hydroxylation of maleic acid and fumaric acid in water to
create tartrate, as well as the hydrolysis of D-dimethyl tartrate.
We further show that an IDA is easily adapted to test strips.
Scheme 1. Formation of Tartratea
The design of host 1 has been reported.9 Previous studies
showed that boronic acids form reversible bonds with 1,2-
diols and R-hydroxy carboxylate,16 and guanidinium groups
bind carboxylates through H-bonds or charge-pairing interac-
tions.17,18 Further, on the basis of our previous studies, we
knew that upon addition of 1 to a solution of 2 (0.05 mM,
25% water in methanol (v/v), 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4) the
λmax of the indicator shifts from 441 nm to that of the
indicator-host complex. Addition of 3 to the solution of the
1:2 complex causes the λmax to shift back to 441 nm. The
binding constants between 1 and 2 and between 1 and d,l-3
are known to be KHI ) 6.1 × 104 M-1 and KHT ) 1.4 × 105
M-1, respectively.9,19
To follow the kinetics of tartrate formation, one must relate
the free indicator concentration to tartrate concentration. In
an IDA, the change of absorbance of the indicator is not
directly proportional to tartrate formation because of the
equilibria in eq 1, where H is the host, I is the indicator, and
T is tartrate. We solved for the relationship between indicator
concentration and tartrate concentration (eq 2). [HI] and [I]
can be related to absorbance changes via eqs 3 and 4, where
HI is host-indicator complex, HT is the host-tartrate
complex, [H]0 is the total concentration of the host, [I]0 is
the total concentration of the indicator, AI is the absorbance
of free indicator, A is measured absorbance, and AHI is
absorbance of the host-indicator complex. Last, [T] is used
in eq 5 to create the standard first order kinetics plot, where
[S]0 is the total concentration of the reactant, t is time, and
k is the reaction rate constant.
a Conditions: (a, b) 0.5 M, NaOH (2 equiv), NaClO3 (1.6 equiv),
water, 4% w/w OsO4 in water (0.4% mol equiv), 50 °C; (c) 0.2 M,
water, pH 2, 100 °C.
acid, 2 equiv of NaOH were used to bring the pH of the
solution near 7 so that when adding an aliquot (2 µL) of the
reaction mixture to the solution of the 1:2 complex in buffer
the overall pH of the solution would not be perturbed.
Typically, the reaction kinetics were followed by adding 2
µL of the reaction mixture into 1 mL of a solution of the
1:2 complex (0.25 mM 1, 0.05 mM 2, 25% water in methanol
(v/v), 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4) at each time interval, and
the absorbance was measured. For each interval of time, a
fresh 1 mL of the solution of the 1:2 complex was used
because for this particular reaction, the OsO4 would dihy-
droxylate the indicator after several minutes. The UV-vis
spectra and plots of kinetics are shown in Figure 1. Least-
squares fitting of the data to eq 5 gives rate constants for
the dihydroxylation of maleic acid and fumaric acid catalyzed
by osmium tetraoxide in water as 3 × 10-4 h-1 and 6 ×
10-4 min-1 respectively. The rate constant for the hydrolysis
of D-dimethyl tartrate was 3 × 10-4 h-1.
Besides applying the IDA to reaction kinetics, we also
developed a tartrate test strip that produced colors with
different intensities upon applying different tartrate concen-
trations. The test strip was prepared by adding 1-2 mL of
buffer (20 mM HEPES, 25% water in methanol (v/v), pH
7.4) to a 3 cm × 1 cm filter paper (Fisher, Q8, cat. no. 09-
790F). After drying in air, 1 mL of the 1:2 complex (0.2
mM 1, 0.2 mM 2) was allowed to coat the paper, which
was placed on a watch glass. The solution was absorbed by
the paper, and the paper was dried in air. Using capillary
tubes, four different solutions of tartaric acids (1, 0.5, 0.1,
and 0.01 M at pH 7.2) were spotted on the paper. The spots
turned dark blue and the intensity of the color decreased as
the concentration of tartrate decreased (Figure 2).
HI + T h HT + I
[H]0KHI[I] - [HI] - KHI[I][HI]
KHT[HI]
(1)
(2)
[T]
AI - A
[HI] ) [I]
0AI - AHI
(3)
(4)
To exclude the possibility of residual metal in the paper
matrix, which may influence the color change, a control test
strip was made by pretreating the paper with a solution of
20 mM EDTA and washing with the same buffer, and the
[I]0 ) [I] + [HI]
[S]o - [T]
-ln
) kt
(5)
[S]o
(16) Wulff, G. Pure Appl. Chem. 1982, 54, 2093.
(17) Linton, B. R.; Goodman, M. S.; Fan, E.; Van Arman, S. A.;
Hamilton, A. D. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 7313.
(18) Berger, M.; Schmidtchen, F. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9986.
(19) Wiskur, S. L. Ph.D. Thesis. The University of Texas, Austin, Texas
2003.
We applied the mathematic derivation above to study the
kinetics of the dihydroxylation of maleic acid and fumaric
acid in water, and the hydrolysis of D-dimethyl tartrate
(Scheme 1). In the hydroxylation of maleic acid and fumaric
2500
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 15, 2004