10.1002/cctc.201801598
ChemCatChem
FULL PAPER
groups. Instead, the previous general knowledge is that high Cr
loadings can cause the generation of inactive Cr(III) species, as
clusters and/or crystalline Cr2O3. Therefore, understanding and
investigating the characters of the formed isolated Cr(VI)
species in Cr/MCM-41 catalysts can be used to realize its
negative effect on catalytic activity for PDH process, which
deserved significant importance for Cr-based PDH catalyst
system.
The National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1402233,
21667016 and 21267011) is gratefully acknowledged for
financial support to this research work.
Keywords: Cr/MCM-41. Propane Dehydrogenation. Isolated
Cr(VI) Species. Cr Dispersion. Chromium Column Adsorption.
[1]
[2]
a) G. Zhang, C. Yang, J. T. Miller, ChemCatChem 2018, 10, 961-964; b)
S. Tan, S. J. Kim, J. S. Moore, Y. Liu, R. S. Dixit, J. G. Pendergast, D.
S. Sholl, S. Nair, C. W. Jones, ChemCatChem 2016, 8, 214-221.
a) E. Gomez, S. Kattel, B. Yan, S. Yao, P. Liu, J. G. Chen, Nat.
Commun. 2018, 9, 1-6; b) Z. J. Zhao, T. Wu, C. Xiong, G. Sun, R. Mu,
L. Zeng, J. Gong, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 10.1002/anie.
201800123.
Experimental Section
The mesoporous MCM-41 was prepared in our laboratory as previously
reported.[13c] The Cr modified MCM-41 catalysts with different weight of
Cr loadings (5, 10, and 15wt%) were synthesized by the wet
impregnation method, due to its superiority of low cost and operational
easy. Appropriate amounts of (NH4)2CrO4 in aqueous solution were
mixed with 2 g of MCM-41 samples and vigorously stirred for 1 h. After
impregnation, the resulting mixtures were dried at 90 oC for 6 h and
subsequently calcined at 550 oC for 6 h. All of the prepared catalysts
were pressed, crushed and sieved before the activity test.
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
H. Xiong, S. Lin, J. Goetze, P. Pletcher, H. Guo, L. Kovarik, K.
Artyushkova, B. M. Weckhuysen, A. K. Datye, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2017, 56, 8986-8991.
a) P. Hu, W. Z. Lang, X. Yan, X. F. Chen, Y. J. Guo, Appl. Catal. A 2018,
553, 65-73; b) P. Hu, W. Z. Lang, X. Yan, L. F. Chu, Y. J. Guo, J. Catal.
2018, 358, 108-117.
T. Otroshchenko, S. Sokolov, M. Stoyanova, V. A. Kondratenko, U.
Rodemerck, D. Linke, E. V. Kondratenko, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015,
54, 15880-15883.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) were obtained using Rigaku D/max-1200
diffractometer, with Cu-Kα radiation (λ=1.5406 Å) at 40 kV and 30 mA, to
determine the crystal structure of the obtained catalyst samples. X-ray
photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) were recorded on a PHI 5000 Versa
Probe II spectrometer to study the surface atomic states of chromium
species, and carbon calibration was done by referring C1 s peak at 284.6
eV. Ultraviolet-visible spectra (UV-vis) in absorbance mode were
measured with a Cary 500 spectrometer at room temperature, and the
spectra were recorded within the wavelength range of 200-850 nm.
a) L. R. Mentasty, O. F. Gorriz, L. E. Cadus, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1999,
38, 396-404; b) W. Z. Lang, C. L. Hu, L. F. Chu, Y. J. Guo, RSC Adv.
2014, 4, 37107-37113.
a) A. Węgrzyniak, A. Rokicińska, E. Hędrzak, B. Michorczyk, K.
Zeńczak-Tomera, P. Kuśtrowski, P. Michorczyk, Catal. Sci. Technol.
2017, 7, 6059-6068; b) T. P. Otroshchenko, U. Rodemerck, D. Linke, E.
V. Kondratenko, J. Catal. 2017, 356, 197-205.
[8]
[9]
M. Botavina, C. Barzan, A. Piovano, L. Braglia, G. Agostini, G. Martra, E.
Groppo, Catal. Sci. Technol. 2017, 7, 1690-1700.
Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) were collected on
a
a) K. Takehira, Y. Ohishi, T. Shishido, T. Kawabata, K. Takaki, Q.
Zhang, Y. Wang, J. Catal. 2004, 224, 404-416; b) P. Michorczyk, J.
