ChemComm
Communication
a brilliant blue fluorescent image of the writing appeared (Fig. 2b). Fig. S11 (ESI†), the SEM images of OG showed an overlapped rugate-
This fluorescent image could be erased by brushing Fe3+ on the layered structure. The thickness of each layer was approximately
film. Therefore, the CaFeG film could not only act as a convenient 10–20 nm. The metallogels CaG and CaFeG also showed overlapped
reversible H2PO4À detection test kit, but also act as an erasable rugate-layered structures. These results indicated that although
dual-channel security display material. It is worth noting that gelator G coordinated with Ca2+ or Fe3+, significant changes did
security display materials are composed of invisible substances not occur in the self-assembly states. Moreover, the XRD patterns
that provide printed images that cannot be photocopied and are (Fig. S12, ESI†) of the OG, FeG, CaFeG and the CaFeG treated
À
readable only under special environments. Although thermally with H2PO4 showed periodical diffraction peaks, indicating
rewritable printing media have already been developed, security that they assembled into the ordered structures. The peaks at 2y =
display materials that allow the rewriting of invisible printed 22.96–23.761 corresponded to d-spacing 3.73–3.87 Å, which sug-
images are very rare.9
gested that p–p stacking existed in the naphthyl groups of these gels.
The self-assembly and stimuli-response mechanism of the
In summary, we have demonstrated a new strategy for the
supramolecular gels were carefully investigated. In concentration designing of stimuli-responsive supramolecular gels. In this manner,
dependent 1H NMR (Fig. S8a–c, ESI†) of G, the –NH (Ha) and the stimuli-response selectivity and signal reporting property of the
–NQCH (Hb) resonance signals showed obvious downfield shifts as supramolecular gels are controlled by the competitive coordination of
the concentration of G increased. Moreover, in FT-IR (Fig. S9, ESI†), two different metal ions with gelators and guest. In the present work,
the CQO vibration absorption of OG shifted to a low wavenumber by the competitive coordination of Ca2+, Fe3+ with gelator and
in the corresponding OG xerogel. These results revealed that during H2PO4À, the strong aggregation-induced emission of the metallogel
gelation, the –NH (Ha) and –NQCH (Hb) groups formed hydrogen CaG was controlled as ‘‘OFF–ON–OFF’’. The CaFeG could not only act
bonds with the –CQO groups on adjacent gelators. On the other as a convenient highly selective and sensitive H2PO4À detection test
hand, as shown in Fig. S8a–c (ESI†), with a gradual increase in kit, but could also act as an erasable secret documentation medium.
1
concentration, the H NMR signal of naphthyl protons (Hc, Hd,
This work was supported by the National Natural Science
He and Hf) showed obvious upfield shift, indicating that the p–p Foundation of China (NSFC) (No. 21064006; 21161018;
stacking interactions between the naphthyl groups were involved 21262032), the Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province
in gelation.10 Therefore, as illustrated in Scheme S2 (ESI†), the (1308RJZA221) and the Program for Changjiang Scholars and
gelator G self-assembled to organogel OG by hydrogen bonds, Innovative Research Team in University of Ministry of Educa-
p–p stacking, as well as the van der Waals force existing in the tion of China (IRT1177).
long alkyl chains.
The formation of metallogels was also investigated. As shown in
Notes and references
Fig. S8d (ESI†), after the addition of 1 equiv. Ca2+ to the solution of G,
1 M. D. Segarra-Maset, V. J. Nebot, J. F. Miravet and B. Escuder, Chem.
the –NH (Ha) and –NQCH (Hb) showed significant downfield shifts,
Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 7086; X. Yan, F. Wang, B. Zheng and F. Huang,
and the phenyl proton Hg and Hh, which are neighbouring the acyl
(–CQO) group, shifted upfield. Meanwhile, in the IR spectra (Fig. S10,
ESI†), the stretching vibrations of –CQO and –CQN– of G shifted to
lower wavenumbers when G interacted with 1 equiv. of Ca2+. These
results indicated that in CaG, Ca2+ coordinated with nitrogen and
oxygen atoms on acylhydrazone group (Scheme S2, ESI†). In addi-
tion, after adding 2 equiv. of Fe3+ to the CaG, the stretching
vibrations of –CQO and –CQN– of G again shifted to lower
wavenumbers. Meanwhile, the absorption bands of –CQO
merged with the absorption bands of –CQN–, which indicated
that in the CaFeG, Fe3+ formed more stable coordination bonds
with oxygen and nitrogen atom on acylhydrazone group and Ca2+
was replaced by Fe3+ (Scheme S2, ESI†).
