spectrometer (samples 4 and 6). Contacting Pt with hexane
reverse reconstruction which also
appeared after long storage in air. The less pronounced
amount of disordered carbon (BE B 284.1 eV) was most dele-
terious to all skeletal reactions. Dehydrogenation activity
increased in carbonized catalysts. In addition, the treatment
with n-hexane in the absence of hydrogen (sample 7) resulted
not only in the accumulation of much carbon but also in sup-
pression of the (311) and (222) reÑections. Thus, the activity of
Pt black is governed not only by its purity but also by its
(
sample 7) caused a
anisotropy after the Ðrst contact of Pt with H (sample 4 vs.
2
sample 6) indicates that movement of H and C atoms (present
in ample amount after nH treatments) between di†erent posi-
tions can be important in crystallite reconstruction. These
atoms were reported to be more stable on the Pt surface
restructuring under the e†ect of H .
2
above 250 K than CH entities.44
x
The reconstruction demonstrated by XRD after H treat-
Acknowledgements
2
ment may have been related to penetration of hydrogen atoms
Z.P. thanks the Max-Planck-Gesellschaft for inviting him as a
guest scientist to the Fritz-Haber-Institut, Berlin. The catalytic
measurements in Budapest were supported by the Hungarian
National Science Foundation, Grant No T 025599.
into subsurface layers.11,13 These might obviously have mobi-
lized other subsurface entities. One of the possible explana-
tions for the increased C 1s intensity after H treatment (Fig.
2
3)
could be their agglomeration into three-dimensional
(
possibly graphite-like) carbon promoted by hydrogen.45
References
Indeed, the Pt signal in ion scattering spectroscopy of a
carbon-covered Pt black increased by about 6 times, at the
same time, the percentage of Pt calculated from the Pt 4f XPS
signal only increased from 56 to 70%.16 This points to the
presence of thin C deposits permitting the underlying Pt to
appear in XPS. This reconstruction of surface carbon may be
the reason why sample 4 was more active than the apparently
1
2
3
G. A. Somorjai, Catal. L ett., 1992, 12, 17.
G. A. Somorjai, J. Mol. Catal. A, 1996, 107, 39.
G. A. Somorjai, in Introduction to Surface Chemistry and Cataly-
sis, Wiley, New York, 1994.
4
5
6
B. J. McIntyre, M. Salmeron and G. A. Somorjai, J. V ac. Sci.
T echnol. A, 1993, 11, 1964.
S. Nishiyama, S. Matsuura, H. Morita, S. Tsuruya and M. Masai,
Appl. Catal., 1985, 15, 185.
““cleanerÏÏ sample 3. The hydrogen-induced migration of sub-
T. Baird, Z. Paa
T rans. 1, 1973, 69, 50; T. Baird, Z. Paa
Chem. Soc., Faraday T rans. 1, 1973, 69, 1237.
Z. Paal, H. Zimmer, J. R. Gunter, R. Schlogl and M. Muhler, J.
Catal., 1989, 119, 146.
Z. Paal, Zh. Zhan, E. Fu
9.
J. Find, Z. Paa
9.
J. Find, Z. Paa
Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., 2000, 130, 2291.
11 Z. Paal and S. J. Thomson, J. Catal., 1973, 30, 96.
Z. Paal, S. Schlogl and G. Ertl, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday T rans.,
992, 88, 1179.
13 Z. Paal and Z. Zhan, L angmuir, 1997, 13, 3752.
Z. Paal, X. L. Xu, J. Paal-Lukacs, W. Vogel, M. Muhler and S.
Schlogl, J. Catal., 1995, 152, 252.
15 H. P. Bonzel, Surf. Sci., 1977, 68, 236.
16 Z. Paal, K. Matusek and M. Muhler, Appl. Catal. A, 1997, 149,
13.
Z. Paal and S. Schlo
l and S. J. Thomson, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday
surface C atoms to the surface, however, cannot be excluded.
Exposure to n-hexane resulted in accumulation of surface
C, present, in part, as three-dimensional overlayers:12,46
l and S. J. Thomson, J.
7
8
9
0
graphite as well as poly-C H . The BE values for carbon
x y
lo
p and B. Tesche, J. Catal., 1995, 156,
gl and U. Wild, Catal. L ett., 2000, 65,
l, H. Sauer, R. Schlogl, U. Wild and A. Wootsch,
species likely present on the Pt surface have been summarized
recently.30 More graphite was formed from nH/H (sample 5)
than with n-hexane alone (sample 7). Nongraphitic carbon
1
2
l, R. Schlo
1
(
BE B 284.1 eV) was present in the latter case. Counter claims
1
can be found concerning its structureÈwe may identify them
with the ““disordered carbon overlayerÏÏ47 or with the ““several
hydrocarbon fragments intermediate between ethylidyne and
1
2
1
a dehydrogenated C speciesÏÏ.48 This particular BE can arise
from several, single and/or multiple bonds between C and Pt,
2
1
4
more numerous than in the case of graphite and di†erent from
that of ““Pt/atomic CÏÏ entities. The latter was more abundant
after H2 treatment. Its presence can point to (a) hydrogen
forcing some C atoms from subsurface layers to the surface
and/or (b) splitting up of a fraction of polymerized surface
entities. This latter process may be important in regeneration
and can lead to carbon removal as methane.49
1
1
1
7
8
gl, Surf. Interface Anal., 1992, 19, 524.
