Chemistry Letters 2001
977
This work was supported by “Research for the Future”
Program, the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, and a
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research, the Ministry of Education,
Science, Sports and Culture, Japan.
Dedicated to Prof. Hideki Sakurai on the occasion of his
70th birthday.
References and Notes
1
For reviews: a) T. Hayashi, Acc. Chem. Res., 33, 354 (2000). b) T.
Hayashi, in “Comprehensive Asymmetric Catalysis,” ed. by E. N.
Jacobsen, A. Pfaltz, and H. Yamamoto, Springer, Berlin (1999), Vol. 1,
Chap. 7. c) H. Nishiyama and K. Itoh, in “Catalytic Asymmetric
Synthesis,” 2nd ed., ed. by I. Ojima, Wiley-VCH, New York (2000), p
111.
2
a) C. E. Masse and J. S. Panek, Chem. Rev., 95, 1293 (1995). b) Y.
Yamamoto and A. Asao, Chem. Rev., 93, 2207 (1993). c) I. Fleming,
in “Comprehensive Organic Synthesis,” ed. by C. H. Heathcock,
Permagon, Oxford (1991), Vol. 2, p 563.
3
4
5
T. Hayashi, J. W. Han, A. Takeda, J. Tang, K. Nohmi, K. Mukaide, H.
Tsuji, and Y. Uozumi, Adv. Synth. Catal., 343, 279 (2001).
P. A. Toy and K. D. Janda, Acc. Chem. Res., 33, 546 (2000), and refer-
ences cited therein.
a) “Comprehensive Asymmetric Catalysis,” ed. by E. N. Jacobsen, A.
Pfaltz, and H. Yamamoto, Springer, Berlin (1999). b) “Catalytic
Asymmetric Synthesis,” 2nd ed., ed. by I. Ojima, Wiley-VCH, New
York (2000).
6
7
8
C. Dong, J. Zhang, W. Zheng, L. Zhang, Z. Yu, M. C. K. Choi, and A.
S. C. Chan, Tetrahedron Asym., 11, 2449 (2000).
T. Hayashi, M. Konishi, Y. Kobori, M. Kumada, T. Higuchi, and K.
Hirotsu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 106, 158 (1984).
a) S.-Y. Cho and M. Shibasaki, Tetrahedron Lett., 39, 1773 (1998). b)
S. Gladiali, S. Pulacchini, D. Fabbri, M. Manassero, and M. Sansoni,
Tetrahedron Asym., 9, 391 (1998). c) Y. Uozumi, N. Suzuki, A.
Ogiwara, and T. Hayashi, Tetrahedron, 50, 4293 (1994). d) Y. Uozumi,
A. Tanahashi, S.-Y. Lee, and T. Hayashi, J. Org. Chem., 58, 1945
(1993).
9
Characterization of compounds: (3) colorless oil. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ
0.87 (t, J = 6.1 Hz, 6H), 1.04 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H), 1.20–1.43 (m, 20H),
1.62–1.68 (m, 4H), 2.69 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 4H), 3.98–4.03 (m, 4H), 7.04 (s,
4H), 7.37 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H), 7.60 (s, 2H), 7.84 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H).
[α]20D +0.4 (c 1.3, CHCl3). (4) colorless oil. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 0.85
(t, J = 7.1 Hz, 6H), 1.21–1.38 (m, 20H), 1.63–1.69 (m, 4H), 2.71 (t, J =
7.8 Hz, 4H), 4.97 (s, 2H), 7.07 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.15 (d, J = 8.6 Hz,
2H), 7.33 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.65 (s, 2H), 7.88 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H).
