. L. Wendt, J. E. Snyder, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1928, 50, 1288-1292; e) C. J. M. van der Ham, M. T. M.
Koper, D. G. H. Hetterscheid, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5183-5191.
a) K. Aika, A. Ozaki, H. Hori, J. Catal. 1972, 27, 424-431; b) A. Ozaki,
Acc. Chem. Res. 1981, 14, 16-21; c) K. Aika, Catal. Today 2017, 286,
14-20; d) G. Prieto, F. Schüth, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 3222-
3239; e) N. Saadatjou, A. Jafari, S. Sahebdelfar, Chem. Eng. Commun.
2015, 202, 420-448.
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
a) S. E. Siporin, R. J. Davis, J. Catal. 2004, 225, 359-368; b) F. Rosowski,
A. Hornung, O. Hinrichsen, D. Herein, M. Muhler, G. Ertl, Appl. Catal., A
1997, 151, 443-460.
The improvement of the catalytic activity and stability of
Ru/Ca(NH2)2 by Ba-doping has been already reported in our
previous work,[7d] in which Ru/Ba-Ca(NH2)2 prepared by using
Ru3(CO)12 was pretreated at 340ºC. The catalytic activity was not
largely improved although the catalyst stability was significantly
improved. The XPS analyses revealed that the surface Ba/Ca
ratio of the Ru/Ba-Ca(NH2)2 in the current work is much higher
than that of the previous catalyst (Table S2). The surface Ba
species mainly contribute to the overlayer formation on the Ru
nanoparticles (Figure 2), suggesting that the catalytic activity of
surface Ru sites on the current Ru/Ba-Ca(NH2)2 are effectively
enhanced by the surface Ba species rather than the case of the
previous one. In addition, the present Ru/Ba-Ca(NH2)2 has a
larger surface area (100 m2 g-1) than the previous catalyst (58 m2
g-1). The formation of Ru-Ba core-shell structure and the
mesoporous structure with a large surface area can be caused by
the H2 pretreatment of Ba-Ca(NH2)2 with Ru(acac)3 at 400ºC
(Figure S17).
a) K. Sato, K. Imamura, Y. Kawano, S. Miyahara, T. Yamamoto, S.
Matsumura, K. Nagaoka, Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 674-679; b) R. Manabe, H.
Nakatsubo, A. Gondo, K. Murakami, S. Ogo, H. Tsuneki, M. Ikeda, A.
Ishikawa, H. Nakai, Y. Sekine, Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 5434-5439.
a) M. Kitano, Y. Inoue, Y. Yamazaki, F. Hayashi, S. Kanbara, S. Matsuishi,
T. Yokoyama, S. W. Kim, M. Hara, H. Hosono, Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 934-
940; b) M. Kitano, S. Kanbara, Y. Inoue, N. Kuganathan, P. V. Sushko,
T. Yokoyama, M. Hara, H. Hosono, Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6731; c) M.
Kitano, Y. Inoue, H. Ishikawa, K. Yamagata, T. Nakao, T. Tada, S.
Matsuishi, T. Yokoyama, M. Hara, H. Hosono, Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 4036-
4043; d) Y. Inoue, M. Kitano, K. Kishida, H. Abe, Y. Niwa, M. Sasase, Y.
Fujita, H. Ishikawa, T. Yokoyama, M. Hara, H. Hosono, ACS Catal. 2016,
6, 7577-7584.
[7]
[8]
a) P. K. Wang, F. Chang, W. B. Gao, J. P. Guo, G. T. Wu, T. He, P. Chen,
Nat. Chem. 2017, 9, 64-70; b) W. B. Gao, P. K. Wang, J. P. Guo, F.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.