Practical Surface Analysis, ed. D. Briggs and M. P. Seah, Wiley,
Chichester, 1990, Appendix 6, vol. 1, p. 635.
1
9
U. Wild, N. Pfa
1997, 357, 420.
20 JPCD Ðle (No. 4802).
nder and R. Schlogl, FreseniusÏ J. Anal. Chem.,
Skeletal reactions of n-hexane reportedly require various
active sites. They are ensembles of threefold symmetry for
2
2
2
1
2
3
V. Gnutzmann and W. Vogel, J. Phys. Chem., 1990, 94, 4991.
D. N. Belton and S. J. Schmieg, Surf. Sci., 1990, 233, 131.
K. S. Kim, N. Winograd and R. E. Davis, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
benzene formation,50 two neighbouring atoms for C ring
5
closure and opening51 while larger ensembles may possibly be
active for fragmentation.52 The importance of ““ledge
1
971, 93, 6296.
Z. Paal, K. Matusek and M. Muhler, Appl. Catal. A, 1997, 149,
113.
structuresÏÏ (or Ðve-coordinated ““B sitesÏÏ) as the active sites
2
4
5
of C -cyclisation, isomerisation and single hydrogenolysis was
5
also pointed out.37 The selectivity of these four main reactions
25 D. M. Collins and W. E. Spicer, Surf. Sci., 1977, 69, 85; P. R.
Norton, K. Griffiths and P. E. Bindner, Surf. Sci., 1985, 138, 125.
was roughly equal on samples 3 to 6, the most active sample 4
2
6
H. P. Bonzel, C. R. Helms and S. Kelemen, Phys. Rev. L ett., 1975,
35, 1237.
showing the highest selectivity for C saturated products,
6
especially MCP (Table 2). The promoting e†ect of hydrogen
2
2
7
8
Z. Paal, R. Schlogl and G. Ertl, Catal. L ett., 1992, 12, 331.
in the gas phase7,8,53 was explained in terms of much surface
hydrogen favouring their not too deeply dehydrogenated
intermediates.54 In addition, hydrogen treatment enhanced
the (220) and (311) reÑections (e.g. in sample 6). This can also
contribute to the high isomerisation and hydrogenolysis selec-
R. Sundararajan, G. Pet°, E. Koltay and L. Guczi, Appl. Surf.
Sci., 1995, 90, 165.
29 M. Kiskinova, G. Pirug and H. P. Bonzel, Surf. Sci., 1983, 133,
3
21.
N. M. Rodriguez, P. E. Anderson, U. Wild, R. Schlo
Wootsch and Z. Paal, J. Catal., 2001, 197, 365.
31 B. Torok, A. Molnar, I. Palinko and M. Barto
45, 295; A. Fasi, J. T. Kiss, B. Torok and I. Palinko
A, 2000, 200, 189.
3
0
gl, A.
tivities,55 since the so-called ““B -sitesÏÏ, with (311) or (110)
structure, reportedly favoured the related skeletal reactions:
5
Š
k, J. Catal., 1994,
, Appl. Catal.
1
isomerization and single hydrogenolysis.37 The almost con-
stant benzene selectivity may point to the stability of three-
atom ensembles50 during reconstruction. They may possibly
be in step or kink conÐguration.3,55
Surface (hydro)carbonaceous adsorbates ensured optimum
conditions for nondegradative reactions.56 This would explain
the high and reproducible activity of sample 6, even in the
presence of 20È25% ““invisible carbonÏÏ.57 The pronounced
32 V. Ponec, Adv. Catal., 1983, 32, 149.
3
3
Z. Paa
l, H. Groeneweg and J. Paal-Lukacs, J. Chem. Soc.,
Faraday T rans., 1990, 86, 3159.
3
3
4
5
S. C. Davis and K. J. Klabunde, Chem. Rev., 1982, 82, 153.
M. W. Roberts, Catal. L ett., 2000, 67(1), citing G. A. Somorjai, on
p. 50.
36 J. T. Miller, B. C. Meyers, F. S. Modica, G. S. Lane, M. Vaar-
kamp and D. C. Koningsberger, J. Catal., 1993, 143, 395.
2154
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2001, 3, 2148È2155