Ogonowski, P. Kustrowski, L. Chmielarz, Appl. Catal. A 2008, 349, 62-
69.
Nicolet 560 IR spectrometer, using KBr plate in the range of 500-4000
cm-1. H2-temperature programmed reduction (H2-TPR) were performed
on a apparatus equipped with a thermal conductivity (TCD) detector. 50
mg of catalyst was pretreated in pure Ar flow at 400 oC for 1 h, and
reduced from 100 to 700 oC (at a ramping rate of 10 oC/min) with H2
(10%)/Ar flow. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were observed
using an S-4800 SEM (Hitachi S-4800, Japan), and elemental mapping
of catalysts were carried out. The STEM images coupled with the EDX
elemental mapping were also conducted.
[10] a) S. Kilicarslan, M. Dogan, T. Dogu, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52,
3674-3682; b) E. Asghari, M. Haghighi, F. Rahmani, J. Mol. Catal. 2016,
418-419, 115-124.
[11] a) B. M. Weckhuysen, R. A. Schoonheydt, Catal. Today 1999, 51, 223-
232; b) T. Shishido, K. Shimamura, K. Teramura, T. Tanaka, Catal.
Today 2012, 185, 151-156; c) J. Baek, H. J. Yun, D. Yun, Y. Choim J.
Yi, ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 1893-1903.
The PDH reaction was operated in a fixed-bed micro-reactor under
atmospheric pressure, and the reaction temperature was fixed at 630 oC.
Prior to reaction, 0.4 g of the catalyst was preheated at 630 oC in a
stream of N2 flow for 0.5 h. Afterwards, the feed gas consisted of
C3H8(14%)/N2 was introduced into the reactor, with the total flow rate of
29 mL/min. Products of PDH were analyzed by an online gas
chromatograph (GC) equipped with TCD, and FID (flame ionization
detector). The conversion of propane and selectivity of propene were
defined based on follows:
[12] a) V. Elías, E. Sabre, K. Sapag, S. Casuscelli, G. Eimer, Appl. Catal. A
2012, 413-414, 280-291; b) M. S. Kumar, N. Hammer, M. Rønning, A.
Holmen, D. Chen, J. C. Walmsley, G. Øye, J. Catal. 2009, 261, 116-
128; c) S. Sokolov, M. Stoyanova, U. Rodemerck, D. Linke, E. V.
Kondratenko, J. Catal. 2012, 293, 67-75.
[13] a) F. Ayari, M. Mhamdi, J. Álvarez-Rodríguez, A. R. G. Ruiz, G.
Delahay, A. Ghorbel, Appl. Catal. B 2013, 134-135, 367-380; b) S.
Shylesh, C. Srilakshmi, A. P. Singh, B. G. Anderson, Microporous
Mesoporous Mater. 2007, 99, 334-344; c) D. He, L. Zhang, Y. Zhao, Y.
Mei, D. Chen, S. He, Y. Luo, Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 3669-
3675.
C
[C3H 8]in C
[C3H 8]out 100%
C3H8 Conversion =
C
[C3H 8]in
[14] J. Su, W. Yao, Y. Liu, Z. Wu, Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 396, 1026-1033.
[15] P. Bai, Z. Ma, T. Li, Y. Tian, Z. Zhang, Z. Zhong, W. Xing, P. Wu, X. Liu,
Z. Yan, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 25979-25990.
[16] D. He, J. Yu, Y. Mei, J. Liu, Y. Zhao, S. Yang, X. Cao, S. He, Y. Luo,
Catal. Commun. 2018, 112, 31-34.
C3H6 Selectivity =
C
[C3H 6]out
100%
C
[C3H 6]out (2/3)C[C 2 H 6]out (2/3)C[C 2 H 4]out (1/3)C[CH 4]out
[17] P. Michorczyk, P. Pietrzyk, J. Ogonowski, Microporous Mesoporous
Mater. 2012, 161, 56-66.
whereC[C3H8]in is the initial concentration of C3H8 before the reaction, and
C[CxHy]out is the output concentration of hydrocarbons during the reaction.
[18] a) D. He, G. Wan, H. Hao, D. Chen, J. Lu, L. Zhang, F. Liu, L. Zhong, S.
He, Y. Luo, Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 289, 161-169; b) D. He, H. Hao, D.
Chen, J. Liu, J. Yu, J. Lu, F. Liu, G. Wan, S. He, Y. Luo, Catal. Today
2017, 281, 559-565.
Acknowledgements
[19] L. Zhang, Y. Zhao, H. Dai, H. He, C. T. Au, Catal. Today 2008, 131, 42-
54.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.