[α]20D –66 °(c 1.4, CHCl3). (5) colorless oil. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 0.87
(t, J = 6.9 Hz, 6H), 1.21–1.39 (m, 20H), 1.54–1.72 (m, 4H), 2.76 (t, J =
7.6 Hz, 4H), 7.16 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.24 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.56 (d,
J = 9.1 Hz, 2H), 7.75 (s, 2H), 8.04 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 2H). [α]20D –108 °(c
1.3, CHCl3). (6) colorless oil. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 0.85–0.89 (m, 6H),
1.19–1.43 (m, 20H), 1.62–1.73 (m, 4H), 2.69 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 2.74
(t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.89 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H),
7.07 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.15 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 7.20–7.27 (m, 5H),
7.33–7.38 (m, 2H), 7.40–7.48 (m, 4H), 7.57 (s, 1H), 7.62 (dd, J = 11.5,
8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.69 (s, 1H), 7.79 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 7.92 (d, J = 8.7 Hz,
the other hand, the palladium catalyst of the new ligand 8 became
soluble in the reaction media, forming a clear solution even at
–10 °C. As a result, the hydrosilylation of 9a was catalyzed by
the palladium/8 at –10 °C to give (S)-3-trichlorosilylcyclohexene
(10a) of 83% ee, which is the highest value for the reaction of 9a
(entry 4). The enantioselecctivity of the Ar-MOP ligands was
not influenced greatly by introduction of the n-octyl group, which
is shown by the same stereochemical outcome obtained in the
hydrosilylation at 0 °C (entries 1 and 2). The highest enantiose-
lectivity was also observed in the hydrosilylation of cyclopenta-
diene (9b) by use of the n-octylated MOP ligand 8. Thus, the
reaction of 9b proceeded at –30 °C in the presence of the palladi-
um/8 as a catalyst, to give (S)-3-trichlorosilylcyclopentene (10b)
of 91% ee (entry 8). Here again, the reaction with ligand 1 did
not take place at the same temperature (entry 7).
1H); 31P{1H} NMR (CDCl3) δ 28.9 (s). [α]20 +30 °(c 1.3, CHCl3).
D
(7) colorless oil. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 0.84–0.88 (m, 6H), 1.23–1.32
(m, 20H), 1.62–1.73 (m, 4H), 2.68 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 2.71 (t, J = 7.9
Hz, 2H), 6.81 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 6.90 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 6.98–7.01
(m, 2H), 7.05–7.17 (m, 5H), 7.22–7.29 (m, 5H), 7.39 (dd, J = 8.8, 3.0
Hz, 1H), 7.47 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H), 7.64 (s, 1H), 7.67 (s, 1H), 7.84 (d, J
= 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.95 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H); 31P{1H} NMR (CDCl3) δ
–12.07 (s). [α]20 –11 °(c 1.3, CHCl3). (8) colorless oil. 1H NMR
(CDCl3) δ 0.85–0D.90 (m, 6H), 1.20–1.33 (m, 20H), 1.64–1.69 (m, 4H),
1.83 (s, 6H), 2.69 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 2.73 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 3.60 (s,
3H), 6.61 (s, 2H), 6.66 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 6.74 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H),
6.82 (dd, J = 8.7, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 6.90 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.01–7.23 (m,
8H), 7.37 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.57 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.60 (s, 1H),
7.64 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.66 (s, 1H), 7.93 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H); 31P{1H}
NMR (CDCl3) δ –14.20 (s). FAB MS m/z (M+ + H) Calcd for
C57H66OP: 797.48 Found: 797.51. [α]20D +130 ° (c 0.3, CHCl3).
In summary, the introduction of two n-octyl groups into the
Ar-MOP ligand made the palladium catalyst soluble in the
hydrosilylation media. The high solubility of the chiral palladi-
um catalyst realized the hydrosilylation at a lower reaction tem-
perature, resulting in the higher enantioselectivity in the asym-
metric hydrosilyaltion of 1,3-dienes.
10 S. Kobayashi and K. Nishio, J. Org. Chem., 59, 6620 (1994).
11 Use of polar solvents such as dichloromethane makes the reaction mix-
ture homogeneous, but the hydrosilylation is slow in the polar solvents.