This self-assembly and competitive coordination mechanism
was also supported by the Tgel of OG, CaG and CaFeG. For instance,
as shown in Fig. S1b (ESI†), in the same condition, the Tgel of OG is
clearly higher than CaG and CaFeG, while the Tgel of CaG and
CaFeG are close to each other. The large differences of Tgel between
the OG and CaG or CaFeG were attributed to the breaking of
intermolecular hydrogen bonds among –NQC–H on one gelator
and –CQO on the other gelators (Scheme S2, ESI†) in OG, which
was caused by the coordination of Ca2+ or Cu2+ with gelator G.
To get further insights into the morphological features of
the organogel OG and metallogels CaG and CaFeG, SEM studies
were carried out with their respective xerogels. As shown in
Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 6042; J. M. Hu, G. Q. Zhang and S. Y. Liu,
Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 5933.
2 G. O. Lloyd and J. W. Steed, Nat. Chem., 2009, 1, 437.
3 Z. Qi, P. M. de Molina, W. Jiang, Q. Wang, K. Nowosinski, A. Schulz,
M. Gradzielski and C. A. Schalley, Chem. Sci., 2012, 3, 2073;
´
P. Cordier, F. Tournilhac, C. Soulie-Ziakovic and L. Leibler, Nature,
2008, 451, 977; J. Zhou, X. Du, Y. Gao, J. Shi and B. Xu, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2014, 136, 2970; H. Maeda, Chem. – Eur. J., 2008, 14, 11274.
4 G. Yu, X. Yan, C. Han and F. Huang, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 6697;
T. Aida, E. W. Meijer and S. I. Stupp, Science, 2012, 335, 813;
Z. X. Liu, Y. Feng, Z. C. Yan, Y. M. He, C. Y. Liu and Q. H. Fan,
Chem. Mater., 2012, 24, 3751; S. S. Babu, V. K. Praveen and
A. Ajayaghosh, Chem. Rev., 2014, 114, 1973.
5 J. H. van Esch and B. L. Feringa, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2000,
39, 2263; A. R. Hirst, B. Escuder, J. F. Miravet and D. K. Smith,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 8002; Y. M. Zhang, Q. Lin, T. B. Wei,
X. P. Qin and Y. Li, Chem. Commun., 2009, 6074; Y.-M. Zhang,
B.-B. Shi, H. Li, W.-J. Qu, G.-Y. Gao, Q. Lin, H. Yao and T.-B. Wei,
Polym. Chem., 2014, 5, 4722.
6 M.-O. M. Piepenbrock, G. O. Lloyd, N. Clarke and J. W. Steed, Chem. Rev.,
2010, 110, 1960; A. Y.-Y. Tam and V. W.-W. Yam, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013,
42, 1540; M. J. Mayoral, C. Rest, V. Stepanenko, J. Schellheimer,
´
R. Q. Albuquerque and G. Fernandez, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013,
135, 2148; W. Weng, J. B. Beck, A. M. Jamieson and S. J. Rowan, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 11663; F. Fages, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006,
45, 1680; J. Zhang and C.-Y. Su, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2013, 257, 1373.
7 Y. Hong, J. W. Y. Lam and B. Z. Tang, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 5361.
8 Analytical Methods Committee, Analyst, 1987, 112, 199.
9 A. Kishimura, T. Yamashita, K. Yamaguchi and T. Aida, Nat. Mater.,
2005, 4, 546; S. Srinivasan, P. A. Babu, S. Mahesh and A. Ajayaghosh,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 15122.
10 C. Po, Z. Ke, A. Y.-Y. Tam, H.-F. Chow and V. W.-W. Yam,
Chem. – Eur. J., 2013, 19, 15735.
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 10669--10671 | 10671